journal article·2023-03Open access

Tuning the Solar Performance of Building Facades through Polymer 3D Printing: Toward Bespoke Thermo‐Optical Properties

Valeria Piccioni, Matthias Leschok, Lars O. Grobe, Stephen Wasilewski, Bharath Seshadri, Illias Hischier, Arno Schlüter

Advanced Materials Technologies· Volume 8· Issue 6

Abstract

Abstract Façades are the primary interface controlling the flow of solar energy in buildings and affecting their energy balance and environmental impact. Recently, large‐scale 3D printing (3DP) of translucent polymers has been explored as a technique for fabricating façade components with bespoke properties and functionalities. Transmissivity is essential for building facades, as the response to solar radiation is crucial to obtaining comfort and greatly affects electricity and cooling demands. However, it is still unclear how 3DP parameters affect the optical properties of translucent polymers. This study establishes an experimental procedure to relate the optical properties of PETG components to design and 3DP parameters. It is observed that printing parameters control layer deposition, which governs internal light scattering in the layers and overall light transmission. Moreover, the layer resolution determines angle‐dependent properties. It is shown that printing parameters can be tuned to obtain tailored optical properties, from high normal transparency (≈90%) to translucency (≈60%), and with a range of haze levels (≈55–97%). These findings present an opportunity for large‐scale 3DP of bespoke façades, which can selectively admit or block solar radiation and provide uniform daylighting of a space. In the context of the building sector decarbonization, such components hold great potential for reducing emissions while ensuring occupant comfort.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Building Energy and Comfort Optimization · Architecture and Computational Design

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Architecture and Building Systems Institute of Technology in Architecture, ETH Zürich 8093 Zürich Switzerland

NCCR Digital Fabrication, ETH Zürich 8093 Zürich Switzerland

Digital Building Technologies Institute of Technology in Architecture, ETH Zürich 8093 Zürich Switzerland

Competence Centre Envelopes and Solar Energy Lucerne University of Applied Sciences and Arts (HSLU) 6005 Lucerne Switzerland

Laboratory of Integrated Performance in Design École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) 1015 Lausanne Switzerland

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung

References (69)

Show source-provided references
1. IEA Buildings 2022.https://www.iea.org/reports/buildings (accessed: January2023).
2. United Nations Environment Programme 2022 Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction: Towards a Zero‑emission Efficient and Resilient Buildings and Construction Sector Nairobi2022.
3. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.11410710.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114107 ↗
4. IEA Tracking Buildings 2021 – Analysis 2021 https://www.iea.org/reports/tracking-buildings-2021
5. Aksamija A. · Adv. Build. Energy Res. · 2015 · 10 · 1
6. 10.1002/aenm.20160112210.1002/aenm.201601122 ↗
7. IEA Building Envelopes – Analysis 2022.https://www.iea.org/reports/building-envelopes(accessed: January 2023).
8. 10.1016/j.rser.2013.04.01610.1016/j.rser.2013.04.016 ↗
9. Juaristi M. · J. Facade Des. Eng. · 2018 · 6 · 107
10. 10.1038/s41560-019-0424-010.1038/s41560-019-0424-0 ↗
11. 10.1080/17512549.2015.111905810.1080/17512549.2015.1119058 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.scib.2019.11.00210.1016/j.scib.2019.11.002 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.scib.2020.03.01410.1016/j.scib.2020.03.014 ↗
14. Bach R. · J. Facade Des. Eng. · 2019 · 7 · 13
15. 10.1088/1757-899X/324/1/01208810.1088/1757-899X/324/1/012088 ↗
16. 10.1089/3dp.2018.015710.1089/3dp.2018.0157 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.10695710.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106957 ↗
18. M. B.Mungenast Dissertation Technische Universität München München2019.
19. Taseva Y. · 2020 · 183
20. S. R.Snooks Sensilab Studio 2017 http://www.rolandsnooks.com/#/sensilab-studio/(accessed: January 2023).
21. Sarakinioti M.‐V. · J. Facade Des. Eng. · 2018 · 6 · 029
22. 10.1007/s11367-020-01804-x10.1007/s11367-020-01804-x ↗
23. 10.1371/journal.pone.025318110.1371/journal.pone.0253181 ↗
24. M.Ghasemieshkaftaki M. A.Ortiz P. M.Bluyssen Healthy Buildings Europe 2021 Online Conference 2021 https://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid%3Afd2c5f3c‐56d2‐4f8d‐83a7‐d65677ba2037 (accessed: January 2023).
25. 10.1038/s41586-018-0474-710.1038/s41586-018-0474-7 ↗
26. 10.1038/s41467-020-15316-710.1038/s41467-020-15316-7 ↗
27. 10.1108/RPJ-11-2020-028410.1108/RPJ-11-2020-0284 ↗
28. P.Petrov D.Agzamova V.Pustovalov E.Zhikhareva B.Saprykin I.Chmutin N.Shmakova Research into the effect of the 3D‐printing mode on changing the properties of PETG transparent plastic2021 https://popups.uliege.be/esaform21/index.php?id=3763(accessed: January 2023).10.25518/esaform21.3763 ↗
29. 10.1007/s11665-021-06032-410.1007/s11665-021-06032-4 ↗
30. 10.1007/s10853-020-05057-910.1007/s10853-020-05057-9 ↗
31. 10.1122/1.497683910.1122/1.4976839 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.addma.2016.06.00710.1016/j.addma.2016.06.007 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c0063310.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c00633 ↗
34. 10.1039/D1LC00518A10.1039/D1LC00518A ↗
35. 10.1002/pen.76004011410.1002/pen.760040114 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.yofte.2020.10229910.1016/j.yofte.2020.102299 ↗
37. 10.1088/1361-6439/aa5ae310.1088/1361-6439/aa5ae3 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.10945410.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109454 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.solener.2015.01.04110.1016/j.solener.2015.01.041 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.solener.2017.12.02910.1016/j.solener.2017.12.029 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.solener.2013.09.03210.1016/j.solener.2013.09.032 ↗
42. ASTM A. I. ASTM D1003 ‐ Standard test method for haze and luminous transmittance of transparent plastics https://www.astm.org/d1003-00.html(accessed: January 2023).
43. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.11.01210.1016/j.addma.2018.11.012 ↗
44. 10.1007/s10924-019-01544-610.1007/s10924-019-01544-6 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.10777410.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107774 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.11189010.1016/j.enbuild.2022.111890 ↗
47. 10.3233/FDE-16119110.3233/FDE-161191 ↗
48. 10.1088/1742-6596/2042/1/01218010.1088/1742-6596/2042/1/012180 ↗
49. 10.1007/s12273-018-0466-410.1007/s12273-018-0466-4 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.solener.2006.06.01510.1016/j.solener.2006.06.015 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.10.01010.1016/j.enbuild.2014.10.010 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.07.01910.1016/j.buildenv.2016.07.019 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.11435610.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114356 ↗
54. 10.1016/0003-6870(72)90102-010.1016/0003-6870(72)90102-0 ↗
55. 10.1007/s11356-020-10657-810.1007/s11356-020-10657-8 ↗
56. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Maptis ‐ materials and processes technical information system https://maptis.nasa.gov/Features(accessed: January 2023).
57. Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel (ASAP) Agate statistical analysis program https://agate.niar.wichita.edu/(accessed: January 2023).
58. Minitab Data Analysis Software—Statistical Software Package https://www.minitab.com/en-us/products/minitab/(accessed: January 2023).
59. F. G.Giesbrecht M. L.Gumperrtz Frontmatter. inPlanning Construction and Statistical Analysis of Comparative Experiments (Eds:W. A.Shewhart S. S.Wilks) Wiley New York2004 pp.i–xiv.10.1002/0471476471 ↗
60. 10.3390/polym1310158710.3390/polym13101587 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.rcim.2017.09.00710.1016/j.rcim.2017.09.007 ↗
62. Stover J. C. · 2012
63. 10.1117/12.86088910.1117/12.860889 ↗
64. D.Geisler‐Moroder E. S.Lee G.Ward B.Bueno L. O.Grobe T.Wang B.Deroisy BSDF Generation Procedures for Daylighting Systems IEA SHC Task 61 2021.10.18777/ieashc-task61-2021-0001 ↗
65. Apian‐Bennewitz P. · 2014 · 1
66. Ward G. · 2014 · 5
67. 10.1145/335042810.1145/3350428 ↗
68. Radiance RADSITE2013 https://www.radiance-online.org/archived/radsite/radiance/refer/long.html(accessed: January 2023).
69. Nicodemus F. E. · 1992 · 94