Observation of Ultrafast Exciton–Exciton Annihilation in CsPbBr3 Quantum Dots
Source abstract
Abstract
Excited-state dynamics of CsPbBr3 quantum dots (QDs) are studied through femtosecond transient absorption spectroscopy measurements. The band-edge recombination is dominated by a single exciton process at low excitation density (<0.1 exciton QD−1). While a density-dependent quadratic decay is found in early probe decay at high excitation density (>0.25 exciton QD−1), which is attributed to exciton–exciton annihilation. Moreover, ultrafast biexcitons and slow trap-state excitons are also found with resonant energy slightly below the band edge. As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re-organized for online delivery, but are not copy-edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Optical properties and cooling technologies in crystalline materials · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Optoelectronic Science and Engineering National University of Defense Technology Changsha 410073 China
Interdisciplinary Center of Quantum Information National University of Defense Technology Changsha 410073 China
State Key Laboratory of High Performance Computing National University of Defense Technology Changsha 410073 China
Funding
National University of Defense Technology
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/jz400892a10.1021/jz400892a ↗
2. 10.1002/pip.257310.1002/pip.2573 ↗
3. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0115410.1021/acsnano.5b01154 ↗
4. 10.1002/advs.20150019410.1002/advs.201500194 ↗
5. 10.1021/ja410920910.1021/ja4109209 ↗
6. 10.1021/nl504877910.1021/nl5048779 ↗
7. 10.1021/jacs.5b0560210.1021/jacs.5b05602 ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0240410.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02404 ↗
9. 10.1002/anie.20150827610.1002/anie.201508276 ↗
10. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0458410.1021/acsnano.5b04584 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0576910.1021/acsnano.5b05769 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsphotonics.6b0018710.1021/acsphotonics.6b00187 ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b0246010.1021/acs.jpclett.5b02460 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0411010.1021/acs.nanolett.5b04110 ↗
15. 10.1038/ncomms905610.1038/ncomms9056 ↗
16. 10.1002/adma.20157030210.1002/adma.201570302 ↗
17. 10.1021/jacs.5b0852010.1021/jacs.5b08520 ↗
18. 10.1021/jp994413210.1021/jp9944132 ↗
19. 10.1021/nl060199z10.1021/nl060199z ↗
20. 10.1021/ar800112v10.1021/ar800112v ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevB.32.660110.1103/PhysRevB.32.6601 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.05640410.1103/PhysRevLett.91.056404 ↗
23. 10.1126/science.287.5455.101110.1126/science.287.5455.1011 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.811010.1103/PhysRevB.50.8110 ↗
25. 10.1063/1.10883310.1063/1.108833 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.811010.1103/PhysRevB.50.8110 ↗
27. 10.1021/cg400645t10.1021/cg400645t ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.12542710.1103/PhysRevB.89.125427 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.15740210.1103/PhysRevLett.94.157402 ↗
30. 10.1038/nphoton.2014.17110.1038/nphoton.2014.171 ↗
31. 10.1021/nl502197510.1021/nl5021975 ↗
32. 10.1021/ja506624n10.1021/ja506624n ↗
33. 10.1364/OE.23.02431710.1364/OE.23.024317 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevB.35.811310.1103/PhysRevB.35.8113 ↗
35. 10.1117/12.202287710.1117/12.2022877 ↗
36. 10.1021/jp102101f10.1021/jp102101f ↗
37. 10.1021/jp808291u10.1021/jp808291u ↗
38. Pooja T. · J. Chem. Phys. · 2011 · 134 · 1754
39. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.261210.1103/PhysRevLett.72.2612 ↗