journal article·2017-06

Highly Efficient Organic Light‐Emitting Diode Using A Low Refractive Index Electron Transport Layer

Amin Salehi, Szuheng Ho, Ying Chen, Cheng Peng, Hartmut Yersin, Franky So

Advanced Optical Materials· Volume 5· Issue 11
Publisher page

Abstract

A low refractive index electron transport layer (ETL) can be very effective in enhancing the out‐coupling efficiency of an organic light‐emitting diode (OLED). However, most organic films show a refractive index close to 1.8. In this work, it has been discovered that tris‐[3‐(3‐pyridyl)mesityl]borane (3TPYMB) has a low refractive index of 1.65 (at 550 nm), which is the lowest refractive index ETL among the commonly used ETLs up to date. Using 3TPYMB as an ETL, a solution processed OLED is demonstrated with nearly a 76% enhancement in external quantum efficiency (EQE). Optical simulation results of this study show that 59% of the enhancement comes from the low refractive index 3TPYMB, and the remaining 17% from the change in charge balance due to the 3TPYMB ETL in the OLED devices.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research · Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Conducting polymers and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics North Carolina State University Raleigh NC 27695 USA

Department of Material Science and Engineering University of Florida Gainesville FL 32611 USA

Department of Material Science and Engineering North Carolina State University Raleigh NC 27695 USA

Institut für Physikalische Chemie Universität Regensburg D‐93040 Regensburg Germany

Funding

CYNORA

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Yeh P. · 2005
2. 10.1002/adfm.20120087610.1002/adfm.201200876 ↗
3. 10.1002/1521-4095(200101)13:2<123::AID-ADMA123>3.0.CO;2-D10.1002/1521-4095(200101)13:2<123::AID-ADMA123>3.0.CO;2-D ↗
4. 10.1080/0950034980823061410.1080/09500349808230614 ↗
5. 10.1364/OE.23.00A27910.1364/OE.23.00A279 ↗
6. 10.1364/OE.23.02112810.1364/OE.23.021128 ↗
7. 10.1002/adma.20150606510.1002/adma.201506065 ↗
8. 10.1088/2053-1613/1/1/01500310.1088/2053-1613/1/1/015003 ↗
9. 10.1002/adma.20130626610.1002/adma.201306266 ↗
10. 10.1039/C6CC06435C10.1039/C6CC06435C ↗
11. 10.1016/j.orgel.2014.03.00910.1016/j.orgel.2014.03.009 ↗
12. 10.1002/adfm.20110190710.1002/adfm.201101907 ↗
13. 10.1039/c2jm31904g10.1039/c2jm31904g ↗
14. 10.1038/srep0212710.1038/srep02127 ↗
15. 10.1088/0256-307X/33/8/08850110.1088/0256-307X/33/8/088501 ↗
16. 10.1038/srep0842910.1038/srep08429 ↗
17. 10.1002/adma.20140589710.1002/adma.201405897 ↗
18. 10.1038/lsa.2013.3010.1038/lsa.2013.30 ↗
19. 10.1117/12.82959810.1117/12.829598 ↗
20. 10.1143/JJAP.46.L11710.1143/JJAP.46.L117 ↗
21. 10.1021/am900228b10.1021/am900228b ↗
22. 10.1246/cl.2007.26210.1246/cl.2007.262 ↗
23. 10.1002/pssa.20143109010.1002/pssa.201431090 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.12570110.1063/1.125701 ↗
25. Leitl M. J. · Top. Curr. Chem. · 2016 · 374 · 110.1007/s41061-015-0002-2 ↗
26. Hill D. · 2008
27. 2016
28. 10.1117/12.82485810.1117/12.824858 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsphotonics.6b0084710.1021/acsphotonics.6b00847 ↗
30. 10.1002/admi.20160032010.1002/admi.201600320 ↗
31. 10.1016/S1566-1199(02)00051-410.1016/S1566-1199(02)00051-4 ↗
32. 10.1039/C5TC01911G10.1039/C5TC01911G ↗