Deep Silicon Amorphization Induced by Femtosecond Laser Pulses up to the Mid‐Infrared
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Direct laser writing of amorphous lines in crystalline silicon has the potential for becoming a flexible alternative to silicon‐on‐insulator technology for photonic integrated circuits. Yet, the maximum amorphous layer thickness achieved is 60 nm, which is below the requirements for waveguiding at telecom wavelengths. Here, the authors report on different strategies to push the layer thickness beyond today's limit. To this end, irradiation with femtosecond laser pulses covering an extremely broad wavelength range (515 nm–4 µm) up to the yet unexplored near‐ and mid‐infrared region of silicon transparency is investigated. The results show that much thicker amorphous layers can be obtained upon multipulse irradiation at 3‐µm wavelength. The deepest amorphization is achieved in silicon wafers covered with a thick silicon dioxide layer that strongly assists the heat extraction, yielding steep index profiles with a maximum amorphous layer thickness of 128 nm. This superior thickness is compatible with single mode waveguiding for a symmetric waveguide configuration. This study also contributes to a better understanding of the mechanisms involved in laser‐induced amorphization.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Laser Material Processing Techniques · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Aix‐Marseille Université CNRS LP3 UMR 7341 Marseille 13009 France
Laser Processing Group Instituto de Óptica IO‐CSIC Serrano 121 Madrid 28006 Spain
Funding
European Regional Development Fund · European Research Council
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nature0292110.1038/nature02921 ↗
2. 10.1002/adom.20180119110.1002/adom.201801191 ↗
3. 10.1063/1.148605510.1063/1.1486055 ↗
4. 10.1002/adom.20190168010.1002/adom.201901680 ↗
5. 10.1063/1.9070310.1063/1.90703 ↗
6. 10.1007/BF0061666610.1007/BF00616666 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.33736210.1063/1.337362 ↗
8. 10.1063/1.243170910.1063/1.2431709 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.308775410.1063/1.3087754 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0169-4332(03)00881-X10.1016/S0169-4332(03)00881-X ↗
11. 10.1007/s00339-006-3583-310.1007/s00339-006-3583-3 ↗
12. 10.3390/ma1407165110.3390/ma14071651 ↗
13. 10.1088/0957-4484/27/26/26560210.1088/0957-4484/27/26/265602 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.498411010.1063/1.4984110 ↗
15. 10.1038/s41598-017-04891-310.1038/s41598-017-04891-3 ↗
16. J.Colombier A.Rudenko E.Silaeva H.Zhang X.Sedao E.Bévillon S.Reynaud C.Maurice F.Pigeon F.Garrelie R.Stoian J. Rev. Res.2020 043080 1.
17. 10.1038/s41598-018-30269-010.1038/s41598-018-30269-0 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41598-019-56384-010.1038/s41598-019-56384-0 ↗
19. 10.1002/adom.20190070610.1002/adom.201900706 ↗
20. 10.1364/JOSAB.7.00008410.1364/JOSAB.7.000084 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevB.61.264310.1103/PhysRevB.61.2643 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.24530610.1103/PhysRevB.90.245306 ↗
23. 10.1007/s00339010089310.1007/s003390100893 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.19520110.1103/PhysRevB.99.195201 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.73410.1103/PhysRevLett.56.734 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.89610.1103/PhysRevLett.50.896 ↗
27. 10.1007/978-3-642-57813-710.1007/978-3-642-57813-7 ↗
28. 10.1007/s00339-021-04341-y10.1007/s00339-021-04341-y ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.63.208810.1103/PhysRevLett.63.2088 ↗
30. 10.3762/bjnano.4.5910.3762/bjnano.4.59 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.168975610.1063/1.1689756 ↗
32. EIMS: 2‐D Multilayer Waveguide Mode Solver Variational Effective Index Approximation https://www.computational-photonics.eu/eims.html(accessed: January 2021).
33. 10.1364/OE.39898410.1364/OE.398984 ↗
34. 10.12688/openreseurope.13073.110.12688/openreseurope.13073.1 ↗
35. 10.1364/OL.7.00019610.1364/OL.7.000196 ↗
36. 10.1364/OL.38261010.1364/OL.382610 ↗
37. 10.1017/CBO978113964418110.1017/CBO9781139644181 ↗
38. 10.1007/978-1-4615-5247-5_310.1007/978-1-4615-5247-5_3 ↗
39. Palik E. D. · 2012