Effect of Thread Count on the Shear Mechanical Properties and Dynamic Mechanical Properties of Shape Memory Polymer Reinforced by Single-Ply Weave Fabric
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer composites and self-healing · Advanced Materials and Mechanics · Photochromic and Fluorescence Chemistry
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. Wang K, Jia Y-G, Zhao C, Zhu XX. Multiple and two-way reversible shape memory polymers: Design strategies and applications. Prog Mater Sci 2019;105:100572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.100572.10.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.100572 ↗
2. N. Zheng, G. Fang, Z. Cao, Q. Zhao, T. Xie, High strain epoxy shape memory polymer. Polym. Chem. 6, 3046–3053 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/C5PY00172B10.1039/C5PY00172B ↗
3. J. Gao, W. Chen, B. Yu, P. Fan, B. Zhao, J. Hu, D. Zhang, G. Fang, F. Peng, Effect of temperature on the mechanical behaviours of a single-ply weave-reinforced shape memory polymer composite. Compos. Part B Eng. 159, 336–345 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.09.02910.1016/j.compositesb.2018.09.029 ↗
4. Guo A, Kong D, Zhou X, Kong H, Qu P, Wang S, Wang H, Hu Y. Method for preparing damage-resistant 3D-printed ceramics via interior-to-exterior strengthening and toughening. Addit. Manuf. 2022;60:103272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2022.103272.10.1016/j.addma.2022.103272 ↗
5. Guo S, Wang M, Sui S, Li J, Chen H, Hao X, Zhao X, Lin X. Research on optimizing strength and ductility of HfNbTaZr dual-phase high-entropy alloy by tuning chemical short-range order. Int. J. Refract Met. Hard Mater. 2022;108:105942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2022.105942.10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2022.105942 ↗
6. Y. Qian, J. Shi, H. Sun, Y. Chen, Q. Wang, Vector solid texture synthesis using unified RBF-based representation and optimization. Vis. Comput. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00371-022-02541-y10.1007/s00371-022-02541-y ↗
7. Luo L, Zhang F, Leng J. Multi-performance shape memory epoxy resins and their composites with narrow transition temperature range. Compos Sci Technol 2021;213:108899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.108899.10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.108899 ↗
8. M.J. Jo, H. Choi, G.H. Kim, W.-R. Yu, M. Park, Y. Kim, J. Park, J. Youk, Preparation of epoxy shape memory polymers for deployable space structures using flexible diamines. Fibers. Polym. 19, 1799–1805 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-018-8549-510.1007/s12221-018-8549-5 ↗
9. J. Hu, W. Chen, P. Fan, J. Gao, G. Fang, Z. Cao, G. Fang, Z. Cao, D. Peng, Uniaxial tensile tests and dynamic mechanical analysis of satin weave reinforced epoxy shape memory polymer composite. Polym. Test 64, 235–241 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.09.03810.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.09.038 ↗
10. P. Turner, T. Liu, X. Zeng, K. Brown, Three-dimensional woven carbon fibre polymer composite beams and plates under ballistic impact. Compos. Struct. 185, 483–495 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.10.09110.1016/j.compstruct.2017.10.091 ↗
11. Guo L, Liao F, Xu Y, Wang T, Yang C, Yuan J. Experimental method and failure mechanisms investigation for out-of-plane shear fatigue behavior of 3D woven composites. Int. J. Fatigue 2020;134:105501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105501.10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105501 ↗
12. R. Mishra, J. Militky, N. Gupta, R. Pachauri, B.K. Behera, Modelling and simulation of earthquake resistant 3D woven textile structural concrete composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 81, 91–97 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.07.00810.1016/j.compositesb.2015.07.008 ↗
13. Thakre P, Lagoudas D, Zhu J, Barrera E, Gates T. Processing and Characterization of Epoxy/SWCNT/Woven Fabric Composites. 47th AIAAASMEASCEAHSASC Struct. Struct. Dyn. Mater. Conf. 14th AIAAASMEAHS Adapt. Struct. Conf. 7th, Newport, Rhode Island: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics; 2006. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2006-1857.10.2514/6.2006-1857 ↗
14. S. Jiang, A. Greiner, S. Agarwal, Short nylon-6 nanofiber reinforced transparent and high modulus thermoplastic polymeric composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 87, 164–169 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.08.01110.1016/j.compscitech.2013.08.011 ↗
15. S. Wang, J. Zhang, A. Guo, S. Liang, Buckling performance of co-cured and stiffened composite structure with embedded multilayer damping membranes. Polym. Compos. 43, 7403–7419 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2682110.1002/pc.26821 ↗
16. I. Goda, Z. Zubair, G. L’Hostis, J.-Y. Drean, Design and characterization of 3D multilayer woven reinforcements shape memory polymer composites. J. Compos. Mater. 55, 653–673 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/002199832095817810.1177/0021998320958178 ↗
17. T. Gereke, O. Döbrich, M. Hübner, C. Cherif, Experimental and computational composite textile reinforcement forming: a review. Compos. Part Appl. Sci. Manuf. 46, 1–10 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.10.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2012.10.004 ↗
18. L. Santo, F. Quadrini, P.L. Ganga, V. Zolesi, Mission BION-M1: Results of RIBES/FOAM2 experiment on shape memory polymer foams and composites. Aerosp. Sci Technol 40, 109–114 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2014.11.00810.1016/j.ast.2014.11.008 ↗
19. L. Puig, A. Barton, N. Rando, A review on large deployable structures for astrophysics missions. Acta. Astronaut. 67, 12–26 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2010.02.02110.1016/j.actaastro.2010.02.021 ↗
20. Liu Y, Du H, Liu L, Leng J. Shape memory polymers and their composites in aerospace applications: a review. Smart Mater. Struct. 2014;23:023001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/23/2/023001.10.1088/0964-1726/23/2/023001 ↗
21. Lu H, Li Z, Qi X, Xu L, Chi Z, Duan D, Islam M, Wang W, Jin X, Zhu Y, Fu Y, Cui L, Zhuang Y, Dong Y. Flexible, electrothermal-driven controllable carbon fiber/poly(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate) shape memory composites for electromagnetic shielding. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2021;207:108697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.108697.10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.108697 ↗
22. J. Gao, W. Chen, P. Fan, B. Zhao, J. Hu, D. Zhang, Q. Fang, F. Peng, Experimental determination of mechanical properties of a single-ply broken twill 1/3 weave reinforced shape memory polymer composite. Polym. Test 69, 100–106 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.05.00210.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.05.002 ↗
23. P. Qu, Y. Wan, C. Bao, Q. Sun, G. Fang, J. Takahashi, A new numerical method for the mechanical analysis of chopped carbon fiber tape-reinforced thermoplastics. Compos. Struct. 201, 857–866 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.11010.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.110 ↗
24. G. Fang, P. Qu, Z. Cao, F. Shi, Mechanical analysis of woven composites through experimental investigation and multiscale numerical simulation. Fibers Polym. 23, 1440–1453 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-022-4061-z10.1007/s12221-022-4061-z ↗
25. Qu P, Wan Y, Fang G, Guo A, Liu G, Takahashi J. A novel heterogeneous-particle model based on peridynamics for flexural mechanical properties of randomly oriented fiber reinforced composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2022;243:110140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110140.10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110140 ↗
26. Wang B, Fang G, Wang H, Liang J, Dai F, Meng S. Uncertainty modelling and multiscale simulation of woven composite twisted structure. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2022;217:109118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.109118.10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.109118 ↗
27. Ying Z, Pan X, Wu Z, Pan Z, Cheng X. Effect of the micro-structure on the compressive failure behavior of three-dimensional orthogonal woven composites. Compos Struct 2022;297:115892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115892.10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115892 ↗
28. Kim D-H, Kim S-W, Lee I. Evaluation of curing process-induced deformation in plain woven composite structures based on cure kinetics considering various fabric parameters. Compos Struct 2022;287:115379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115379.10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115379 ↗
29. Zhou G, Sun Q, Meng Z, Li D, Peng Y, Zeng D, Su X. Experimental investigation on the effects of fabric architectures on mechanical and damage behaviors of carbon/epoxy woven composites. Compos. Struct. 2021;257:113366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113366.10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113366 ↗
30. Zhou G, Sun Q, Li D, Meng Z, Peng Y, Zeng D, Su X. Effects of fabric architectures on mechanical and damage behaviors in carbon/epoxy woven composites under multiaxial stress states. Polym. Test 2020;90:106657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106657.10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106657 ↗
31. Wang Y, Zhou Y, Jin C. An analytical nonlinear model for plain-woven composites under off-axis loads. Compos. Struct. 2022;296:115905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115905.10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115905 ↗
32. Xiao Y, Zhang X, Ghosh S. Parametrically-upscaled continuum damage mechanics (PUCDM) model for plain weave woven composites: part I model development. Compos. Struct. 2022;296:115825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115825.10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115825 ↗
33. Nasri M, Abbassi F, Garnier C, Labanieh AR, Dalverny O, Zghal A. Analysis of woven fabrics forming through a comparison between discrete elastic and hypoelastic approaches based on mesoscale structure. Compos. Struct. 2022;284:115149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.115149.10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.115149 ↗
34. J. Leng, X. Lan, Y. Liu, S. Du, Shape-memory polymers and their composites: Stimulus methods and applications. Prog. Mater. Sci. 56, 1077–1135 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.03.00110.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.03.001 ↗
35. Zhao Y, Song J, Wen W, Cui H, Li C, Liu S. Thermo-mechanical behaviors of 2.5D shallow straight-link-shaped woven composites under the warp direction fatigue loading at room and elevated temperatures. Compos. Struct. 2022;289:115489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115489.10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115489 ↗
36. Z. Zhao, X. Chen, X. Wang, Deformation behavior of woven glass/epoxy composite substrate under thermo-mechanical loading. Mater. Des. 82, 130–135 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.05.04810.1016/j.matdes.2015.05.048 ↗
37. Z. Murčinková, P. Postawa, J. Winczek, Parameters influence on the dynamic properties of polymer-matrix composites reinforced by fibres, particles, and hybrids. Polymers 14, 3060 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1415306010.3390/polym14153060 ↗
38. M.N.M. Azlin, S.M. Sapuan, M.Y.M. Zuhri, E.S. Zainudin, R.A. Ilyas, Thermal stability, dynamic mechanical analysis and flammability properties of woven kenaf/polyester-reinforced polylactic acid hybrid laminated composites. Polymers 14, 2690 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1413269010.3390/polym14132690 ↗
39. Nandi P, Das D. Mechanical, thermo-mechanical and biodegradation behaviors of green-composites prepared from woven structural nettle (Girardinia diversifolia) reinforcement and poly(lactic acid) fibers. Ind. Crops. Prod. 2022;175:114247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.114247.10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.114247 ↗
40. Ke J, Gao J, Wu Z, Xiang Z, Hu X. Vari-stiffness characteristics of a 3D SMA hybrid basalt woven composite. Compos. Struct. 2022;285:115192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115192.10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115192 ↗
41. Han M-W, Kim M-S, Ahn S-H. Shape memory textile composites with multi-mode actuations for soft morphing skins. Compos. Part B Eng. 2020;198:108170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108170.10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108170 ↗
42. Zubair Z, L’Hostis G, Goda I. Electrical activation and shape recovery control of 3D multilayer woven shape memory polymer composite incorporating carbon fibers. Mater. Lett. 2021;291:129511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2021.129511.10.1016/j.matlet.2021.129511 ↗
43. Sevenois RDB, Van Paepegem W. Fatigue damage modeling techniques for textile composites: review and comparison with unidirectional composite modeling techniques. Appl. Mech. Rev. 2015;67. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4029691.10.1115/1.4029691 ↗
44. J. Hu, W. Chen, P. Fan, J. Gao, G. Fang, Z. Cao, F. Peng, Epoxy shape memory polymer (SMP): material preparation, uniaxial tensile tests and dynamic mechanical analysis. Polym. Test 62, 335–341 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.07.00110.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.07.001 ↗
45. W. Chen, G. Fang, Y. Hu, An experimental and numerical study of flattening and wrapping process of deployable composite thin-walled lenticular tubes. Thin-Walled Struct. 111, 38–47 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2016.11.00910.1016/j.tws.2016.11.009 ↗
46. P. Fan, W. Chen, B. Zhao, J. Hu, J. Gao, G. Fang, F. Peng, Formulation and numerical implementation of tensile shape memory process of shape memory polymers. Polymer 148, 370–381 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2018.06.05410.1016/j.polymer.2018.06.054 ↗
47. Y. Hu, W. Chen, J. Gao, J. Hu, G. Fang, F. Peng, A study of flattening process of deployable composite thin-walled lenticular tubes under compression and tension. Compos. Struct. 168, 164–177 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.02.02910.1016/j.compstruct.2017.02.029 ↗
48. D4255/D4255M-15a A. Standard test method for in-plane shear properties of polymer matrix composite materials by the rail shear method 2015.
49. P. Qu, X. Guan, Y. Jia, S. Lou, J. Nie, Effective elastic properties and stress distribution of 2D biaxial nonorthogonally braided composites. J. Compos Mater. 46, 997–1008 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/002199831141368410.1177/0021998311413684 ↗
50. Z. Xia, Y. Zhang, F. Ellyin, A unified periodical boundary conditions for representative volume elements of composites and applications. Int. J. Solids Struct. 40, 1907–1921 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7683(03)00024-610.1016/S0020-7683(03)00024-6 ↗
51. Qu P, Sun X, Ping L, Zhang D, Jia Y. A new numerical model for the analysis on low-velocity impact damage evolution of carbon fiber reinforced resin composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017;134. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.44374.10.1002/app.44374 ↗
52. P. Qu, X. Sun, X. Guan, Y. Mu, Y. Jia, Effect of interlaminar toughness on the low-velocity impact damage in composite laminates. Polym. Compos. 37, 1085–1092 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2327010.1002/pc.23270 ↗
53. M. Elices, G.V. Guinea, J. Gómez, J. Planas, The cohesive zone model: advantages, limitations and challenges. Eng. Fract Mech. 69, 137–163 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7944(01)00083-210.1016/S0013-7944(01)00083-2 ↗
54. M. Fiolka, A. Matzenmiller, On the resolution of transverse stresses in solid-shells with a multi-layer formulation. Commun. Numer. Methods Eng. 23, 313–326 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.90810.1002/cnm.908 ↗
55. C. Medina, C. Canales, C. Arango, P. Flores, The influence of carbon fabric weave on the in-plane shear mechanical performance of epoxy fiber-reinforced laminates. J. Compos. Mater. 48, 2871–2878 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/002199831350302610.1177/0021998313503026 ↗
56. M. Alizadeh, F. Lohrasby, R. Khajavi, N. Kordani, H.R. Baharvandi, M. Rezanejad, Studying the mechanical properties of composites made of Kenaf-Nylon 66 fabric, silica nanoparticles, and epoxy resin. Polym. Compos. 37, 674–683 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2322410.1002/pc.23224 ↗