journal article·2015-08

Photonic Spin Hall Effect with Nearly 100% Efficiency

Weijie Luo, Shiyi Xiao, Qiong He, Shulin Sun, Lei Zhou

Advanced Optical Materials· Volume 3· Issue 8
Publisher page

Abstract

Photonic spin Hall effect (PSHE; i.e., spin‐polarized photons can be laterally separated in transportation) gains increasing attention from both science and technology, but available mechanisms either require bulky systems or exhibit very low efficiencies. Here it is demonstrated that a giant PSHE with ≈100% efficiency can be realized at certain meta‐surfaces with deep‐subwavelength thicknesses. Based on rigorous Jones matrix analysis, a general criterion to design meta‐surfaces that can realize 100%‐efficiency PSHE is established. The criterion is approachable from two distinct routes at general frequencies. As a demonstration, two microwave meta‐surfaces are fabricated and then experimentally characterized, both showing ≈90% efficiencies for the PSHE. The findings here pave the way for many exciting applications based on high‐efficiency manipulations of photon spins, with a polarization detector experimentally demonstrated here as an example.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Quantum optics and atomic interactions · Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing · Photonic and Optical Devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Surface Physics and Key Laboratory of Micro and Nano Photonic Structures (Ministry of Education) Fudan University Shanghai 200433 China

Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructures Fudan University Shanghai 200433 China

Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Ultra‐Precision Optical Manufacturing Green Photonics and Department of Optical Science and Engineering Fudan University Shanghai 200433 China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation China · MOE of China · Shanghai Science and Technology Committee

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.108712810.1126/science.1087128 ↗
2. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.12660310.1103/PhysRevLett.92.126603 ↗
3. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.183410.1103/PhysRevLett.83.1834 ↗
4. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.39310.1103/PhysRevLett.85.393 ↗
5. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.08390110.1103/PhysRevLett.93.083901 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.07390310.1103/PhysRevLett.96.073903 ↗
7. 10.1126/science.115269710.1126/science.1152697 ↗
8. 10.1126/science.121071310.1126/science.1210713 ↗
9. 10.1038/nmat329210.1038/nmat3292 ↗
10. 10.1021/nl303266810.1021/nl3032668 ↗
11. 10.1021/nl403811d10.1021/nl403811d ↗
12. 10.1126/science.123175810.1126/science.1231758 ↗
13. 10.1021/nl200483510.1021/nl2004835 ↗
14. 10.1038/lsa.2013.2610.1038/lsa.2013.26 ↗
15. 10.1126/science.123374610.1126/science.1233746 ↗
16. 10.1126/science.123489210.1126/science.1234892 ↗
17. 10.1088/2040-8978/16/12/12300110.1088/2040-8978/16/12/123001 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.20390310.1103/PhysRevLett.110.203903 ↗
19. 10.1002/adma.20140504710.1002/adma.201405047 ↗
20. We note that and actually should be interpreted as the spin‐down and spin‐up states in the local frame for the reflected modes since the direction of is reversed here.
21. 10.1007/BF0304605010.1007/BF03046050 ↗
22. 10.1098/rspa.1984.002310.1098/rspa.1984.0023 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.06390810.1103/PhysRevLett.99.063908 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevA.80.02380710.1103/PhysRevA.80.023807 ↗
25. 10.1109/22.79800110.1109/22.798001 ↗
26. 10.1007/s00339-006-3825-410.1007/s00339-006-3825-4 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.10740410.1103/PhysRevLett.90.107404 ↗
28. 10.1364/OL.32.00085610.1364/OL.32.000856 ↗
29. 10.1088/0022-3727/47/42/42510310.1088/0022-3727/47/42/425103 ↗
30. 10.1126/science.125321310.1126/science.1253213 ↗
31. 10.1038/ncomms638610.1038/ncomms6386 ↗
32. 10.1364/OL.38.00051310.1364/OL.38.000513 ↗
33. 10.1038/srep0215510.1038/srep02155 ↗
34. 10.1038/lsa.2014.7810.1038/lsa.2014.78 ↗