Substrate‐Induced Maximum Optical Chirality of Planar Dielectric Structures
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Resonant dielectric planar structures can interact selectively with light of particular helicity thus providing an attractive platform for chiral flat optics. The absence of mirror‐symmetry planes defines geometric chirality, and it remains the main condition for achieving strong circular dichroism. For planar optical structures such as photonic‐crystal slabs and metasurfaces, breaking the out‐of‐plane mirror symmetry is especially challenging, as it requires to fabricate meta‐atoms with a tilt, variable height, or vertically shifted positions. Although transparent substrates formally break out‐of‐plane mirror symmetries, their optical effect is typically subtle being rarely considered for enhancing optical chirality. Here it is revealed that low‐refractive‐index substrates can induce up to maximum intrinsic optical chirality in otherwise achiral metastructures so that the transparency to waves of one helicity is combined with resonant blocking of waves of the opposite helicity. This effect originates from engineering twisted photonic eigenstates of different parities. The perturbation analysis developed in terms of the resonant‐state expansion reveals how the eigenstate coupling induced by a substrate gives rise to a pair of chiral resonances of opposite handedness. The general theory is confirmed by the specific examples of light transmission in the normal and oblique directions by a rotation‐symmetric photonic‐crystal slab placed on different transparent substrates.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Photonic Crystals and Applications · Optical Coatings and Gratings · Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Shubnikov Institute of Crystallography NRC “Kurchatov Institute” Moscow 119333 Russia
National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute) Moscow 115409 Russia
Chair in Hybrid Nanosystems Ludwig‐Maximilians‐University of Munich 80539 Munich Germany
School of Physics and Astronomy Cardiff University Cardiff CF24 3AA UK
Nonlinear Physics Centre Australian National University Canberra ACT 2601 Australia
Funding
Russian Science Foundation · Australian Research Council
References (63)
Show source-provided references
1. Herschel J. W. F. · Trans. Camb. Philos. Soc. · 1822 · 1 · 43
2. Fresnel A.‐J. · Bull. Sci. Soc. Philomath · 1824 · 147
3. Kelvin W. T. B. · 1894
4. Polavarapu P. · 2018
5. 10.1021/acsphotonics.2c0044510.1021/acsphotonics.2c00445 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41467-017-02088-w10.1038/s41467-017-02088-w ↗
7. 10.1038/nature2103710.1038/nature21037 ↗
8. 10.1126/science.117703110.1126/science.1177031 ↗
9. 10.1039/c3nr02666c10.1039/c3nr02666c ↗
10. 10.1063/1.482974010.1063/1.4829740 ↗
11. 10.1364/OE.22.01993610.1364/OE.22.019936 ↗
12. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0258310.1021/acs.nanolett.6b02583 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.274520310.1063/1.2745203 ↗
14. 10.1364/OL.35.00159310.1364/OL.35.001593 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.487696410.1063/1.4876964 ↗
16. 10.1063/1.488079810.1063/1.4880798 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.19541810.1103/PhysRevB.93.195418 ↗
18. 10.1038/lsa.2017.15810.1038/lsa.2017.158 ↗
19. 10.1038/s41598-018-29977-410.1038/s41598-018-29977-4 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsnano.0c0729510.1021/acsnano.0c07295 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.09390310.1103/PhysRevLett.125.093903 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.07300110.1103/PhysRevLett.126.073001 ↗
23. 10.1002/adom.20210079710.1002/adom.202100797 ↗
24. 10.1126/science.abq787010.1126/science.abq7870 ↗
25. 10.1038/s41586-022-05467-610.1038/s41586-022-05467-6 ↗
26. 10.1038/s41377-023-01295-z10.1038/s41377-023-01295-z ↗
27. Fernandez‐Corbaton I. · Phys. Rev. X · 2016 · 6
28. 10.1063/1.348648010.1063/1.3486480 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.19530410.1103/PhysRevB.91.195304 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsphotonics.0c0000310.1021/acsphotonics.0c00003 ↗
31. I.Toftul P.Tonkaev K.Koshelev F.Lai Q.Song M.Gorkunov Y.Kivshar arXiv:2406.113002024.
32. 10.1038/s41377-020-0256-510.1038/s41377-020-0256-5 ↗
33. 10.1038/s41467-022-32770-710.1038/s41467-022-32770-7 ↗
34. 10.1016/B978-0-32-395195-1.00014-410.1016/B978-0-32-395195-1.00014-4 ↗
35. 10.1209/0295-5075/92/5001010.1209/0295-5075/92/50010 ↗
36. 10.1364/OL.43.00197810.1364/OL.43.001978 ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.04512910.1103/PhysRevB.96.045129 ↗
38. 10.1021/acsnano.1c0979610.1021/acsnano.1c09796 ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.L08140110.1103/PhysRevB.107.L081401 ↗
40. 10.1103/PhysRevB.109.L04141010.1103/PhysRevB.109.L041410 ↗
41. 10.1103/PhysRevB.52.798210.1103/PhysRevB.52.7982 ↗
42. 10.1002/lpor.20150022210.1002/lpor.201500222 ↗
43. 10.1038/s41467-022-35246-w10.1038/s41467-022-35246-w ↗
44. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.25740110.1103/PhysRevLett.113.257401 ↗
45. C. W.Hsu B.Zhen M.Soljačić A. D.Stone arXiv:1708.021972017.
46. 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.01320910.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.013209 ↗
47. Baz' A. · 1969
48. 10.1364/JOSAA.20.00056910.1364/JOSAA.20.000569 ↗
49. 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.08543310.1103/PhysRevB.98.085433 ↗
50. Kim K. · Adv. Opt. Mater. · 2021 · 9 · 22
51. 10.1364/OE.47506010.1364/OE.475060 ↗
52. 10.1103/PhysRevB.108.15541010.1103/PhysRevB.108.155410 ↗
53. Luo X. · Laser Photonics Rev. · 2023 · 17 · 10
54. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c0216810.1021/acs.nanolett.3c02168 ↗
55. 10.1021/acsphotonics.2c0192610.1021/acsphotonics.2c01926 ↗
56. 10.1021/acsphotonics.2c0013410.1021/acsphotonics.2c00134 ↗
57. 10.1002/adom.20140058410.1002/adom.201400584 ↗
58. 10.1364/PRJ.49795410.1364/PRJ.497954 ↗
59. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.14610210.1103/PhysRevLett.128.146102 ↗
60. 10.1002/adom.20230319510.1002/adom.202303195 ↗
61. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.19390310.1103/PhysRevLett.121.193903 ↗
62. 10.1007/978-3-319-42264-010.1007/978-3-319-42264-0 ↗
63. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c0240210.1021/acs.nanolett.4c02402 ↗