journal article·2021-06Open access

Remote Sensing and Remote Actuation via Silicone–Magnetic Nanorod Composites

Bryce J. Stottlemire, Jonathan D. Miller, Jonathan Whitlow, Sebastian G. Huayamares, Prajnaparamita Dhar, Mei He, Cory J. Berkland

Advanced Materials Technologies· Volume 6· Issue 6

Abstract

Abstract The capacity for a soft material to combine remote sensing and remote actuation is highly desirable for many applications in soft robotics and wearable technologies. This work presents a silicone elastomer with a suspension of a small weight fraction of ferromagnetic nickel nanorods, which is capable of both sensing deformation and altering stiffness in the presence of an external magnetic field. Cylinders composed of silicone elastomer and 1% by weight nickel nanorods experience large increases in compressive modulus when exposed to an external magnetic field. Incremental compressions totaling 600 g of force applied to the same silicone–nanorod composites increase the magnetic field strength measured by a Hall effect sensor enabling the material to be used as a soft load cell capable of detecting the rate, duration, and magnitude of force applied. In addition, lattice structures are 3D printed using an ink composed of silicone elastomer and 1% by weight nickel nanorods, which possess the same sensing capacity.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Advanced Materials and Mechanics · Dielectric materials and actuators

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering University of Kansas 1530 West 15th Street Lawrence KS 66045 USA

Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry University of Kansas 2095 Constant Avenue Lawrence KS 66047 USA

References (17)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.03.00210.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.03.002 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41586-018-0185-010.1038/s41586-018-0185-0 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41467-018-06491-910.1038/s41467-018-06491-9 ↗
4. 10.1126/scirobotics.aav449410.1126/scirobotics.aav4494 ↗
5. 10.1126/sciadv.aau641910.1126/sciadv.aau6419 ↗
6. 10.1002/aisy.20190002510.1002/aisy.201900025 ↗
7. 10.3390/s1609135610.3390/s16091356 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.05.03010.1016/j.jconrel.2018.05.030 ↗
9. 10.1038/s41598-018-19804-110.1038/s41598-018-19804-1 ↗
10. 10.1126/science.121082210.1126/science.1210822 ↗
11. 10.1371/journal.pone.007619610.1371/journal.pone.0076196 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.sna.2019.04.02110.1016/j.sna.2019.04.021 ↗
13. 10.1002/aisy.20190008010.1002/aisy.201900080 ↗
14. 10.1002/adma.20120374010.1002/adma.201203740 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.10.02110.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.10.021 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.23710.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.237 ↗
17. McEvory M. A. · Science · 2015 · 347 · 6228