Property Comparison of Woollen Fabrics with Fusible and Printable Interlinings
Source abstract
Abstract
Suits produced now are high class with good quality due to advanced manufacturing techniques. Woollen fabrics and interlinings are the major materials for suit manufacture. Using woollen fabric and interlining to produce quality fabric has become an important production process. However traditional fusible interlinings are costly and involve a tedious production process, and they have some drawbacks such as strike through and bubbles. In this study, a printable interlining is proposed which can be used in place of fusible interlining. Screen-printing technique directly prints on the shell fabric and it is named printable interlining which enhances quality and reduces operational cost for garment manufacturers. Fabric quality is generally perceived through fabric hand value. Based on a series of laboratory experiments carried out to investigate total hand value and low-stress mechanical properties, this paper compares the impact of fusible interlining and printable interlining on woollen fabric using the Kawabata Evaluation System. Total hand value and five low-stress mechanical properties, tensile, bending, shearing, surface and compression were obtained. The results prove that printable interlinings can replace fusible interlinings on woollen fabrics and improve the fabric total hand value and bending, shearing and tensile properties. Printable interlining can be widely used in mass suit production with simple control process and it is cost-efficient.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Textile materials and evaluations · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Q. Zhang and C. W. Kan, Fiber. Polym., 19, 230 (2018).10.1007/s12221-018-7464-5 ↗
2. S. Jevšnik and J. Geršak, Fibre Text. East. Euro., 12, 47 (2004).
3. Q. Zhang, C. W. Kan, and C. K. Chan, J. Fashion Technol. Text. Eng., 4, 23 (2016).
4. S. Y. Yoon, C. K. Park, H. S. Kim, and S. Kim, Text. Res. J., 80, 1016 (2010).10.1177/0040517509349784 ↗
5. K. Kim, S. Inui, and M. Takatera, Text. Res. J., 81, 598 (2011).10.1177/0040517510387212 ↗
6. S. Khan, S. Tinku, L. Lorenzelli, and R. S. Dahiya, IEEE Sensors J., 15, 3146 (2015).10.1109/JSEN.2014.2368989 ↗
7. K. Phebe, K. Krishnaraj, and B. Chandrasekaran, Indian J. Fibre Text. Res., 39, 380 (2014).
8. K. Kim, S. Inui, and M. Takatera, Text. Res. J., 82, 385 (2012).10.1177/0040517511420764 ↗
9. K. Kim, S. Inui, and M. Takatera, Text. Res. J., 83, 937 (2013).10.1177/0040517513478453 ↗
10. S. S. Lai, Int. J. Cloth. Sci. Technol., 13, 322 (2001).10.1108/09556220110405073 ↗
11. Y. Aleeva and B. Pignataro, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2, 6436 (2014).10.1039/C4TC00618F ↗
12. J. Li, Y. Zhao, H. S. Tan, Y. Guo, C. A. Di, G. Yu, Y. Liu, M. Lin, S. H. Lim, Y. Zhou, and H. Su, Sci. Rep., 2, 754 (2012).10.1038/srep00754 ↗
13. X. Cao, H. Chen, X. Gu, B. Liu, W. Wang, Y. Cao, F. Wu, and C. Zhou, ACS Nano, 8, 12769 (2014).10.1021/nn505979j ↗
14. W. J. Hyun, S. Lim, B. Y. Ahn, J. A. Lewis, C. D. Frisbie, and L. F. Francis, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 7, 12619 (2015).10.1021/acsami.5b02487 ↗
15. W. J. Hyun, E. B. Secor, M. C. Hersam, C. D. Frisbie, and L. F. Francis, Adv. Mater., 27, 109 (2015).10.1002/adma.201404133 ↗
16. J. O. Kim and B. L Slaten, Text. Res. J., 69, 59 (1999).10.1177/004051759906900110 ↗
17. O. N. Hung and C. W. Kan, Polymers, 9, 609 (2017).10.3390/polym9110609 ↗
18. N. Pan, Int. J. Des. Nat. Ecodyn., 1, 48 (2006).
19. B. A. McGregor and M. Naebe, J. Text. Inst., 107, 562 (2016).10.1080/00405000.2015.1046310 ↗
20. S. Kawabata, “The Standardization and Analysis of Hand Evaluation”, 2nd ed., Textile Machinery Society of Japan, 1980.
21. I. Y. Lee, G. E. Jeong, S. R. Kim, C. Bengelsdorff, and S. D. Kim, Color. Technol., 131, 192 (2015).10.1111/cote.12142 ↗
22. K. P. M. Tang, C. W. Kan, J. T. Fan, M. K. Sarkar, and S. L. Tso, Cellulose, 24, 4017 (2017).10.1007/s10570-017-1372-0 ↗
23. D. Sun and G. K. Stylios, Fiber. Polym., 7, 245 (2006).10.1007/BF02875680 ↗
24. Y. L. Lam, C. W. Kan, C. W. Yuen, and C. H. Au, Text. Res. J., 81, 1008 (2011).10.1177/0040517510380777 ↗
25. C. W. Kan and Y. L. Lam, Materials, 6, 314 (2013).10.3390/ma6010314 ↗
26. B. Behera, AUTEX Res. J., 7, 33 (2007).10.1515/aut-2007-070104 ↗
27. D. Sun and G. Stylios, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 173, 172 (2006).10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.11.022 ↗