Innovation Meets Accessibility in Melt Electrowriting 3D Printer Design: Continuous Process Monitoring and Automation via Modular Software and Hardware
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT Significant efforts have been made to develop printers, monitoring systems, and closed‐loop control to enhance the complex melt electrowriting (MEW) process. However, the lack of standardization and modularity hinders the adaptation and integration of previous advancements, slowing technological progress. To address these challenges, an innovative hardware design that incorporates multiple cameras and a rotating collector platform, combined with an adaptable software architecture based on a standard open communication protocol, is presented. The software modules are created using open‐source and widely recognized commercial scientific libraries and applications and are shared via GitHub. As a hardware platform, standard Cartesian kinematics are utilized and enhanced by a turntable collector. This design enables continuous in‐process monitoring with fixed cameras, while ensuring straightforward motion planning. The versatility of the hardware and software was validated through automated parameter studies and 3D printing of structures with intentionally introduced defects, generating large process data volumes and demonstrating in‐process print defect detection. The previously unreported impact of nonideal camera perspectives is investigated, and future directions for kinematic‐agnostic monitoring systems are outlined. Overall, this work aims to motivate engineering and application‐focused research communities to adopt modularity and interoperability. This enhances the accessibility and reproducibility of MEW, thereby facilitating its adoption.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies · Electrodeposition and Electroless Coatings · Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Mechanical Medical and Process Engineering Queensland University of Technology Brisbane Australia
Max Planck Queensland Centre Brisbane Australia
School of Chemistry and Physics Queensland University of Technology Brisbane Australia
Phil and Penny Knight Campus for Accelerating Scientific Impact University of Oregon Eugene USA
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.addma.2022.10299810.1016/j.addma.2022.102998 ↗
2. 10.1002/smll.20180023210.1002/smll.201800232 ↗
3. 10.36922/ijb.111110.36922/ijb.1111 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.10.31910.1016/j.ceramint.2022.10.319 ↗
5. 10.1002/adfm.20180315110.1002/adfm.201803151 ↗
6. 10.1002/admt.20210022110.1002/admt.202100221 ↗
7. 10.1126/sciadv.adk385410.1126/sciadv.adk3854 ↗
8. 10.3791/5628910.3791/56289 ↗
9. 10.1088/1758‐5090/aafc4110.1088/1758‐5090/aafc41 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.addma.2024.10456910.1016/j.addma.2024.104569 ↗
11. 10.3390/mi1407143710.3390/mi14071437 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.03.05310.1016/j.matdes.2018.03.053 ↗
13. 10.1002/app.5221210.1002/app.52212 ↗
14. 10.1002/agt2.49510.1002/agt2.495 ↗
15. 10.1002/app.5095610.1002/app.50956 ↗
16. 10.48550/arXiv.2204.0951310.48550/arXiv.2204.09513 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.polymer.2024.12746610.1016/j.polymer.2024.127466 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ohx.2021.e0024610.1016/j.ohx.2021.e00246 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.polymer.2006.08.04210.1016/j.polymer.2006.08.042 ↗
20. 10.1002/macp.20210041710.1002/macp.202100417 ↗
21. 10.1002/mame.20220045010.1002/mame.202200450 ↗
22. 10.1002/pat.564110.1002/pat.5641 ↗
23. A.Hrynevich “Enhancement of Geometric Complexity and Predictability of Melt Electrowriting for Biomedical Applications Julius‐Maximilians‐Universität Würzburg Germany ” (2021):27–33 https://doi.org/10.25972/OPUS‐24764.
24. 10.1038/s44172‐024‐00302‐410.1038/s44172‐024‐00302‐4 ↗
25. 10.1002/pat.628010.1002/pat.6280 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.addma.2022.10276410.1016/j.addma.2022.102764 ↗
27. 10.1002/pat.575510.1002/pat.5755 ↗
28. 10.1002/smsc.20230002110.1002/smsc.202300021 ↗
29. 10.1038/s41598‐022‐24275‐610.1038/s41598‐022‐24275‐6 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.addma.2024.10443110.1016/j.addma.2024.104431 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.addma.2023.10360410.1016/j.addma.2023.103604 ↗
32. 10.1002/mame.20200068510.1002/mame.202000685 ↗
33. 10.1002/adma.20210051910.1002/adma.202100519 ↗
34. 10.1007/s12221‐016‐6303‐410.1007/s12221‐016‐6303‐4 ↗
35. S.Profanter A.Tekat K.Dorofeev M.Rickert andA.Knoll 2019 inIEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT) IEEE pp.955–962. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIT.2019.8755050.10.1109/ICIT.2019.8755050 ↗
36. P.Sommer F.Schellroth M.Fischer andJ.Schlechtendahl (2018):2018 IEEE 14th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE) IEEE pp.1217–1223 https://doi.org/10.1109/COASE.2018.8560493.10.1109/COASE.2018.8560493 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10902510.1016/j.matdes.2020.109025 ↗
38. 10.3389/fbioe.2020.0079310.3389/fbioe.2020.00793 ↗
39. 10.1002/mame.20210049610.1002/mame.202100496 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.matdes.2025.11414710.1016/j.matdes.2025.114147 ↗
41. 10.1088/1758‐5090/aba8ee10.1088/1758‐5090/aba8ee ↗
42. 10.1002/adpr.20210027410.1002/adpr.202100274 ↗
43. F.Wunner “Design and Development of an Additive Manufacturing Technology Platform for Melt Electrospinning Writing—A Systems Engineering Approach Queensland University of Technology Australia ” (2018):60 162 https://doi.org/10.5204/thesis.eprints.120081.10.5204/thesis.eprints.120081 ↗