Microstructured Electrode‐Piezopolymer Interface for Ultrasound Transducers With Enhanced Flexibility and Acoustic Performance
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT Ultrasound transducers made from rigid piezoceramics are difficult to adapt for wearable or conformal applications. Piezopolymer‐based transducers offer a practical alternative; however, most existing studies focus on piezoelectric materials, while the influence of electrode material and electrode–polymer interface remains underexplored. This study leverages different interface‐engineering strategies to examine the influence of electrode–piezopolymer interface morphology on piezoelectric, dielectric, and acoustic behavior in flexible transducers. Devices were fabricated using silver (Ag), gold (Au), graphene flakes (GF), laser‐induced graphene (LIG), and Au‐decorated LIG electrodes, enabling comparison across interfacial architectures. LIG‐based transducers showed strong acoustic and piezoelectric output due to partial infiltration of the piezopolymer into the porous LIG network, which enhances interfacial contact and stress transfer. Au‐based transducers achieved comparable acoustic output. In contrast, dense Ag electrodes and layered GF films provided limited coupling, resulting in reduced electromechanical response. LIG‐based transducers exhibited the highest flexibility and durability, retaining stable performance after 10,000 bending cycles and an eight‐week aging study, whereas GF, Ag, and Au devices degraded under bending, and Ag electrodes declined over time. These findings demonstrate that engineering the electrode–polymer interface is critical for high‐performance flexible ultrasound transducers and identify LIG as a strong candidate for wearable imaging applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications · Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Bioengineering George Mason University Fairfax Virginia USA
Funding
Medical Technology Enterprise Consortium
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41377‐024‐01480‐810.1038/s41377‐024‐01480‐8 ↗
2. 10.1098/rsif.2011.005410.1098/rsif.2011.0054 ↗
3. 10.1126/sciadv.aar397910.1126/sciadv.aar3979 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ultras.2006.05.12210.1016/j.ultras.2006.05.122 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.07.02610.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.07.026 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41598‐022‐20721‐710.1038/s41598‐022‐20721‐7 ↗
7. 10.1126/sciadv.abi928310.1126/sciadv.abi9283 ↗
8. 10.1109/JSEN.2021.313587210.1109/JSEN.2021.3135872 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.sna.2020.11247610.1016/j.sna.2020.112476 ↗
10. I.AlMohimeed M.Agarwal andY.Onopresented at2018 IEEE Canadian Conference on Electrical & Computer Engineering (CCECE)(2018):1–4.10.1109/CCECE.2018.8447859 ↗
11. 10.1002/admt.20210079810.1002/admt.202100798 ↗
12. 10.1002/admt.20230057710.1002/admt.202300577 ↗
13. 10.1002/admt.20220131610.1002/admt.202201316 ↗
14. 10.1109/TUFFC.2023.333331810.1109/TUFFC.2023.3333318 ↗
15. 10.3390/bios1509056110.3390/bios15090561 ↗
16. 10.3390/mi1112107610.3390/mi11121076 ↗
17. 10.1002/pat.591410.1002/pat.5914 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41467‐024‐47074‐110.1038/s41467‐024‐47074‐1 ↗
19. 10.3390/mi1401012610.3390/mi14010126 ↗
20. S.Kim X.Zhang R.Daugherty et al. presented at2012 IEEE 25th International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS)(2012):1193–1196 https://doi.org/10.1109/MEMSYS.2012.6170377.10.1109/MEMSYS.2012.6170377 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.cej.2023.14632210.1016/j.cej.2023.146322 ↗
22. 10.3390/mi611145310.3390/mi6111453 ↗
23. Q.Zhu L.Zhang H.Liu et al. " presented at2018 IEEE 13th Annual International Conference on Nano/Micro Engineered and Molecular Systems (NEMS)(2018):345–348 https://doi.org/10.1109/NEMS.2018.8556929.10.1109/NEMS.2018.8556929 ↗
24. 10.3390/s2221810010.3390/s22218100 ↗
25. 10.1109/TUFFC.2006.166510510.1109/TUFFC.2006.1665105 ↗
26. 10.1109/TIE.2019.293706310.1109/TIE.2019.2937063 ↗
27. C.Peng M.Chen H. K.Sim Y.Zhu andX.Jiang "2020 IEEE 15th International Conference on Nano/Micro Engineered and Molecular System (NEMS)(2020):143–146 https://doi.org/10.1109/NEMS50311.2020.9265560.10.1109/NEMS50311.2020.9265560 ↗
28. 10.1080/19475411.2023.226177510.1080/19475411.2023.2261775 ↗
29. 10.1007/s10853‐015‐9643‐310.1007/s10853‐015‐9643‐3 ↗
30. 10.1007/s40820‐025‐01890‐210.1007/s40820‐025‐01890‐2 ↗
31. J.Lv G.Thangavel andP.See Lee Reliability of printed stretchable electronics based on nano/micro materials for practical applications(2023).10.1039/D2NR04464A ↗
32. J.Chen J.Liu W.Chen et al. “Skin‐Conformable Flexible and Stretchable Ultrasound Transducer for Wearable Imaging ”IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control71(2024):811–820.10.1109/TUFFC.2024.3352655 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsanm.3c0292510.1021/acsanm.3c02925 ↗
34. 10.1002/adma.20120148210.1002/adma.201201482 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.carbon.2024.11954710.1016/j.carbon.2024.119547 ↗
36. 10.1038/ncomms671410.1038/ncomms6714 ↗
37. 10.1002/adfm.20220515810.1002/adfm.202205158 ↗
38. 10.1021/acssensors.4c0171710.1021/acssensors.4c01717 ↗
39. 10.1039/D3TC04677J10.1039/D3TC04677J ↗
40. 10.1016/j.matdes.2023.11201910.1016/j.matdes.2023.112019 ↗
41. 10.1021/acsanm.4c0377210.1021/acsanm.4c03772 ↗
42. 10.1002/advs.20241460710.1002/advs.202414607 ↗
43. 10.1021/acsami.1c1192210.1021/acsami.1c11922 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.matdes.2025.11520510.1016/j.matdes.2025.115205 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.polymer.2022.12469110.1016/j.polymer.2022.124691 ↗
46. K. T. T.PhamandN. L.Nguyenpresented at 2017 International Conference on Advanced Technologies for Communications (ATC)(2017):204–209 https://doi.org/10.1109/ATC.2017.8167617.10.1109/ATC.2017.8167617 ↗
47. Kajfez D. · 2005
48. 10.3390/healthcare1101012310.3390/healthcare11010123 ↗
49. 10.1117/1.JBO.17.11.11601610.1117/1.JBO.17.11.116016 ↗
50. 10.1039/D4TC00707G10.1039/D4TC00707G ↗
51. 10.1039/D2SD00176D10.1039/D2SD00176D ↗