journal article·2026-06Open access

Optofluidic Raman Analysis and Capacity Recovery in Li‐ion Cells

Ermanno Miele, Wesley M. Dose, Ian A. K. Davidson, Hesham Sakr, Natalie V. Wheeler, Francesco Poletti, Michael De Volder, Clare P. Grey, Jeremy J. Baumberg, Tijmen G. Euser

Advanced Materials Technologies· Volume 11· Issue 12

Abstract

ABSTRACT Battery performance degradation arises from multifactorial and complex electrochemical processes involving all the battery components. Therefore, identifying and mitigating/suppressing the main degradation mechanisms is essential for deploying these technologies. Such a holistic understanding requires advanced and dedicated analytical tools as well as effective strategies to recover battery capacity, extend battery life, and facilitate second‐life use and recycling of devices. Here, we develop a set of optical and microfluidic methodologies that enable operando chemical analysis of liquid electrolytes using Raman spectroscopy. We demonstrate that our methods have minimal perturbation on device operation and can be readily embedded in standard manufacturing processes. A bi‐directional microfluidic access port allows the extraction and reinjection of carbonate‐based electrolytes for analysis over hundreds of electrochemical cycles. Our data show that lithium salt anion (PF 6 − ) degradation is a major source of electrolyte degradation and capacity loss in industrially relevant Li‐ion pouch cells (Ni‐rich layered cathodes (NMC811), and graphite anodes). The effects are particularly strong when cycled to an upper‐cut voltage of 4.3 V. Finally, we demonstrate that battery capacity loss can be partially reversed by re‐infusing pristine, uncycled electrolyte via an integrated microfluidic access port. This strategy not only mitigates degradation and extends battery life but also offers a practical pathway toward second‐life applications and adaptable cell chemistries for future battery technologies.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Technologies Research · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics Nanophotonics Centre Cavendish Laboratory University of Cambridge Cambridge UK

Yusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry University of Cambridge Cambridge UK

The Faraday Institution Quad One Harwell Science and Innovation Campus Oxford UK

KnowLitech Ltd., Shaoxing Zhejiang China

School of Chemistry The University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia

Department of Engineering Institute for Manufacturing University of Cambridge Cambridge UK

Optoelectronics Research Centre University of Southampton Southampton UK

Funding

Faraday Institution · Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nmat477710.1038/nmat4777 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41893‐022‐00859‐y10.1038/s41893‐022‐00859‐y ↗
3. Kandhasamy M. · 2024 · 1
4. 10.3390/en1524954110.3390/en15249541 ↗
5. 10.3390/en801017210.3390/en8010172 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41467‐024‐48554‐010.1038/s41467‐024‐48554‐0 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.22210.1016/j.energy.2018.06.222 ↗
8. 10.1038/s41467‐020‐19991‐410.1038/s41467‐020‐19991‐4 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.23280510.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.232805 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41586‐024‐08465‐y10.1038/s41586‐024‐08465‐y ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.11.10310.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.11.103 ↗
12. 10.1039/C6TA06437J10.1039/C6TA06437J ↗
13. 10.1038/s41560‐021‐00792‐y10.1038/s41560‐021‐00792‐y ↗
14. 10.1002/adma.20220321810.1002/adma.202203218 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsami.1c2281210.1021/acsami.1c22812 ↗
16. 10.1038/s43246‐020‐00095‐x10.1038/s43246‐020‐00095‐x ↗
17. 10.1038/s41467‐020‐15355‐010.1038/s41467‐020‐15355‐0 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41467‐023‐36647‐110.1038/s41467‐023‐36647‐1 ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b1167710.1021/acs.jpcc.9b11677 ↗
20. 10.1038/s41563‐020‐0767‐810.1038/s41563‐020‐0767‐8 ↗
21. 10.1038/s41586‐022‐04689‐y10.1038/s41586‐022‐04689‐y ↗
22. 10.1016/j.xcrp.2020.10025310.1016/j.xcrp.2020.100253 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c0172210.1021/acsenergylett.2c01722 ↗
24. 10.1002/ange.20220213310.1002/ange.202202133 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsami.5b0642610.1021/acsami.5b06426 ↗
26. 10.1149/2.1111702jes10.1149/2.1111702jes ↗
27. 10.1149/1945‐7111/ac035910.1149/1945‐7111/ac0359 ↗
28. 10.1002/aenm.20220330710.1002/aenm.202203307 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.08.01810.1016/j.joule.2019.08.018 ↗
30. 10.1038/s41560‐022‐01141‐310.1038/s41560‐022‐01141‐3 ↗
31. 10.1038/s41467‐022‐29330‐410.1038/s41467‐022‐29330‐4 ↗
32. 10.1021/acsphotonics.4c0052510.1021/acsphotonics.4c00525 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ensm.2024.10379410.1016/j.ensm.2024.103794 ↗
34. 10.1038/d41586‐021‐02222‐110.1038/d41586‐021‐02222‐1 ↗
35. 10.1038/s41467‐024‐52030‐010.1038/s41467‐024‐52030‐0 ↗
36. 10.1038/s41467‐020‐19910‐710.1038/s41467‐020‐19910‐7 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.joule.2022.09.00810.1016/j.joule.2022.09.008 ↗
38. 10.1039/D2YA00211F10.1039/D2YA00211F ↗
39. 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c0159610.1021/acsenergylett.3c01596 ↗
40. 10.1038/s41524‐018‐0064‐010.1038/s41524‐018‐0064‐0 ↗
41. 10.1039/C9EE02543J10.1039/C9EE02543J ↗
42. 10.1021/jacs.0c0636310.1021/jacs.0c06363 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.est.2023.10887510.1016/j.est.2023.108875 ↗
44. 10.1039/D3LF00093A10.1039/D3LF00093A ↗
45. 10.1021/jp510071d10.1021/jp510071d ↗
46. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0784810.1021/acs.jpcc.8b07848 ↗
47. 10.1021/acsaem.2c0204710.1021/acsaem.2c02047 ↗
48. 10.1149/1945-7111/ac6d1310.1149/1945-7111/ac6d13 ↗
49. T. D.Bradley G. T.Jasion J. R.Hayes et al. “Record low‐loss 1.3 dB/km Data Transmitting Antiresonant Hollow Core Fibre ”2018 European Conference on Optical Communicationn/a(2019):1–3 https://doi.org/10.1109/ECOC.2018.8535324.10.1109/ECOC.2018.8535324 ↗
50. 10.1364/OL.27.00159210.1364/OL.27.001592 ↗