Benchmarking Coaxial and Angular Optical Emission Spectroscopy With Recommendations for Reliable Compositional In Situ Monitoring During Laser Powder Bed Fusion
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT Real‐time insight into local chemistry is critical for reliable part quality in additive manufacturing, especially laser powder bed fusion (PBF‑LB/M), where rapid thermal cycles and localized evaporation can undermine part performance. Optical emission spectroscopy (OES) offers non‑intrusive, in situ plume monitoring, but detection geometry strongly affects precision. We address this through geometry‐ and physics‐based approaches and spectral measurements with angular (off‐axis) and coaxial (on‐axis) configurations, exploring how detection configurations influence signal stability, spatial consistency, and chemical precision, by varying laser power, integration time, scan position, and pattern on an Nd‐Fe‐based hard magnet alloy. By quantifying wavelength‐dependent efficiency and plume anisotropy, we establish a decision framework to choose the most suitable in situ OES setup for applications ranging from defect detection to reliable high‐precision chemical mapping. Coaxial OES offers superior detection sensitivity for low‐ionization‐energy elements like Nd, due to the forward‐peaked emission profile and high detection efficiency, enabling quantitative detection below ±0.2 at.% under optimized conditions. Angular OES is easier to integrate and reveals lateral plume structure and processing defects, but yields two‐fold lower compositional accuracy under identical conditions. These findings provide a foundation for selecting OES geometries in PBF‐LB/M and represent a clear step toward robust, material‐sensitive closed‐loop monitoring in industrial PBF‐LB/M.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Technical Chemistry I and Center for Nanointegration Duisburg‐Essen (CENIDE) University of Duisburg‐Essen Essen Germany
Aconity GmbH Herzogenrath Germany
Chair of Manufacturing Technology University of Duisburg‐Essen Duisburg Germany
Funding
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
References (68)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1179/1743280411Y.000000001410.1179/1743280411Y.0000000014 ↗
2. 10.1063/1.493780910.1063/1.4937809 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2022.12298510.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2022.122985 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.09.03510.1016/j.addma.2018.09.035 ↗
5. 10.1080/14686996.2021.191637710.1080/14686996.2021.1916377 ↗
6. 10.1002/advs.20240797210.1002/advs.202407972 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.eng.2018.11.03410.1016/j.eng.2018.11.034 ↗
8. 10.1088/1361‐6501/aa5c4f10.1088/1361‐6501/aa5c4f ↗
9. S.Kleszczynski J.Zur Jacobsmühlen J. T.Sehrt andG.Witt “Error Detection in Laser Beam Melting Systems by High Resolution Imaging ”Proc. 23rd Annu. Int. Solid Free. Fabr. Symp (2012):975–987 https://doi.org/10.26153/tsw/15404.
10. Union der deutschen Akademien der Wissenschaften Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften Leopoldina acatech “Additive Fertigung: Entwicklungen Möglichkeiten und Herausforderungen” Deutsche Akademie der Technikwissenschaften (2020) ISBN 978‐3‐8047‐3636‐8.
11. 10.1007/s00170‐022‐10169‐410.1007/s00170‐022‐10169‐4 ↗
12. 10.1088/1757‐899X/1332/1/01203310.1088/1757‐899X/1332/1/012033 ↗
13. Ren Y. · 2023
14. A.Elspaß J.Wegner H.Schonrath N.Horstjann andS.Kleszczynski “High‐precision Measurement of Melt Pool Properties During Laser‐based Powder Bed Fusion of Metals by High‐speed Imaging ” Proc. 34thAnnu. Int. Solid Free. Fabr. Symp. (2023): 1116–1135 https://doi.org/10.26153/tsw/51016.
15. 10.1007/s40828‐020‐00114‐x10.1007/s40828‐020‐00114‐x ↗
16. 10.1088/1757‐899X/1309/1/01200110.1088/1757‐899X/1309/1/012001 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.sab.2017.11.01210.1016/j.sab.2017.11.012 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.sab.2017.05.00610.1016/j.sab.2017.05.006 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.sab.2022.10647410.1016/j.sab.2022.106474 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.03.02010.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.03.020 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.09.05110.1016/j.actamat.2017.09.051 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.05.03210.1016/j.addma.2018.05.032 ↗
23. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.651.81210.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.651.812 ↗
24. A. J.Dunbar A. R.Nassar E. W.Reutzel andJ. J.Blecher “A Real‐Time Communication Architecture for Metal Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing ” Proc. 27th Annu. Int. Solid Free. Fabr. Symp. (2016): 67–80 https://hdl.handle.net/2152/89540.
25. A. R.Nassar T. J.Spurgeon andE. W.Reutzel “Sensing Defects During Directed‐Energy Additive Manufacturing of Metal Parts Using Optical Emissions Spectroscopy ” Proc. 25th Annu. Int. Solid Free. Fabr. Symp. (2014): 278–287 https://doi.org/10.26153/tsw/15684.
26. 10.1080/17452759.2017.139268310.1080/17452759.2017.1392683 ↗
27. 10.1080/24725854.2019.165952510.1080/24725854.2019.1659525 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.procir.2024.08.12010.1016/j.procir.2024.08.120 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.matdes.2024.11321110.1016/j.matdes.2024.113211 ↗
30. C.Lough L.Escano M.Qu et al. “In‐Situ Optical Emission Spectroscopy during SLM of 304L Stainless Steel ”Proc. 29th Annu. Int. Solid Free. Fabr. Symp. 2018 Austin(TX 2018):2192–2201.https://doi.org/10.26153/tsw/17213.
31. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.02.01610.1016/j.jmapro.2020.02.016 ↗
32. 10.1007/s40964‐025‐01184‐410.1007/s40964‐025‐01184‐4 ↗
33. 10.3390/s1912283310.3390/s19122833 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.10.03710.1016/j.matdes.2016.10.037 ↗
35. 10.3390/ma1303053810.3390/ma13030538 ↗
36. 10.1038/s41598‐020‐67249‐210.1038/s41598‐020‐67249‐2 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.sab.2008.05.01010.1016/j.sab.2008.05.010 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.sab.2024.10689910.1016/j.sab.2024.106899 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.sab.2007.11.03410.1016/j.sab.2007.11.034 ↗
40. National Institute of Standards and Technology Basic Atomic Spectroscopic Data Handbook NIST(2009) https://www.nist.gov/pml/basic‐atomic‐spectroscopic‐data‐handbook(accessed November 2024).
41. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) “NIST Standard Reference Database 78 Atomic Spectra Database” Version 5.12 (2024) https://dx.doi.org/10.18434/T4W30F.
42. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) “Persistent Lines of Neutral Iron (Fe I)” in Basic Atomic Spectroscopic Data (2024) https://www.physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/Handbook/Tables/irontable3.htm.
43. 10.1088/0034‐4885/29/1/30210.1088/0034‐4885/29/1/302 ↗
44. 10.1016/S0584‐8547(01)00398‐610.1016/S0584‐8547(01)00398‐6 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.sab.2007.03.02410.1016/j.sab.2007.03.024 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.addma.2026.10511210.1016/j.addma.2026.105112 ↗
47. 10.1007/s40964‐020‐00117‐710.1007/s40964‐020‐00117‐7 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.10999210.1016/j.matdes.2021.109992 ↗
49. 10.1021/ed049p40510.1021/ed049p405 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.sab.2020.10587810.1016/j.sab.2020.105878 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.01.04410.1016/j.jmapro.2022.01.044 ↗
52. 10.1016/S0584‐8547(02)00053‐810.1016/S0584‐8547(02)00053‐8 ↗
53. Cremers D. · 201310.1002/9781118567371 ↗
54. 10.1366/000370299194550610.1366/0003702991945506 ↗
55. 10.1007/s00170‐021‐06810‐310.1007/s00170‐021‐06810‐3 ↗
56. Norrish J. · 200610.1533/9781845691707 ↗
57. 10.1209/epl/i1997‐00485‐910.1209/epl/i1997‐00485‐9 ↗
58. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.399810.1103/PhysRevLett.84.3998 ↗
59. 10.1007/s00340‐013‐5435‐010.1007/s00340‐013‐5435‐0 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.09.01110.1016/j.jmapro.2018.09.011 ↗
61. 10.1007/s11837‐020‐04020‐y10.1007/s11837‐020‐04020‐y ↗
62. Some Descriptive Chemistry of the Metals, the Lanthanide and Actinide Elements
63. 10.1088/0031‐9155/52/13/00710.1088/0031‐9155/52/13/007 ↗
64. 10.1002/qute.20200010210.1002/qute.202000102 ↗
65. 10.1366/11‐0657410.1366/11‐06574 ↗
66. 10.1109/JSTQE.2025.359299210.1109/JSTQE.2025.3592992 ↗
67. 10.1039/b400355c10.1039/b400355c ↗
68. P. A.Basore “Extended Spectral Analysis of Internal Quantum Efficiency ” inInConference Record of the 23rd IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference‐1993 (Cat. No. 93CH3283‐9)(IEEE 1993) 147–152 https://doi.org/10.1109/PVSC.1993.347063.10.1109/PVSC.1993.347063 ↗