journal article·2026-07Open access

Fully 3D‐Printed Wave‐Wound Electromagnetic Motors

Joseph Schwalbe, Sebastian Mettes, Eduardo Francke, Kenneth W. Allen, Yi Chen Mazumdar

Advanced Materials Technologies· Volume 11· Issue 14

Abstract

ABSTRACT Additive manufacturing has become an enabling technology, but existing techniques are not capable of directly 3D printing high current electromagnetic actuators due to material and design limitations. In this work, a novel 3D‐printable, multi‐layer, wave‐winding topology is created for high efficiency electric motors. This is achieved through the development of a new additive manufacturing technique that incorporates conductive silver nanoparticle inks, thermally conductive but electrically insulating polymers, and surface mount electrical components. Excluding the permanent magnets, this work is the first to demonstrate the use of 3D printing for manufacturing all of the motor elements. This includes the stator, housings, bearings, and sensing circuits for an axial flux motor, cylindrical radial flux motor, and a linear motor. Results show that the axial flux motor can reach a peak stall torque of 7.62 and a maximum efficiency of 28.2%, which is 5 higher torque and 3.7 higher efficiency than any prior work. Using these unique 3D printed actuators, realistic applications are demonstrated including a fan, water pump, paddle‐wheel boat, multi‐legged walking robot, and waving arm. With the material and design innovations discussed in this work, the creation of fully 3D‐printed electromechanical devices, machines, and robots become possible.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Piezoelectric Actuators and Control · Soft Robotics and Applications · Advanced Materials and Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta USA

Georgia Tech Research Institute Atlanta USA

Funding

Research Institute, Georgia Institute of Technology

References (58)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/D2NR06771D10.1039/D2NR06771D ↗
2. 10.1016/j.addma.2017.10.00210.1016/j.addma.2017.10.002 ↗
3. 10.1007/s11664-022-09579-710.1007/s11664-022-09579-7 ↗
4. 10.1002/admt.20220049210.1002/admt.202200492 ↗
5. 10.1002/adfm.20220803410.1002/adfm.202208034 ↗
6. 10.1109/JMW.2023.325034310.1109/JMW.2023.3250343 ↗
7. A.Gharibi M.Tavakoli A. F.Silva F.Costa andS.Genovesi “3D Printed Radiofrequency Sensing System for Robotic Applications ” inProceedings of the 2023 IEEE 13th International Conference on RFID Technology and Applications (RFID‐TA)(2023):177–180.10.1109/RFID-TA58140.2023.10290398 ↗
8. 10.1021/acsaelm.2c0137410.1021/acsaelm.2c01374 ↗
9. 10.1109/TMTT.2025.357746710.1109/TMTT.2025.3577467 ↗
10. 10.1007/s12541-021-00508-y10.1007/s12541-021-00508-y ↗
11. 10.1109/TMECH.2023.327623610.1109/TMECH.2023.3276236 ↗
12. A.ElaskriandA.Ellery “3D Printed Electric Motors as a Step Towards Self‐Replicating Machines ” inProceedings of the International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence Robotics and Automation in Space(2020).
13. 10.1002/adfm.20251970210.1002/adfm.202519702 ↗
14. 10.1002/admt.20200007010.1002/admt.202000070 ↗
15. 10.1002/admt.20240098210.1002/admt.202400982 ↗
16. 10.1089/soro.2022.007510.1089/soro.2022.0075 ↗
17. 10.1109/LRA.2021.310568710.1109/LRA.2021.3105687 ↗
18. 10.1115/1.405004110.1115/1.4050041 ↗
19. N.Kohls B.Dias Y.Mensah B. P.Ruddy andY. C.Mazumdar “Compliant Electromagnetic Actuator Architecture for Soft Robotics ” inProceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)(2020):9042–9049.10.1109/ICRA40945.2020.9197442 ↗
20. 10.1002/adfm.20241581910.1002/adfm.202415819 ↗
21. 10.1002/admt.20230204810.1002/admt.202302048 ↗
22. 10.1002/adfm.20221495410.1002/adfm.202214954 ↗
23. 10.1002/adfm.20231119310.1002/adfm.202311193 ↗
24. 10.1002/adma.20210885510.1002/adma.202108855 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2022.10094510.1016/j.pmatsci.2022.100945 ↗
26. 10.1002/aelm.20180083110.1002/aelm.201800831 ↗
27. 10.1109/TEC.2020.296494210.1109/TEC.2020.2964942 ↗
28. 10.3390/machines1005033010.3390/machines10050330 ↗
29. 10.1109/TEC.2022.321389610.1109/TEC.2022.3213896 ↗
30. 10.1049/iet-epa.2020.014110.1049/iet-epa.2020.0141 ↗
31. 10.1109/TIE.2017.271686510.1109/TIE.2017.2716865 ↗
32. H.Stakhiv O.Solomchak M.Stepien andP.Lasek “Analysis and Experimental Investigation of 3D Printed Electric Motor With Permanent Magnets ” inProceedings of the 2020 XI International Conference on Electrical Power Drive Systems (ICEPDS)(2020):1–5.10.1109/ICEPDS47235.2020.9249306 ↗
33. 10.3390/act1410048110.3390/act14100481 ↗
34. E.Aguilera J.Ramos D.Espalin et al. “3D Printing of Electro Mechanical Systems ” inProceedings of the 2013 International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium(2013).
35. 10.1002/admt.20190012610.1002/admt.201900126 ↗
36. 10.1109/TMECH.2024.340081110.1109/TMECH.2024.3400811 ↗
37. 10.1115/1.406995110.1115/1.4069951 ↗
38. S.Mettes J.Bates K. W.Allen andY. C.Mazumdar “A Fully 3D Printed Multi‐Material and High Operating Temperature Electromagnetic Actuator ” inProceedings of the 2023 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM)(2023):517–524.10.1109/AIM46323.2023.10196155 ↗
39. S.Mettes N.Kohls K. W.Allen andY. C.Mazumdar “Characterization of a 3D Printed Electric Solenoid With Multi‐Layer Silver Nanoparticle Traces ” inProceedings of the 2022 American Automatic Control Council Modeling Estimation and Control Conference55 no.37(2022):139–144.10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.11.174 ↗
40. K. P.Duffy “Optimizing Power Density and Efficiency of a Double‐Halbach Permanent‐Magnet Ironless Axial Flux Motor ” inProceedings of the 52nd AIAA/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference(2016): 4712.10.2514/6.2016-4712 ↗
41. 10.1109/TIA.2012.222685410.1109/TIA.2012.2226854 ↗
42. S.Lomheim “Analysis of a Novel Coil Design for Axial Flux Machines ”Master's thesis Norwegian University of Science and Technology Trondheim Norway 2013.
43. G.Rezazadeh S.Vaschetto F.Tahami G.Capolino H.Henao andZ.Nasiri‐Gheidari “Analysis of Six‐Phase Induction Motor With Distributed and Concentrated Windings by Using the Winding Function Method ” inProceedings of the 2018 XIII International Conference on Electrical Machines (ICEM)(2018):2423–2429.10.1109/ICELMACH.2018.8507049 ↗
44. 10.1016/S0378-7796(03)00069-510.1016/S0378-7796(03)00069-5 ↗
45. 10.1109/TIA.2018.287215510.1109/TIA.2018.2872155 ↗
46. 10.1088/0143-0807/37/2/02520310.1088/0143-0807/37/2/025203 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2018.02.00310.1016/j.jmmm.2018.02.003 ↗
48. A.HembelandB.Sarlioglu “High Current Density Winding Design With 3D Printed In‐Slot Heat Exchanger for Electric Machines ” inProceedings of the 2023 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE)(2023):3959–3964.10.1109/ECCE53617.2023.10362299 ↗
49. 10.1007/s10439-012-0580-x10.1007/s10439-012-0580-x ↗
50. K. C.Thin M. M.Khaing andK. M.Aye “Design and Performance Analysis of Centrifugal Pump ” inProceedings of the World Academy of Science Engineering and Technology46 no.1(2008):422–429.
51. Analysis of Radial‐Flow Impellers of Different Configurations
52. Analysis of Theo Jansen Mechanism (Strandbeest) and Its Comparative Advantages Over Wheel Based Mine Excavation System
53. 3D‐Printable All‐Terrain Biomimetic Platform
54. 10.1103/PhysRevE.109.04470510.1103/PhysRevE.109.044705 ↗
55. 10.1002/adfm.20190554510.1002/adfm.201905545 ↗
56. 10.1002/admt.20180045510.1002/admt.201800455 ↗
57. 10.1002/admt.20210003910.1002/admt.202100039 ↗
58. 10.1002/admt.20220134910.1002/admt.202201349 ↗