Performance Comparison of Shape Memory Polymer Structures Printed by Fused Deposition Modeling and Melt Electrowriting
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Fused deposition modeling (FDM) and melt electrowriting (MEW) are techniques that use polymer fibers as building blocks for printing complex 3D structures, with fibers at the macroscopic and micrometer scale. Here, FDM and MEW are used to produce fibers of shape memory polymer at two different scales, and compare the performance of these fibers, in terms of shape fixity, shape recovery, and self‐healing properties. FDM and MEW are used for 4D printing of a shape memory polymer blend of thermoplastic poly(ε‐caprolactone) (30% by wt.) and a soft thermoplastic elastomer polyurethane (70% by wt.) at two different scales. The shape transformation from a programmed temporary state to the printed permanent shape in response to temperature as the stimuli imparts the 4D aspect to the printing. The mean fiber diameter of shape memory polymer produced by FDM and MEW is 340 and 40 µm, respectively. The manufactured fibers show an excellent shape fixity ratio (≈95%) and shape recovery properties (>84%). MEW fibers show a 1.5x faster recovery rate than FDM fibers due to the scaling effect. The excellent shape memory properties are complemented by self‐healing characteristics in the printed fibers. Additionally, MEW of a shape memory polymer is directly performed on a cylindrical collector to obtain tubular constructs which can potentially be used as stents for coronary or vascular applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Polymer composites and self-healing · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Microsystems Laboratory École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) 1015 Lausanne Switzerland
School of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering The University of New South Wales Sydney NSW 2052 Australia
Funding
HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.mser.2022.10070210.1016/j.mser.2022.100702 ↗
2. 10.1039/C8TA07716A10.1039/C8TA07716A ↗
3. 10.1002/adem.20230107410.1002/adem.202301074 ↗
4. 10.1016/S1369-7021(10)70128-010.1016/S1369-7021(10)70128-0 ↗
5. Lendlein A. · 2002
6. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.08.01110.1016/j.compositesa.2009.08.011 ↗
7. 10.1002/app.5084710.1002/app.50847 ↗
8. 10.1038/nature0349610.1038/nature03496 ↗
9. 10.1002/marc.20060022510.1002/marc.200600225 ↗
10. 10.1002/adma.20150313210.1002/adma.201503132 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.addma.2021.10202410.1016/j.addma.2021.102024 ↗
12. 10.1002/adfm.20211058010.1002/adfm.202110580 ↗
13. 10.1002/mame.20200029510.1002/mame.202000295 ↗
14. 10.1007/s10965-022-03095-210.1007/s10965-022-03095-2 ↗
15. 10.1007/s11837-020-04013-x10.1007/s11837-020-04013-x ↗
16. 10.1021/acsami.0c1860810.1021/acsami.0c18608 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsabm.0c0149510.1021/acsabm.0c01495 ↗
18. 10.1002/adma.20220924410.1002/adma.202209244 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.polymer.2023.12616010.1016/j.polymer.2023.126160 ↗
20. 10.1126/sciadv.adk385410.1126/sciadv.adk3854 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2022.11138510.1016/j.eurpolymj.2022.111385 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.05.01410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.05.014 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.matlet.2011.06.08310.1016/j.matlet.2011.06.083 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.05.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2015.05.004 ↗
25. 10.1002/smtd.20220158910.1002/smtd.202201589 ↗
26. 10.1002/adfm.20190466410.1002/adfm.201904664 ↗
27. 10.1002/adhm.20200123210.1002/adhm.202001232 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsami.2c0107810.1021/acsami.2c01078 ↗
29. 10.1002/marc.20240001010.1002/marc.202400010 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.addma.2023.10360410.1016/j.addma.2023.103604 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.10.00310.1016/j.compscitech.2018.10.003 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.07.02310.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.07.023 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsami.0c1364510.1021/acsami.0c13645 ↗
34. 10.1021/am405101k10.1021/am405101k ↗
35. 10.1016/j.polymer.2023.12618910.1016/j.polymer.2023.126189 ↗
36. 10.1002/advs.20200137910.1002/advs.202001379 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.11.02310.1016/j.jmapro.2018.11.023 ↗
38. 10.1039/D1LC00518A10.1039/D1LC00518A ↗
39. 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.10954610.1016/j.matdes.2021.109546 ↗
40. 10.1111/aor.1385110.1111/aor.13851 ↗
41. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.00090110.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.000901 ↗
42. 10.1161/01.CIR.102.4.39910.1161/01.CIR.102.4.399 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.05.03610.1016/j.matdes.2018.05.036 ↗
44. 10.1002/mabi.20190031210.1002/mabi.201900312 ↗
45. 10.1021/acsnano.0c0357010.1021/acsnano.0c03570 ↗
46. T.Kangur Master Thesis Developing Melt Electrowriting on an Open‐Source Fused Filament Fabrication Platform 2022.