journal article·2025-05Open access

High‐Performance 3D Printed Mechanically Interlocked Soft–Hard Interfaces of Hydrogels and Polylactide

L.B. Kunkels, M. Cruz Saldívar, N.E. Putra, C. Pitta Kruize, S. Panahkhahi, M.A. Leeflang, L.E. Fratila‐Apachitei, A.A. Zadpoor, M.J. Mirzaali

Advanced Materials Technologies· Volume 10· Issue 9

Abstract

Abstract High‐performance soft–hard interfaces are inherently difficult to fabricate due to the dissimilar mechanical properties of both materials, especially when connecting extremely soft biomaterials, such as hydrogels, to much harder biomaterials, such as rigid polymers. Nevertheless, there is significant clinical demand for synthetic soft–hard interfaces. Here, soft–hard interface geometries are proposed, designed with the aid of computational analyses and fabricated as 3D‐printed hydrogel‐to‐polylactide (PLA) structures. Two primary interlocking geometries (i.e., anti‐trapezoidal (AT) and double‐hook (DH)) are used to study the envelope of 2.5D geometric interlocking designs, fabricated through hybrid 3D printing, combining pneumatic extrusion with fused deposition modeling. Finite‐element analysis, uniaxial tensile tests, and digital image correlation (DIC) are used to characterize the geometries and identify parameters that significantly influence their mechanical performance. These findings reveal significant differences between geometric designs, where DH geometries performed significantly better than AT geometries, exhibiting a 190% increase in the maximum force, F max , and a 340% increase in the fracture toughness, W . Compared to the control groups (i.e., flat, inset, and 90° interfaces), F max and W values increased by 500%–990% and 350%–1200%, respectively. The findings of this study can serve as a guideline for the design and fabrication of efficient soft–hard interfaces with performances close to predicted values.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Biomechanical Engineering Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Delft University of Technology (TU Delft) Mekelweg 2 Delft 2628 CD The Netherlands

Research Group Technology for Healthcare Centre of Expertise Health Innovation The Hague University of Applied Science Delft 2628 AL The Netherlands

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2008.01.00410.1016/j.ijmecsci.2008.01.004 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.eml.2023.10201610.1016/j.eml.2023.102016 ↗
3. 10.1557/mrc.2017.9110.1557/mrc.2017.91 ↗
4. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c0062010.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c00620 ↗
5. 10.1002/jor.2006710.1002/jor.20067 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.12.00410.1016/j.tibtech.2012.12.004 ↗
7. 10.3390/app1117782110.3390/app11177821 ↗
8. 10.1093/rb/rbac09110.1093/rb/rbac091 ↗
9. 10.1002/smll.20220449810.1002/smll.202204498 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.cobme.2024.10054610.1016/j.cobme.2024.100546 ↗
11. 10.3390/curroncol3111053110.3390/curroncol31110531 ↗
12. 10.1586/17434440.6.1.6110.1586/17434440.6.1.61 ↗
13. 10.1007/978-3-319-76711-6_1910.1007/978-3-319-76711-6_19 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.10413710.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104137 ↗
15. 10.1038/s41467-023-43422-910.1038/s41467-023-43422-9 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.addma.2022.10306210.1016/j.addma.2022.103062 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.xcrp.2023.10155210.1016/j.xcrp.2023.101552 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.addma.2021.10249510.1016/j.addma.2021.102495 ↗
19. 10.1007/978-3-319-22345-2_1110.1007/978-3-319-22345-2_11 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.06.00310.1016/j.tibtech.2019.06.003 ↗
21. 10.22190/FUME190312023B10.22190/FUME190312023B ↗
22. 10.1021/bi049380h10.1021/bi049380h ↗
23. 10.1007/978-1-4614-3317-010.1007/978-1-4614-3317-0 ↗
24. 10.3109/03008207.2015.108986610.3109/03008207.2015.1089866 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.12.03610.1016/j.actbio.2016.12.036 ↗
26. 10.1038/nmat486310.1038/nmat4863 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jmps.2014.08.01110.1016/j.jmps.2014.08.011 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2005.10.01010.1016/j.engfracmech.2005.10.010 ↗
29. 10.1039/C5TB00393H10.1039/C5TB00393H ↗
30. 10.1016/j.eng.2022.03.00810.1016/j.eng.2022.03.008 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.06.02310.1016/j.actbio.2016.06.023 ↗
32. 10.3390/ma1515545710.3390/ma15155457 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.07.00610.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.07.006 ↗
34. 10.1007/s11837-015-1367-y10.1007/s11837-015-1367-y ↗
35. The Definitive Guide to ASTM D412 Tensile Testing of Elastomers https://www.instron.com/en/testing‐solutions/astm‐standards/astm‐d412(accessed: May 2023).
36. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11186710.1016/j.compstruct.2020.111867 ↗
37. Mandelbrot B. · SIAM Rev. · 1961 · 3 · 80
38. 10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.59110.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591 ↗