Inverse Design in Nanophotonics via Representation Learning
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Inverse design in nanophotonics, the computational discovery of structures achieving targeted electromagnetic (EM) responses, has become a key tool for recent optical advances. Traditional intuition‐driven or iterative optimization methods struggle with the inherently high‐dimensional, non‐convex design spaces and the substantial computational demands of EM simulations. Recently, machine learning (ML) has emerged to address these bottlenecks effectively. This review frames ML‐enhanced inverse design methodologies through the lens of representation learning , classifying them into two categories: output‐side and input‐side approaches. Output‐side methods use ML to learn a representation in the solution space to create a differentiable solver that accelerates optimization. Conversely, input‐side techniques employ ML to learn compact, latent‐space representations of feasible device geometries, enabling efficient global exploration through generative models. Each strategy presents unique trade‐offs in data requirements, generalization capacity, and novel design discovery potentials. Hybrid frameworks that combine physics‐based optimization with data‐driven representations help escape poor local optima, improve scalability, and facilitate knowledge transfer. Data efficiency, transferable representations, fabrication‐aware design, faster solvers, and hybrid multiphysics co‐design are emphasized.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications · Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing · Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Electrical and Computer Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta GA 30332‐0001 USA
School of Computational Science and Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta GA 30332‐0001 USA
Funding
National Science Foundation
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41563-025-02121-010.1038/s41563-025-02121-0 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41467-024-46741-710.1038/s41467-024-46741-7 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41467-021-26443-010.1038/s41467-021-26443-0 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41467-022-29973-310.1038/s41467-022-29973-3 ↗
5. O.Hemmatyar S.Abdollahramezani I.Zeimpekis S.Lepeshov A.Krasnok A. I.Khan K. M.Neilson C.Teichrib T.Brown E.Pop D. W.Hewak M.Wuttig A.Alu O. L.Muskens A.Adibi arXiv preprint2021 arXiv:2107.12159.
6. 10.1038/s41467-021-21664-910.1038/s41467-021-21664-9 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41467-021-21664-910.1038/s41467-021-21664-9 ↗
8. 10.1038/s41566-024-01394-210.1038/s41566-024-01394-2 ↗
9. 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.328709410.1109/ACCESS.2023.3287094 ↗
10. 10.1364/OE.40438610.1364/OE.404386 ↗
11. 10.1126/science.aau194910.1126/science.aau1949 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41467-022-33244-610.1038/s41467-022-33244-6 ↗
13. S.Abdollahramezani D.Omo‐Lamai G.Bosman O.Hemmatyar S.Dagli V.Dolia K.Chang N. A.Güsken H. C.Delgado G.‐J.Boons M. L.Brongersma F.Safir B. T.Khuri‐Yakub P.Moradifar J.Dionne arXiv preprint2024 arXiv–2411.
14. 10.1038/s41565-024-01697-z10.1038/s41565-024-01697-z ↗
15. 10.1038/s41377-023-01253-910.1038/s41377-023-01253-9 ↗
16. 10.3390/photonics1009099310.3390/photonics10090993 ↗
17. 10.1515/nanoph-2022-027110.1515/nanoph-2022-0271 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41467-022-29374-610.1038/s41467-022-29374-6 ↗
19. J.Hadamard Princeton University Bulletin Princeton1902 49‐54.
20. 10.1515/nanoph-2023-052710.1515/nanoph-2023-0527 ↗
21. D.Sell Ph.D. thesisAdjoint Optimization of Free‐space Metasurfaces Stanford University California2019.
22. Kunz K. S. · 1993
23. 10.1002/978111856976410.1002/9781118569764 ↗
24. Zoric D. P. · 2011 · 1
25. 10.1038/s41467-025-56122-310.1038/s41467-025-56122-3 ↗
26. 10.1038/s41566-018-0246-910.1038/s41566-018-0246-9 ↗
27. 10.1002/adfm.20210174810.1002/adfm.202101748 ↗
28. 10.1002/978111985392310.1002/9781119853923 ↗
29. Z.Hao S.Liu Y.Zhang C.Ying Y.Feng H.Su J.Zhu arXiv preprint2022 arXiv:2211.08064.
30. 10.1364/PRJ.41596010.1364/PRJ.415960 ↗
31. 10.1515/nanoph-2020-037610.1515/nanoph-2020-0376 ↗
32. 10.1038/s41578-020-00260-110.1038/s41578-020-00260-1 ↗
33. 10.1038/s41377-023-01218-y10.1038/s41377-023-01218-y ↗
34. Bendsøe M. P. · 2013
35. 10.1364/JOSAB.40604810.1364/JOSAB.406048 ↗
36. 10.1364/OE.27.01576510.1364/OE.27.015765 ↗
37. R.Pestourie arXiv preprint2025 arXiv:2503.20065.
38. Pestourie R. J.‐M. F. · 2020
39. 10.1038/s42005-021-00568-610.1038/s42005-021-00568-6 ↗
40. 10.1364/OE.41913810.1364/OE.419138 ↗
41. 10.1515/nanoph-2024-012710.1515/nanoph-2024-0127 ↗
42. Gershnabel E. · ACS Photonics · 2022 · 10 · 815
43. 10.1038/s41377-024-01629-510.1038/s41377-024-01629-5 ↗
44. 10.1038/s41566-022-01086-910.1038/s41566-022-01086-9 ↗
45. J. M.Hiesener C. A.Kaylor J. J.Wong P.Agarwal S. E.Ralph arXiv preprint2025 arXiv:2503.00199.
46. 10.1021/acsphotonics.0c0069910.1021/acsphotonics.0c00699 ↗
47. 10.1515/nanoph-2025-006710.1515/nanoph-2025-0067 ↗
48. 10.1021/acsphotonics.8b0152210.1021/acsphotonics.8b01522 ↗
49. 10.1126/sciadv.aar420610.1126/sciadv.aar4206 ↗
50. 10.1515/nanoph-2019-047410.1515/nanoph-2019-0474 ↗
51. 10.1038/s41524-020-0276-y10.1038/s41524-020-0276-y ↗
52. 10.1002/aisy.20190013210.1002/aisy.201900132 ↗
53. 10.1002/adts.20190008810.1002/adts.201900088 ↗
54. 10.1021/acsphotonics.1c0188810.1021/acsphotonics.1c01888 ↗
55. 10.1021/acsphotonics.9b0096610.1021/acsphotonics.9b00966 ↗
56. An S. · Opt. Express · 2020 · 28
57. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b0185710.1021/acs.nanolett.9b01857 ↗
58. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0317110.1021/acs.nanolett.8b03171 ↗
59. 10.1021/acsphotonics.0c0053910.1021/acsphotonics.0c00539 ↗
60. 10.1515/nanoph-2022-069210.1515/nanoph-2022-0692 ↗
61. 10.1515/nanoph-2023-085210.1515/nanoph-2023-0852 ↗
62. 10.1364/OE.27.00587410.1364/OE.27.005874 ↗
63. 10.1021/acsphotonics.7b0137710.1021/acsphotonics.7b01377 ↗
64. 10.1021/acsphotonics.2c0087610.1021/acsphotonics.2c00876 ↗
65. 10.1088/2632-2153/acd61910.1088/2632-2153/acd619 ↗
66. 10.1515/nanoph-2021-066010.1515/nanoph-2021-0660 ↗
67. M.Mitchell An Introduction to Genetic algorithms MIT press Cambridge1998.
68. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c0306910.1021/acs.nanolett.4c03069 ↗
69. 10.1364/OE.47170610.1364/OE.471706 ↗
70. R. S.Sutton A. G.Barto Reinforcement learning: An introduction vol.1 MIT press Cambridge 1998.
71. Marzban R. · Small Methods · 202510.1002/smtd.202500975 ↗
72. 10.1007/s00158-022-03347-110.1007/s00158-022-03347-1 ↗
73. 10.1021/acsphotonics.0c0032710.1021/acsphotonics.0c00327 ↗
74. 10.1117/12.305263910.1117/12.3052639 ↗
75. 10.1515/nanoph-2024-053610.1515/nanoph-2024-0536 ↗
76. 10.1137/21M139790810.1137/21M1397908 ↗
77. 10.1038/s44172-023-00107-x10.1038/s44172-023-00107-x ↗
78. 10.1038/s42256-023-00761-y10.1038/s42256-023-00761-y ↗
79. 10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.04510.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045 ↗
80. 10.1063/5.007161610.1063/5.0071616 ↗
81. 10.1364/OE.38487510.1364/OE.384875 ↗
82. 10.1364/OE.27.03244510.1364/OE.27.032445 ↗
83. 10.1038/s41467-019-12698-110.1038/s41467-019-12698-1 ↗
84. 10.1364/OL.42562710.1364/OL.425627 ↗
85. I.Goodfellow Y.Bengio A.Courville Deep learning. Vol. 1. No. 2 Cambridge: MIT press 2016.
86. 10.1002/adma.20190111110.1002/adma.201901111 ↗
87. 10.1021/acsphotonics.4c0208110.1021/acsphotonics.4c02081 ↗
88. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0317110.1021/acs.nanolett.8b03171 ↗
89. 10.1186/s40323-023-00252-010.1186/s40323-023-00252-0 ↗
90. 10.1038/s41566-020-0685-y10.1038/s41566-020-0685-y ↗
91. M.Arjovsky S.Chintala L.Bottou inInt. conf. on machine learning.PMLR Cambridge2017 214–223.
92. 10.1038/s41524-020-0276-y10.1038/s41524-020-0276-y ↗
93. Jackson J. D. · 1998 · 29
94. I.Higgins L.Matthey A.Pal C.Burgess X.Glorot M.Botvinick S.Mohamed A.Lerchner inInt. conf. on learning representationsVienna Austria2017.
95. Chen R. T. · Adv. Neural. Inf. Process. Syst. · 2018 · 31
96. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.01050810.1103/PhysRevLett.124.010508 ↗
97. 10.1039/D3DD00177F10.1039/D3DD00177F ↗
98. Mal P. · 2025 · 1
99. 10.2528/PIER2309020110.2528/PIER23090201 ↗
100. 10.1364/OME.44260510.1364/OME.442605 ↗