Rational Control of Diffraction and Interference from Conformal Phase Gratings: Toward High‐Resolution 3D Nanopatterning
Source abstract
Abstract
The effective control of the zeroth order diffraction efficiency in phase gratings is a key technique that enables implementation of high‐performance optical elements. An interesting and unexplored application is in the field of phase mask interference lithography, which uses a conformal grating to generate periodic 3D nanopatterns by the optically formed Talbot image. A good understanding of the influence of phase and diffraction on the Talbot image is necessary for achieving rational design of 3D nanopatterns, especially in the regime where the grating periodicity is close to the wavelength and where scalar treatments fail to accurately capture the phase optics. The ability to precisely control diffraction and interference in this regime is illustrated by tuning the grating height in the phase mask up to values that exceed a full phase cycle. These results highlight a powerful degree of freedom and solid guidelines for controlling the structural resolution of optically generated 3D nanopatterns.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Optical Coatings and Gratings · Near-Field Optical Microscopy · Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Science and Engineering KAIST Institute for the Nanocentury Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) Daejeon 305–701 Republic of Korea
Department of Materials Science and Engineering Northwestern University Evanston IL 60202 USA
Funding
Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0031-8914(42)80035-X10.1016/S0031-8914(42)80035-X ↗
2. 10.1016/S0031-8914(42)80079-810.1016/S0031-8914(42)80079-8 ↗
3. 10.1063/1.11898810.1063/1.118988 ↗
4. 10.1116/1.58983610.1116/1.589836 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2004.04.03510.1016/j.jphotochem.2004.04.035 ↗
6. Goodman J. W. · 1968
7. 10.1364/AO.47.00400410.1364/AO.47.004004 ↗
8. 10.1364/AO.42.00693410.1364/AO.42.006934 ↗
9. Catchpole K. R. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 102
10. 10.1063/1.139123210.1063/1.1391232 ↗
11. 10.1073/pnas.040304810110.1073/pnas.0403048101 ↗
12. 10.1021/nl201182410.1021/nl2011824 ↗
13. 10.1088/0957-4484/25/14/14530310.1088/0957-4484/25/14/145303 ↗
14. 10.1002/adma.20070017810.1002/adma.200700178 ↗
15. 10.1364/OE.14.00856810.1364/OE.14.008568 ↗
16. 10.1002/anie.20080417110.1002/anie.200804171 ↗
17. 10.1021/nl080841k10.1021/nl080841k ↗
18. Shir D. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 94
19. 10.1116/1.345618110.1116/1.3456181 ↗
20. Gupta S. · Lasers and Electro‐Optics (CLEO), 2012 Conference on · 2012
21. 10.1002/ange.20070352510.1002/ange.200703525 ↗
22. 10.1021/nl050606r10.1021/nl050606r ↗
23. Park J. · Nature Commun. · 2012 · 3
24. 10.1021/nl08044410.1021/nl080444 ↗
25. 10.1364/OE.20.01109710.1364/OE.20.011097 ↗
26. 10.1002/adma.20100388510.1002/adma.201003885 ↗
27. 10.1002/smll.20100027510.1002/smll.201000275 ↗
28. 10.1002/smll.20120188110.1002/smll.201201881 ↗
29. 10.1080/0950034960823287610.1080/09500349608232876 ↗
30. 10.1109/PROC.1966.486610.1109/PROC.1966.4866 ↗
31. 10.1364/JOSA.72.00138510.1364/JOSA.72.001385 ↗
32. 10.1364/JOSAA.12.00106810.1364/JOSAA.12.001068 ↗
33. 10.1006/jcph.1994.115910.1006/jcph.1994.1159 ↗
34. 10.1116/1.218432110.1116/1.2184321 ↗
35. Catchpole K. R. · J. Appl. Phys · 2007 · 101
36. 10.1364/OE.16.00557710.1364/OE.16.005577 ↗
37. 10.1364/AO.46.00671910.1364/AO.46.006719 ↗
38. 10.1039/c3tc32194k10.1039/c3tc32194k ↗