Fabrication of Thermally Stable Silver–Organic Complex (TS‐SOC) Based Conductible Filament Materials for 3D Printing
Source abstract
Abstract
Conductive 3D printing has the potential to easily customize parts in the electronics manufacturing industry, by minimizing the contents of conductive fillers. Here, 3D printable filament material with less than 3 wt% of preconductive fillers by forming silver–organic complex (SOC) is achieved. Thermally stable (TS)‐SOC with chelating agents is constructed, and thermal degradation is minimized to 0.91 wt%, even at high temperature under extrusion and 3D printing by the cage effect. In addition, a compact extruder, which has a short (3 cm) heating period, is directly designed, and applied to TS‐SOC‐based filament fabrication to minimize thermal degradation. Also, silver nanoparticles (SNPs) (diameter = 70–90 nm) are uniformly formed by dechelating and chemical reduction of the surface, and form dense conductive percolation networks. Finally, not only are electrical characteristics of a maximum 55.71 S cm−1 obtained, but the intrinsic short‐circuits from nozzle clogging problems of conventional conductive filament could be overcome.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Polymer Science and Engineering Chonnam National University Yongbong‐ro, Buk‐gu Gwangju 61186 Republic of Korea
Funding
Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China · Chonnam National University · National Research Foundation of Korea
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.486610.1103/PhysRevLett.82.4866 ↗
2. 10.1002/smll.20130300010.1002/smll.201303000 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.nantod.2016.04.00710.1016/j.nantod.2016.04.007 ↗
4. 10.1021/ja043425k10.1021/ja043425k ↗
5. Ahn B. Y. · J. Visualized Exp. · 2011 · 58 · 3189
6. 10.1039/C6LC00198J10.1039/C6LC00198J ↗
7. 10.1002/adma.20140033410.1002/adma.201400334 ↗
8. 10.1021/ja209267c10.1021/ja209267c ↗
9. 10.1126/science.116837510.1126/science.1168375 ↗
10. 10.1002/adma.20150621510.1002/adma.201506215 ↗
11. 10.1371/journal.pone.004936510.1371/journal.pone.0049365 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0477110.1021/acsnano.6b04771 ↗
13. 10.1002/smll.20140313110.1002/smll.201403131 ↗
14. 10.1002/adma.20150209210.1002/adma.201502092 ↗
15. 10.1007/s12195-015-0389-410.1007/s12195-015-0389-4 ↗
16. 10.5539/gjhs.v8n1p18010.5539/gjhs.v8n1p180 ↗
17. 10.1002/smll.20150059310.1002/smll.201500593 ↗
18. 10.1002/adfm.20100005510.1002/adfm.201000055 ↗
19. Park S. · Chem. Lett. · 2016 · 46 · 46
20. 10.1021/jo050132g10.1021/jo050132g ↗
21. 10.1016/S0927-7757(97)00087-310.1016/S0927-7757(97)00087-3 ↗
22. 10.1021/jp964087f10.1021/jp964087f ↗
23. 10.1007/978-1-4757-0854-710.1007/978-1-4757-0854-7 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.matlet.2005.03.03310.1016/j.matlet.2005.03.033 ↗
25. 10.1021/ma702051g10.1021/ma702051g ↗
26. 10.1016/j.polymer.2008.09.06810.1016/j.polymer.2008.09.068 ↗
27. 10.1002/adma.20150510910.1002/adma.201505109 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.01.02410.1016/j.matdes.2017.01.024 ↗
29. 10.1002/adma.20160421110.1002/adma.201604211 ↗
30. 10.1155/2015/95429010.1155/2015/954290 ↗
31. 10.1023/A:100899010941910.1023/A:1008990109419 ↗
32. 10.1021/bm034421v10.1021/bm034421v ↗
33. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.12.00310.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.12.003 ↗
34. 10.1139/v75-36510.1139/v75-365 ↗
35. 10.1021/ja210361z10.1021/ja210361z ↗
36. 10.1007/s10534-011-9422-910.1007/s10534-011-9422-9 ↗
37. 10.1016/S0045-6535(02)00305-310.1016/S0045-6535(02)00305-3 ↗
38. 10.1021/la960834o10.1021/la960834o ↗
39. 10.1016/S0927-7757(01)01040-810.1016/S0927-7757(01)01040-8 ↗
40. 10.1016/1359-0197(89)90069-610.1016/1359-0197(89)90069-6 ↗
41. 10.1021/cr00098a01010.1021/cr00098a010 ↗
42. Delcourt M. · Radiochem. Radioanal. Lett. · 1973 · 13 · 329
43. 10.1039/c2jm34569b10.1039/c2jm34569b ↗