Highly Efficient and Spectrally Narrow Near‐Infrared Fluorescent OLEDs Using a TADF‐Sensitized Cyanine Dye
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Through various triplet‐harvesting approaches, fluorescent organic light‐emitting diodes (OLEDs) that emit in the visible spectrum can now be fabricated with efficiencies rivaling those of their phosphorescent counterparts. However, achieving high efficiencies in the near‐infrared (NIR) is considerably more challenging. This is in part due to the low quantum yield of most fluorescent NIR emitters and inefficient triplet exciton harvesting in such devices. Here, fluorescent NIR OLEDs with an external quantum efficiency of 5.4% and a peak emission wavelength of 790 nm are demonstrated. The OLEDs are fabricated by combining a deep‐red host that undergoes thermally assisted delayed fluorescence with a near‐infrared cyanine dye that emits with high efficiency. The devices show nearly pure NIR emission with a NIR cut‐on wavelength of 749 nm and >90% emitted power at wavelengths above 750 nm. It is also shown that the host polarity strongly affects the device performance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research · Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Engineering Physics École Polytechnique de Montréal PO Box 6079, succ. Centre‐Ville Montreal QC H3C 3A7 Canada
Department of Chemistry Université de Montréal 2900 Edouard Montpetit Blvd Montreal QC H3T 1J4 Canada
Funding
Samsung Advanced Institute of Technology · Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada · Canada Research Chairs · Canada Foundation for Innovation
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Qian G. · J. Chem. Phys. · 2009 · 113 · 1589
2. 10.1002/adfm.20170654510.1002/adfm.201706545 ↗
3. 10.1038/nphoton.2016.23010.1038/nphoton.2016.230 ↗
4. Sun Y. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 90 · 1
5. 10.1021/cm202242x10.1021/cm202242x ↗
6. Tanaka H. · Chem. Commun. · 2012 · 48 · 4
7. 10.1002/anie.20150668710.1002/anie.201506687 ↗
8. Yuan Y. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2017 · 27 · 110.1002/adfm.201700986 ↗
9. 10.1002/anie.20160011310.1002/anie.201600113 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41566-017-0087-y10.1038/s41566-017-0087-y ↗
11. 10.7567/APEX.10.07410110.7567/APEX.10.074101 ↗
12. 10.1038/ncomms501610.1038/ncomms5016 ↗
13. 10.1039/c2cp23330d10.1039/c2cp23330d ↗
14. 10.1002/chem.20160474110.1002/chem.201604741 ↗
15. 10.1002/chem.20130423510.1002/chem.201304235 ↗
16. 10.1002/anie.20060476310.1002/anie.200604763 ↗
17. Schubert E. F. · 2006 · 28110.1017/CBO9780511790546 ↗
18. Hu Y. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2018 · 28 · 1
19. 10.1038/ncomms1368010.1038/ncomms13680 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.12532810.1103/PhysRevB.75.125328 ↗
21. 10.1063/1.507964210.1063/1.5079642 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.orgel.2010.03.02310.1016/j.orgel.2010.03.023 ↗
23. Furno M. · Proc. SPIE · 2010 · 7617 · 1
24. 10.1364/JOSAA.15.00096210.1364/JOSAA.15.000962 ↗
25. 10.1364/JOSAB.14.00114910.1364/JOSAB.14.001149 ↗
26. Moon C.‐K. · J. Opt. Soc. Am. B · 2015 · 23 · A279
27. 10.1063/1.503998310.1063/1.5039983 ↗
28. 10.1039/C5SC04685H10.1039/C5SC04685H ↗
29. 10.1021/cm300873310.1021/cm3008733 ↗
30. 10.1002/adom.20160060810.1002/adom.201600608 ↗
31. 10.1002/adfm.20150334410.1002/adfm.201503344 ↗
32. 10.1002/anie.20130848610.1002/anie.201308486 ↗