Optical Properties of Plasmonic Ultrathin TiN Films
Source abstract
Abstract
Overcoming the challenge of growing ultrathin metallic films is of great importance for practical applications of nanoplasmonic structures. In the present work, epitaxial, ultrathin (<10 nm) films of plasmonic TiN are grown on MgO using DC reactive magnetron sputtering. The optical properties of the films are studied through variable angle spectroscopic ellipsometry and Hall measurements. As the film thickness decreases, they become less metallic and exhibit higher loss while still remaining plasmonic in the optical range. These trends are related to the decreasing carrier concentration in the thinner films and increased scattering, respectively. However, all films tested (2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 nm) still remain highly metallic with a carrier concentration on the order of 1022 cm−3. Based on the relationship between the plasma frequency, carrier concentration, and effective mass, it is determined that the reduction in carrier concentration plays the main role in defining the film's optical properties, as variations in the effective mass are found to be minimal for thicknesses above 4 nm. However, for the 2 nm film and below, theoretical calculations begin to deviate from experimental values.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials · Copper Interconnects and Reliability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Electrical and Computer Engineering and Birck Nanotechnology Center Purdue University West Lafayette IN 47907 USA
School of Electrical and Computer Engineering Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond VA 23220 USA
Funding
National Science Foundation
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.04680310.1103/PhysRevLett.90.046803 ↗
2. 10.1126/science.114804710.1126/science.1148047 ↗
3. 10.1364/OME.5.00239510.1364/OME.5.002395 ↗
4. 10.1038/ncomms1315310.1038/ncomms13153 ↗
5. 10.1038/ncomms454810.1038/ncomms4548 ↗
6. 10.1364/OE.21.01182710.1364/OE.21.011827 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.481977010.1063/1.4819770 ↗
8. 10.1002/adom.20140034510.1002/adom.201400345 ↗
9. 10.1021/cm049605a10.1021/cm049605a ↗
10. Frank B. · 2014 · JTu3A.6010.1364/BGPP.2014.JTu3A.60 ↗
11. 10.1364/OME.2.00047810.1364/OME.2.000478 ↗
12. 10.1073/pnas.131944611110.1073/pnas.1319446111 ↗
13. 10.1002/adma.20120507610.1002/adma.201205076 ↗
14. 10.1021/nl403345710.1021/nl4033457 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0960410.1021/acs.jpcc.5b09604 ↗
16. 10.1364/OE.22.01223810.1364/OE.22.012238 ↗
17. 10.1364/OE.21.02732610.1364/OE.21.027326 ↗
18. Babicheva V. E. · 2014 · 28
19. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0237610.1021/acs.nanolett.6b02376 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.09.07410.1016/j.apsusc.2012.09.074 ↗
21. 10.1143/JJAP.40.266910.1143/JJAP.40.2669 ↗
22. 10.1143/JJAP.42.137510.1143/JJAP.42.1375 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0257-8972(03)00230-510.1016/S0257-8972(03)00230-5 ↗
24. Look D. · 1989
25. 10.1515/nanoph-2015-001710.1515/nanoph-2015-0017 ↗
26. 10.1364/OME.5.00278610.1364/OME.5.002786 ↗
27. 10.1364/OE.16.00118610.1364/OE.16.001186 ↗
28. 10.1116/1.164263910.1116/1.1642639 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.479013610.1063/1.4790136 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.physe.2011.05.01310.1016/j.physe.2011.05.013 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.36565710.1063/1.365657 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.optcom.2007.02.05910.1016/j.optcom.2007.02.059 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.16120210.1103/PhysRevB.83.161202 ↗