Accessing the High‐Q Dark Plasmonic Fano Resonances in Superconductor Metasurfaces
Source abstract
Abstract
Superconducting metamaterials at terahertz frequencies has provided a platform for designing switchable plasmonic metamaterial devices. However, since metals at terahertz frequencies are excellent conductors, the superior role of superconductors in designing low‐loss, high quality factor metamaterials remains unclear. In this work, a low asymmetry Fano resonant split‐ring‐resonator is considered in which a regime of extremely low radiative loss is identified where the high temperature yttrium barium copper oxide superconductor meta‐atom supports a sharp high quality factor Fano resonance while an identical metallic resonator does not show the resonance behavior. The radiative and the nonradiative losses are comparable in low asymmetry Fano resonant meta‐atoms. The observation of high quality factor Fano resonance behavior clearly establishes the utility of superconductors over metals in designing lower loss plasmonic metamaterials at terahertz frequencies that may have multifunctional applications in areas that require strong light–matter interactions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications · Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research · Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Division of Physics and Applied Physics School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences Nanyang Technological University 21 Nanyang Link Singapore 637371
Center for Disruptive Photonic Technologies The Photonics Institute Nanyang Technological University 50 Nanyang Avenue Singapore 639798
Funding
Nanyang Technological University · Ministry of Education - Singapore
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1070/PU1968v010n04ABEH00369910.1070/PU1968v010n04ABEH003699 ↗
2. 10.1109/22.79800210.1109/22.798002 ↗
3. 10.1126/science.105884710.1126/science.1058847 ↗
4. 10.1126/science.109402510.1126/science.1094025 ↗
5. 10.1126/science.113362810.1126/science.1133628 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.396610.1103/PhysRevLett.85.3966 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.489559510.1063/1.4895595 ↗
8. 10.1063/1.490610910.1063/1.4906109 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.04740110.1103/PhysRevLett.101.047401 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.474579010.1063/1.4745790 ↗
11. 10.1002/adma.20160161110.1002/adma.201601611 ↗
12. 10.1002/adom.20160035610.1002/adom.201600356 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.14740110.1103/PhysRevLett.99.147401 ↗
14. 10.1038/nmat281010.1038/nmat2810 ↗
15. 10.1364/OL.37.00336610.1364/OL.37.003366 ↗
16. 10.1063/1.489831410.1063/1.4898314 ↗
17. 10.1063/1.481881710.1063/1.4818817 ↗
18. 10.1109/TTHZ.2013.228549810.1109/TTHZ.2013.2285498 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.495545410.1063/1.4955454 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.494364910.1063/1.4943649 ↗
21. 10.1364/OE.18.00901510.1364/OE.18.009015 ↗
22. 10.1063/1.347990910.1063/1.3479909 ↗
23. 10.1088/2040-8978/13/2/02400110.1088/2040-8978/13/2/024001 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.04390110.1103/PhysRevLett.107.043901 ↗
25. 10.1063/1.331394110.1063/1.3313941 ↗
26. 10.1021/ph500104k10.1021/ph500104k ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRev.124.186610.1103/PhysRev.124.1866 ↗
28. 10.1364/OE.19.00631210.1364/OE.19.006312 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.473994510.1063/1.4739945 ↗
30. 10.1364/OE.18.01340710.1364/OE.18.013407 ↗
31. 10.1126/science.119825810.1126/science.1198258 ↗
32. 10.1063/1.490519910.1063/1.4905199 ↗
33. 10.1364/OL.33.00150610.1364/OL.33.001506 ↗
34. 10.1063/1.491953110.1063/1.4919531 ↗
35. 10.1063/1.365949410.1063/1.3659494 ↗
36. Cong L. · Adv. Opt. Mater. · 2015 · 3 · 1534
37. 10.1002/adom.20150050410.1002/adom.201500504 ↗
38. 10.1364/OE.18.01750410.1364/OE.18.017504 ↗
39. 10.1063/1.365324210.1063/1.3653242 ↗
40. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.24740210.1103/PhysRevLett.105.247402 ↗
41. 10.1515/nanoph-2012-000710.1515/nanoph-2012-0007 ↗
42. 10.1063/1.481781410.1063/1.4817814 ↗
43. 10.1063/1.481938910.1063/1.4819389 ↗