journal article·2019-07Open access

Magneto‐Optical Metamaterials: Nonreciprocal Transmission and Faraday Effect Enhancement

Bo Fan, Mazhar E. Nasir, Luke H. Nicholls, Anatoly V. Zayats, Viktor A. Podolskiy

Advanced Optical Materials· Volume 7· Issue 14

Abstract

Abstract Magneto‐optical effects are at the heart of modern technologies providing opportunities for polarization control in laser physics and optical communications, metrology, and in high‐density data storage. Here a new type of a hyperbolic magneto‐optical metamaterial based on Au–Ni nanorod arrays is developed. The metamaterial exhibits an enhanced magneto‐optical response with large rotation of the polarization plane and nonreciprocal light transmission. The effective medium model that incorporates both plasmonic and magneto‐optical phenomena in complex multicomponent nanorod media is proposed and validated. The experimental and theoretical results indicate that the magneto‐optical response of the nanostructured metamaterial is drastically enhanced and spectrally modified with respect to bulk ferromagnetic media due to interplay between strong anisotropy and magnetic field induced polarization rotation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications · Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research · Magneto-Optical Properties and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics and Applied Physics University of Massachusetts Lowell Lowell MA 01854 USA

Department of Physics and London Centre for Nanotechnology King's College London Strand, London WC2R 2LS UK

Funding

Army Research Office · Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · European Research Council

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/978-3-662-04143-710.1007/978-3-662-04143-7 ↗
2. 10.1038/nphoton.2013.18510.1038/nphoton.2013.185 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41566-017-0048-510.1038/s41566-017-0048-5 ↗
4. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.02390210.1103/PhysRevLett.100.023902 ↗
5. 10.1063/1.494365110.1063/1.4943651 ↗
6. 10.1364/OE.21.01490710.1364/OE.21.014907 ↗
7. 10.1364/OE.26.01784110.1364/OE.26.017841 ↗
8. 10.1002/adma.20130595810.1002/adma.201305958 ↗
9. 10.1364/OE.21.01504810.1364/OE.21.015048 ↗
10. 10.1038/nphoton.2013.24310.1038/nphoton.2013.243 ↗
11. 10.1364/JOSAB.23.00049810.1364/JOSAB.23.000498 ↗
12. 10.1098/rspa.1979.016010.1098/rspa.1979.0160 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.163084010.1063/1.1630840 ↗
14. Dentz D. J. · AIP Proc. · 1974 · 18 · 18954
15. 10.1063/1.9799610.1063/1.97996 ↗
16. 10.1557/mrc.2016.510.1557/mrc.2016.5 ↗
17. 10.1126/science.121917110.1126/science.1219171 ↗
18. 10.1038/lsa.2016.27310.1038/lsa.2016.273 ↗
19. Landau L. D. · 1980
20. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.16740110.1103/PhysRevLett.97.167401 ↗
21. 10.1063/1.498506410.1063/1.4985064 ↗
22. Rytov S. M. · Sov. Phys. JETP · 1956 · 2 · 466
23. 10.1364/JOSA.67.00042310.1364/JOSA.67.000423 ↗
24. Krinchik G. S. · Sov. Phys. JETP · 1968 · 26 · 1080
25. 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.21443610.1103/PhysRevB.92.214436 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.492640910.1063/1.4926409 ↗
27. 10.1038/s41566-017-0002-610.1038/s41566-017-0002-6 ↗
28. Comsol Multiphysics COMSOL AB.
29. 10.1017/CBO978051161335710.1017/CBO9780511613357 ↗