Large‐Scale and Cost‐Effective Fabrication of Ultra‐Thin, Biodegradable Microelectrode Arrays and Pressure Sensors Using Laser Micromachining
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT This paper addresses the critical need for innovative fabrication strategies to advance wearable and implantable medical devices, emphasizing versatility, cost‐effectiveness, scalability, and large‐scale manufacturability. Specifically, the focus is on bioresorbable electronic devices like microelectrode arrays (MEAs), crucial for intracerebral neural recording and electrical stimulation, and implantable pressure sensors necessitating flexible and cytocompatible properties to enhance tissue compliance and minimize the risk of rejection. Traditional cleanroom‐based techniques have limitations in compatibility with most of the bioresorbable materials. To overcome this challenge, a mask‐free, contact‐less, and scalable fabrication strategy utilizing an advanced UV‐based laser system is proposed. The approach successfully demonstrates fabrication of flexible, cytocompatible, and biodegradable MEAs and pressure sensors. A biodegradable substrate is prepared using cost‐effective and transparent biodegradable material, i.e., chitosan, with biodegradable Zinc (Zn) electrodes. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) analysis reveals an impedance of 10 kΩ at 1 kHz. Also, as‐prepared chitosan exhibits good tensile strength and excellent cytocompatibility with smart muscle cells, demonstrating its suitability for implantable applications. The manufactured MEAs exhibit excellent stability under multiple bending angles, proving their reliable performance when interfacing with tissues. Furthermore, the fabricated electrodes are fully degraded in less than 2 days in phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS) solution, demonstrating excellent biodegradability.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Neuroscience and Neural Engineering · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Microelectronics Lab (meLAB) James Watt School of Engineering University of Glasgow Glasgow UK
Biomedical Engineering Division James Watt School of Engineering University of Glasgow Glasgow UK
Funding
UK Research and Innovation · Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Bioresorbable Insertion Aids for Brain Implantable Flexible Probes: a Comparative Study on Silk Fibroin, Alginate, and Disaccharides10.1002/anbr.202200117 ↗
2. 10.1002/advs.20241204410.1002/advs.202412044 ↗
3. Yalagala B. P. · 2024 · 25
4. 10.1002/admt.20230121010.1002/admt.202301210 ↗
5. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c0822710.1021/acssuschemeng.1c08227 ↗
6. M.Cerezo‐Sanchez B.Yalagala E.McGlynn E.Russell F.Walton andH.Heidari “Flexible Neural Probe Modelling for Optimal Microelectrode‐tissue Interaction ” in2022 29th IEEE International Conference on Electronics Circuits and Systems (ICECS)(IEEE 2022) 1–4 https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECS202256217.2022.9971129.10.1109/ICECS202256217.2022.9971129 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.cobme.2022.10042010.1016/j.cobme.2022.100420 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.12088910.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.120889 ↗
9. 10.3390/nano1105108510.3390/nano11051085 ↗
10. 10.1504/IJMPT.2003.00250210.1504/IJMPT.2003.002502 ↗
11. Ultraviolet Laser Ablation of Organic Polymers10.1021/cr00096a003 ↗
12. Laser‐based Microscale Patterning of Biodegradable Polymers for Biomedical Applications10.1504/IJMPT.2003.002502 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41467‐022‐34173‐010.1038/s41467‐022‐34173‐0 ↗
14. 10.1038/s41467‐022‐29645‐210.1038/s41467‐022‐29645‐2 ↗
15. B. P.Yalagala S.Deswal S. R. K.Vanjari andR.Dahiya “Flexible and Ultra‐fast Bioresorbable Nanofibers of Silk Fibroin‐PVA Composite ” in2021 IEEE international conference on flexible and printable sensors and systems (FLEPS)(IEEE 2021) 1–4 https://doi.org/10.1109/FLEPS51544.2021.9469701.10.1109/FLEPS51544.2021.9469701 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41583‐021‐00496‐y10.1038/s41583‐021‐00496‐y ↗
17. 10.29026/oea.2023.22002010.29026/oea.2023.220020 ↗
18. 10.1007/s10544‐021‐00552‐510.1007/s10544‐021‐00552‐5 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2020.10457010.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2020.104570 ↗
20. 10.1002/admt.20240185810.1002/admt.202401858 ↗
21. 10.1088/1758‐5090/7/4/04500710.1088/1758‐5090/7/4/045007 ↗
22. 10.1088/1741‐2560/12/3/03600210.1088/1741‐2560/12/3/036002 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.msec.2009.07.00610.1016/j.msec.2009.07.006 ↗
24. 10.3389/fnins.2021.66317410.3389/fnins.2021.663174 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.01.03810.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.01.038 ↗
26. 10.1088/1741‐2560/12/3/03600210.1088/1741‐2560/12/3/036002 ↗
27. 10.1038/nmat274510.1038/nmat2745 ↗
28. 10.1002/admt.20240185810.1002/admt.202401858 ↗
29. 10.1002/adhm.20230031810.1002/adhm.202300318 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.03310.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.033 ↗
31. Biodegradation Characteristics of chitin and chitosan Films
32. Z.Wang B.Prasad Yalagala M.Hafezi H.Heidari andA.Feeney “A Bioprotein‐Based Flexible and Self‐powered Pressure Sensor towards a Biomimic of an Artificial Pacinian Corpuscle ” in2023 30th IEEE International Conference on Electronics Circuits and Systems (ICECS)(IEEE 2023) 1–4.10.1109/ICECS58634.2023.10382948 ↗
33. 10.1002/admi.20240025210.1002/admi.202400252 ↗
34. 10.1007/s10544‐021‐00552‐510.1007/s10544‐021‐00552‐5 ↗
35. 10.1021/acsabm.5c0126310.1021/acsabm.5c01263 ↗