Tailoring Orbital Angular Momentum of Light in the Visible Domain with Metallic Metasurfaces
Source abstract
Abstract
Submicron‐thick gold films endowed with subwavelength patterning allow on‐demand topological shaping of light, hence the precise delivery of optical orbital angular momentum. Several kinds of metallic metasurfaces enabling the generation of optical vortices with arbitrary topological charges in the visible domain are fabricated following a design based on space‐variant subwavelength grating with discrete orientational distribution. The optical performances of obtained flat spin–orbit optical elements designed to operate at 532 nm wavelength are experimentally assessed and satisfactorily compared to expectations. About 80% of optical vortex generation purity for predetermined topological charge up to is achieved. Other designs that allow continuous orientational distribution of nanogratings as well as the superposition of orbital angular momentum states are also proposed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications · Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics · Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Univ. Bordeaux CNRS Laboratoire Ondes et Matière d'Aquitaine UMR 5798 F‐33400 Talence France
Centre for Micro‐Photonics Swinburne University of Technology John st. Hawthorn Vic 3122 Australia
Funding
French State in the frame of the Investments for the future Programme IdEx Bordeaux · COST Action · CONACYT Mexico
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0079-6638(01)80018-410.1016/S0079-6638(01)80018-4 ↗
2. 10.1103/PhysRevA.45.818510.1103/PhysRevA.45.8185 ↗
3. 10.1080/0950034921455115110.1080/09500349214551151 ↗
4. 10.1016/0030-4018(94)90638-610.1016/0030-4018(94)90638-6 ↗
5. 10.1364/OL.17.00022110.1364/OL.17.000221 ↗
6. 10.1016/0030-4018(93)90168-510.1016/0030-4018(93)90168-5 ↗
7. 10.1016/0030-4018(93)90535-D10.1016/0030-4018(93)90535-D ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevA.49.311910.1103/PhysRevA.49.3119 ↗
9. 10.1134/1.155518410.1134/1.1555184 ↗
10. 10.1364/JOSAA.20.00016310.1364/JOSAA.20.000163 ↗
11. 10.1364/OL.27.00187510.1364/OL.27.001875 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.16390510.1103/PhysRevLett.96.163905 ↗
13. 10.1364/OE.15.00552110.1364/OE.15.005521 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.351751910.1063/1.3517519 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.482866210.1063/1.4828662 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.10390310.1103/PhysRevLett.103.103903 ↗
17. 10.1364/OL.36.00071910.1364/OL.36.000719 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.14390110.1103/PhysRevLett.109.143901 ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.08780110.1103/PhysRevLett.108.087801 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.03780210.1103/PhysRevLett.111.037802 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevA.88.06381410.1103/PhysRevA.88.063814 ↗
22. 10.1126/science.122652810.1126/science.1226528 ↗
23. 10.1142/S225123731440013910.1142/S2251237314400139 ↗
24. 10.1038/nmat383910.1038/nmat3839 ↗
25. 10.1088/2040-8978/16/12/12300110.1088/2040-8978/16/12/123001 ↗
26. 10.1088/0034-4885/78/2/02440110.1088/0034-4885/78/2/024401 ↗
27. 10.1515/nanoph-2014-001810.1515/nanoph-2014-0018 ↗
28. 10.1364/OL.34.00122510.1364/OL.34.001225 ↗
29. 10.1364/OL.38.00389010.1364/OL.38.003890 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.476194310.1063/1.4761943 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.489562010.1063/1.4895620 ↗
32. S. A. Schulz J. Upham F. Bouchard I. D. Leon E. Karimi R. W. Boyd 2015 721
33. 10.1038/srep1308910.1038/srep13089 ↗
34. 10.1364/OL.38.00257510.1364/OL.38.002575 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.19390110.1103/PhysRevLett.111.193901 ↗
36. 10.1038/nphys150410.1038/nphys1504 ↗
37. 10.1364/OL.37.00494610.1364/OL.37.004946 ↗
38. 10.1126/science.125321310.1126/science.1253213 ↗
39. 10.1002/adom.20140058410.1002/adom.201400584 ↗
40. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0292610.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02926 ↗
41. 10.1364/OE.23.02261110.1364/OE.23.022611 ↗
42. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0175210.1021/acs.nanolett.5b01752 ↗