Toughening Ceramic Joints through Strategic Fracture Path Control
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Ceramic‐on‐ceramic joints are notorious for their inherent brittleness, posing challenges for high‐performance applications. To address this, a novel approach is proposed to enhance the involvement of filler metals during fracture. This study investigates the controlled initiation and propagation of cracks in Al2O3–Al2O3 joints through a strategic combination of laser pre‐cracking, laser patterning, and laser active brazing techniques. By introducing pre‐cracking and African daisy‐like patterning, crack propagation dynamics are altered, with cracks initially confined within pre‐crack regions before navigating through pattern intrusions. Additionally, laser active brazing effectively managed titanium diffusion, optimizing interface strength control. Evaluation via SEVNB tests demonstrated a significant enhancement in fracture toughness, achieving maximal 25.6 ± 4.6 MPa·m0.5 compared to ≈3–5 MPa·m0.5 for alumina ribbons. This integrated approach offers precise control over fracture paths, thereby augmenting the performance of ceramic‐on‐ceramic joints, and holds promise for advancing their applications in demanding environments.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Advanced materials and composites · Rock Mechanics and Modeling
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Dresden University of Technology (TUD) Chair of Hydrogen Technology and Nuclear Power Engineering George‐Bähr‐Str. 3 D‐01062 Dresden Germany
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.2355/isijinternational.30.101110.2355/isijinternational.30.1011 ↗
2. 10.1179/174328009X46107810.1179/174328009X461078 ↗
3. 10.1002/adma.20080332210.1002/adma.200803322 ↗
4. 10.3390/jeta201000110.3390/jeta2010001 ↗
5. 10.1007/s11665-024-09285-x10.1007/s11665-024-09285-x ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2014.04.02610.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2014.04.026 ↗
7. 10.1002/adem.20070034710.1002/adem.200700347 ↗
8. Feng J. · 2024
9. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00052.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00052.x ↗
10. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1982.tb10783.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1982.tb10783.x ↗
11. c)J.Kübler inProceedings of the 21st Annual Conference on Composites Advanced Ceramics Materials and Structures—B: Ceramic Engineering and Science Proceedings 1997 pp155–162;
12. 10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00206-X10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00206-X ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2008.12.00310.1016/j.ijrmhm.2008.12.003 ↗
14. 10.1016/S1359-6454(96)00126-710.1016/S1359-6454(96)00126-7 ↗
15. 10.1007/s11666-019-00956-z10.1007/s11666-019-00956-z ↗
16. a)T.Fett Stress intensity factors‐T‐stresses‐weight functions Universitätsverlag Karlsruhe Karlsruhe Germany2008;
17. 10.1016/0022-5096(86)90039-610.1016/0022-5096(86)90039-6 ↗
18. 10.1115/1.80153510.1115/1.801535 ↗
19. Hsueh C. H. · J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1988 · 71 · C234
20. J.Feng M.Herrmann A.‐M.Reinecke A.Hurtado presented at17th European Congress and Exhibition on Advanced Materials and Processes (FEMS EUROMAT DGM Frankfurt) 2023.