Humanoid Robot Actuation through Precise Chemical Sensing Signals
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract As the need for assistive robots increases in aging societies, various assistive robot systems including humanoid robots have been developed. Humanoid robotic hands are one of the most useful parts to assist humans efficiently. While sensing pressure or temperature from the robotic hands is extensively studied, sensing chemicals is less widely studied despite the significant importance. Here, a unique platform of smartly moving humanoid fingers actuated by chemical sensing is reported. The sensor is printed with disposable and biocompatible cellulose conductive ink materials. Rf intensity change of the sensor with NH4+ membrane depends on NH4+ ion concentration where R² is 0.9576. The smart bending motion of a finger is accomplished by logically programed actuation through detecting the change of interested ion concentration from 0.01 to 1 m at the ion‐selective membrane electrode (ISME) sensor with resulted bending angles from 10° to 67° accordingly. The overall signal‐to‐noise ratio is over 10. This sensing robot concept may be expanded to applications of microrobots which receive external stimulus, judge, and execute the actuation to carry out programed tasks.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Analytical Chemistry and Sensors · Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Additive Manufacturing Laboratory School of Mechatronic Systems Engineering Simon Fraser University Surrey V3T 0A3 BC Canada
Funding
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.smhl.2018.03.00210.1016/j.smhl.2018.03.002 ↗
2. Feil‐Seifer D. · 2005
3. 10.1163/016918610X53850710.1163/016918610X538507 ↗
4. 10.1007/s10514-016-9562-410.1007/s10514-016-9562-4 ↗
5. 10.5853/jos.2013.15.3.17410.5853/jos.2013.15.3.174 ↗
6. Naotunna I. · 2015
7. Takashima R. · 2017
8. Fukaya N. · 2017
9. 10.19026/rjaset.7.40210.19026/rjaset.7.402 ↗
10. 10.2490/jjrm1963.15.6510.2490/jjrm1963.15.65 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.robot.2015.07.01510.1016/j.robot.2015.07.015 ↗
12. 10.1088/0957-0233/27/2/02510510.1088/0957-0233/27/2/025105 ↗
13. 10.1021/acssensors.8b0077810.1021/acssensors.8b00778 ↗
14. 10.5194/jsss-8-87-201910.5194/jsss-8-87-2019 ↗
15. 10.1002/adma.20180006610.1002/adma.201800066 ↗
16. 10.1002/adfm.20160628710.1002/adfm.201606287 ↗
17. Tanaka H. · J. Robot. · 2013 · 2013 · 608191
18. 10.1021/acsami.7b0706310.1021/acsami.7b07063 ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b0046510.1021/acs.accounts.8b00465 ↗
20. 10.1021/acssensors.6b0025010.1021/acssensors.6b00250 ↗
21. 10.1021/ed051p54110.1021/ed051p541 ↗
22. Armstrong R. D. · ChemInform · 1990 · 21
23. 10.1109/JSEN.2016.255053710.1109/JSEN.2016.2550537 ↗
24. 10.3390/s15071672910.3390/s150716729 ↗
25. 10.1088/2058-8585/aa5ef910.1088/2058-8585/aa5ef9 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.bios.2010.09.05510.1016/j.bios.2010.09.055 ↗
27. 10.1109/4.79262010.1109/4.792620 ↗
28. 10.2174/156802661131307000210.2174/1568026611313070002 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.07.00510.1016/j.jconrel.2017.07.005 ↗
30. 10.1002/aelm.20197000710.1002/aelm.201970007 ↗
31. 10.1109/JMEMS.2016.260229810.1109/JMEMS.2016.2602298 ↗
32. 10.1109/JRPROC.1928.22130910.1109/JRPROC.1928.221309 ↗
33. 10.6028/bulletin.03410.6028/bulletin.034 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.03.13910.1016/j.electacta.2015.03.139 ↗
35. 10.3390/s1807206210.3390/s18072062 ↗
36. 10.1002/aisy.20190001910.1002/aisy.201900019 ↗