A Highly Accurate, Stretchable Touchpad for Robust, Linear, and Stable Tactile Feedback
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract A stretchable and steady performance of human–machine interfaces and localized tactile perception is a broad concerning problem. Existing tactile sensors and touchpads claim to be stretchable for location detection failing to offer a location with uniformity during inevitable flexible movements, as well as linearity. The fabrication of a highly stretchable and transparent touch sensor, which is made of hydrogels and PDMS, could simultaneously and precisely determine location and pressure while being stretched or unstretched. It is noteworthy that the sensor introduces a new structure of resistant‐system into stretchable sensors, which needs only four electrodes in 3D helical structure without sacrificing linearity. A few drops of silicone oil are added to the interfaces to prevent the dehydration of the hydrogels, which is a common problem leading to device failure. In the same time, the transparency is improved significantly from 84.3% to 96%. Its interface application is demonstrated by practically using it for drawing, dialing numbers, calculating, and playing cards. Finite element analysis based on Ogden models indicates that the sensor shows instant response without delay, which is vital for super‐elastic materials based electronics.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Tactile and Sensory Interactions · Interactive and Immersive Displays
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Optical Imaging and Sensing Tsinghua‐Shenzhen International Graduate School Tsinghua University Shenzhen 518055 P. R. China
Department of Biomedical Engineering Tsinghua University Beijing 100084 P. R. China
Department of Physics Tsinghua University Beijing 100084 P. R. China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nnano.2011.18410.1038/nnano.2011.184 ↗
2. 10.1063/1.479414310.1063/1.4794143 ↗
3. 10.1002/adma.20150340710.1002/adma.201503407 ↗
4. 10.1002/adma.20170673810.1002/adma.201706738 ↗
5. 10.1007/s11431-017-9273-010.1007/s11431-017-9273-0 ↗
6. 10.1126/science.aaf881010.1126/science.aaf8810 ↗
7. S. P.Hotelling B. Q.Huppi J. A.Strickon D. R.Kerr I.Chaudhri G.Christie J. P.Ive P. J.Kennedy A. M.Faddell J. L.Robbin US Patent US8381135B2 2013.
8. 10.1029/95RG0026210.1029/95RG00262 ↗
9. 10.1109/JSEN.2013.226532510.1109/JSEN.2013.2265325 ↗
10. 10.1038/nnano.2008.8310.1038/nnano.2008.83 ↗
11. 10.1002/jbm.82007060410.1002/jbm.820070604 ↗
12. 10.1021/cr000108x10.1021/cr000108x ↗
13. 10.1021/bm060010d10.1021/bm060010d ↗
14. 10.1002/jps.106710.1002/jps.1067 ↗
15. 10.1038/ncomms1423010.1038/ncomms14230 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41578-018-0018-710.1038/s41578-018-0018-7 ↗
17. 10.1002/smll.20180171110.1002/smll.201801711 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.06.06110.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.06.061 ↗
19. 10.1002/adma.20170440310.1002/adma.201704403 ↗
20. 10.1126/science.124022810.1126/science.1240228 ↗
21. 10.1002/adma.20140344110.1002/adma.201403441 ↗
22. 10.1126/sciadv.160220010.1126/sciadv.1602200 ↗
23. 10.1038/s41427-019-0126-x10.1038/s41427-019-0126-x ↗
24. 10.1002/adma.20170218110.1002/adma.201702181 ↗
25. T.Young US Patent US5241308A 1993.
26. 10.1016/S1369-7021(10)70034-110.1016/S1369-7021(10)70034-1 ↗
27. 10.1002/adfm.20170419510.1002/adfm.201704195 ↗
28. Aguilar R. N. · Sensors · 2002 · 2 · 1360
29. 10.1063/1.325962410.1063/1.3259624 ↗
30. Lake M. A. · Proctoc. Exch. · 2015