journal article·2020-06

Topological Space‐Time Photonic Transitions in Angular‐Momentum‐Biased Metasurfaces

Hooman Barati Sedeh, Mohammad Mahdi Salary, Hossein Mosallaei

Advanced Optical Materials· Volume 8· Issue 11
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, topological space‐time photonic transition of light in angular‐momentum‐biased metasurfaces is established, which yields a superposition of orbital‐angular‐momentum (OAM)‐carrying beams at distinct frequency harmonics upon scattering whose topological charges and frequency shifts are correlated. A reflective dielectric metasurface is considered that consists of silicon nanodisk heterostructures integrated with indium‐tin‐oxide and gate dielectric layers placed on a back mirror forming a dual‐gated field effect modulator. The metasurface is divided into several azimuthal sections wherein the nanodisk heterostructures are interconnected via biasing lines. Addressing each azimuthal section with radio‐frequency biasing signals separately allows for flexible implementation of different spatiotemporal modulation profiles. Active tuning of OAM states with high mode‐purity is demonstrated, which yields minimal cross‐talk between OAM channels in a mode‐multiplexed communication system. Moreover, the role of spatiotemporal modulation profile on the spectral and spatial diversity of OAM states is explored. It is shown that angular‐momentum‐biased metasurfaces allow opportunities for hybridized mode‐division and wavelength‐division multiple access through multiplexing and multicasting across distinct OAM states and wavelengths. The nonreciprocity of topological space‐time photonic transitions across the temporal frequency domain and Hilbert space of OAM states is also investigated giving rise to distinct twisted light channels in up‐ and down‐links.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics · Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications · Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Metamaterials Lab Electrical and Computer Engineering Department Northeastern University Boston MA 02115 USA

Funding

US Air Force Office of Scientific Research

References (95)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1063/1.176867210.1063/1.1768672 ↗
2. 10.1103/PhysRev.50.11510.1103/PhysRev.50.115 ↗
3. 10.1103/PhysRevA.45.818510.1103/PhysRevA.45.8185 ↗
4. 10.1002/978352763536810.1002/9783527635368 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41377-019-0194-210.1038/s41377-019-0194-2 ↗
6. 10.1038/ncomms587610.1038/ncomms5876 ↗
7. 10.1038/nphoton.2012.13810.1038/nphoton.2012.138 ↗
8. 10.1126/science.123786110.1126/science.1237861 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.05390110.1103/PhysRevLett.97.053901 ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevE.88.03320510.1103/PhysRevE.88.033205 ↗
11. 10.1364/OL.21.00082710.1364/OL.21.000827 ↗
12. 10.1080/0950034960823067510.1080/09500349608230675 ↗
13. 10.1038/nphoton.2011.8110.1038/nphoton.2011.81 ↗
14. 10.1038/3508552910.1038/35085529 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.04050110.1103/PhysRevLett.94.040501 ↗
16. 10.1088/2040-8978/13/6/06400810.1088/2040-8978/13/6/064008 ↗
17. 10.1364/OE.24.02624910.1364/OE.24.026249 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2018.11.05310.1016/j.optlastec.2018.11.053 ↗
19. 10.1515/nanoph-2018-007210.1515/nanoph-2018-0072 ↗
20. 10.1016/0030-4018(94)90638-610.1016/0030-4018(94)90638-6 ↗
21. 10.1063/1.365946610.1063/1.3659466 ↗
22. 10.1109/LAWP.2014.238743110.1109/LAWP.2014.2387431 ↗
23. 10.1364/OPTICA.2.00054710.1364/OPTICA.2.000547 ↗
24. 10.1109/LAWP.2016.258697510.1109/LAWP.2016.2586975 ↗
25. 10.2528/PIER1803300610.2528/PIER18033006 ↗
26. 10.1364/OL.43.00314010.1364/OL.43.003140 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.494851910.1063/1.4948519 ↗
28. 10.1126/science.122652810.1126/science.1226528 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.10390110.1103/PhysRevLett.121.103901 ↗
30. 10.1364/OE.25.01849210.1364/OE.25.018492 ↗
31. 10.1364/OE.26.01170810.1364/OE.26.011708 ↗
32. 10.1126/science.121071310.1126/science.1210713 ↗
33. 10.1021/nl404448210.1021/nl4044482 ↗
34. 10.1021/acsphotonics.6b0039210.1021/acsphotonics.6b00392 ↗
35. 10.1364/OE.25.00037710.1364/OE.25.000377 ↗
36. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0175210.1021/acs.nanolett.5b01752 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.carbon.2019.04.03410.1016/j.carbon.2019.04.034 ↗
38. 10.1002/adma.20150453210.1002/adma.201504532 ↗
39. 10.1038/lsa.2017.2710.1038/lsa.2017.27 ↗
40. 10.1002/lpor.20180003110.1002/lpor.201800031 ↗
41. 10.1002/adom.20180167910.1002/adom.201801679 ↗
42. 10.1038/srep0967710.1038/srep09677 ↗
43. 10.1038/srep0966210.1038/srep09662 ↗
44. 10.1002/adma.20160383810.1002/adma.201603838 ↗
45. 10.1002/adfm.20180669210.1002/adfm.201806692 ↗
46. 10.1002/adom.20180181310.1002/adom.201801813 ↗
47. G. K.Shirmanesh R.Sokhoyan P. C.Wu H. A.Atwater arXiv:1910.02069 2019.
48. 10.1109/49.5779810.1109/49.57798 ↗
49. 10.1109/MMM.2019.296360610.1109/MMM.2019.2963606 ↗
50. 10.1109/TAP.2019.294421610.1109/TAP.2019.2944216 ↗
51. 10.1126/science.aat310010.1126/science.aat3100 ↗
52. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.03390110.1103/PhysRevLett.109.033901 ↗
53. 10.1038/ncomms340710.1038/ncomms3407 ↗
54. 10.1364/OME.5.00245910.1364/OME.5.002459 ↗
55. 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.10030410.1103/PhysRevB.92.100304 ↗
56. 10.1109/TAP.2016.263273510.1109/TAP.2016.2632735 ↗
57. 10.1038/s41566-017-0051-x10.1038/s41566-017-0051-x ↗
58. 10.1021/acsphotonics.7b0042010.1021/acsphotonics.7b00420 ↗
59. 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.04541610.1103/PhysRevB.99.045416 ↗
60. S.Taravati G. V.Eleftheriades arXiv:1911.04033 2019.
61. X.Wang A.Diaz‐Rubio H.Li S. A.Tretyakov A.Alù arXiv:1910.11812 2019.
62. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.05405410.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.054054 ↗
63. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.01402410.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.014024 ↗
64. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.20430110.1103/PhysRevLett.121.204301 ↗
65. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.16410210.1103/PhysRevLett.123.164102 ↗
66. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.12.05405210.1103/PhysRevApplied.12.054052 ↗
67. X.Wang C.Caloz arXiv:1909.04480 2019.
68. 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.11542110.1103/PhysRevB.97.115421 ↗
69. 10.1364/OME.9.00016210.1364/OME.9.000162 ↗
70. 10.1002/adom.20190084310.1002/adom.201900843 ↗
71. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.20610110.1103/PhysRevLett.123.206101 ↗
72. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.19390210.1103/PhysRevLett.106.193902 ↗
73. N.Chamanara C.Caloz arXiv:1810.04129 2018.
74. 10.1109/TAP.2019.289170610.1109/TAP.2019.2891706 ↗
75. 10.1088/1367-2630/aaf47a10.1088/1367-2630/aaf47a ↗
76. 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.155110.1103/PhysRevB.59.1551 ↗
77. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.03390410.1103/PhysRevLett.100.033904 ↗
78. Liu M. · Phys. Rev. X · 2018 · 8 · 031077
79. 10.1109/TAP.2019.293861310.1109/TAP.2019.2938613 ↗
80. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.1910.1103/PhysRevLett.61.19 ↗
81. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.321710.1103/PhysRevLett.80.3217 ↗
82. 10.1109/TAP.2019.294371210.1109/TAP.2019.2943712 ↗
83. 10.1109/TAP.2019.295246910.1109/TAP.2019.2952469 ↗
84. 10.1364/OPTICA.4.00100010.1364/OPTICA.4.001000 ↗
85. 10.1364/OE.25.01156410.1364/OE.25.011564 ↗
86. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0035110.1021/acs.nanolett.8b00351 ↗
87. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0055510.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00555 ↗
88. 10.1515/nanoph-2015-000410.1515/nanoph-2015-0004 ↗
89. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0437810.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04378 ↗
90. 10.1002/adom.20170127510.1002/adom.201701275 ↗
91. 10.1515/nanoph-2018-017610.1515/nanoph-2018-0176 ↗
92. 10.1038/s41598-018-38409-210.1038/s41598-018-38409-2 ↗
93. 10.1364/AO.18.00125310.1364/AO.18.001253 ↗
94. 10.1038/srep1540610.1038/srep15406 ↗
95. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.10.04700110.1103/PhysRevApplied.10.047001 ↗