Nonplanar 3D Printing of Epoxy Using Freeform Reversible Embedding
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Thermally cured thermoset polymers such as epoxies are widely used in industry and manufacturing due to their thermal, chemical, and electrical resistance, and mechanical strength and toughness. However, it can be challenging to 3D print thermally cured thermosets without rheological modification because they tend to flow and not hold their shape when extruded due to cure times of minutes to hours. 3D printing inside a support bath addresses this by allowing the liquid polymer to be held in place until the thermoset is fully cured and expands the structures that can be printed as extrusion is not limited to layer‐by‐layer. Here, the use of Freeform Reversible Embedding (FRE) to 3D print off‐the‐shelf thermoset epoxy into lattice structures using nonplanar extrusion is reported. To do this, the authors investigate how extrusion direction in 3D space impacts epoxy filament morphology and fusion at filament intersections. Furthermore, the advantages of this approach are shown by using nonplanar printing to produce lattice geometries that show ≈ four times greater specific modulus compared with lattice structures printed using other materials and printing techniques.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Science & Engineering Carnegie Mellon University 5000 Forbes Avenue Pittsburgh PA 15213 USA
Human‐Computer Interaction Institute Carnegie Mellon University 5000 Forbes Avenue Pittsburgh PA 15213 USA
Department of Biomedical Engineering Carnegie Mellon University 5000 Forbes Avenue Pittsburgh PA 15213 USA
Funding
National Science Foundation · Carnegie Mellon University
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jiec.2015.03.02610.1016/j.jiec.2015.03.026 ↗
2. Varma I. K. · 2018 · 1
3. 10.1016/j.paerosci.2018.01.00110.1016/j.paerosci.2018.01.001 ↗
4. 10.1006/jcis.2000.695310.1006/jcis.2000.6953 ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b0687010.1021/acs.iecr.9b06870 ↗
6. 10.1088/1757-899X/161/1/01204510.1088/1757-899X/161/1/012045 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10813710.1016/j.matdes.2019.108137 ↗
8. Mahmoud D. · J. Manuf. Mater. Process. · 2017 · 1 · 13
9. 10.1016/S1007-0214(06)70228-010.1016/S1007-0214(06)70228-0 ↗
10. 10.1002/adma.20140180410.1002/adma.201401804 ↗
11. 10.1073/pnas.171515711510.1073/pnas.1715157115 ↗
12. 10.1038/srep4340110.1038/srep43401 ↗
13. 10.1039/C7MH00043J10.1039/C7MH00043J ↗
14. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b0017010.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00170 ↗
15. 10.1371/journal.pone.019489010.1371/journal.pone.0194890 ↗
16. 10.1126/sciadv.160280010.1126/sciadv.1602800 ↗
17. 10.1126/sciadv.150065510.1126/sciadv.1500655 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsami.0c1960810.1021/acsami.0c19608 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.addma.2021.10234810.1016/j.addma.2021.102348 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.mfglet.2022.07.07910.1016/j.mfglet.2022.07.079 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.addlet.2022.10003010.1016/j.addlet.2022.100030 ↗
22. 10.1126/sciadv.150075810.1126/sciadv.1500758 ↗
23. 10.1126/science.aav905110.1126/science.aav9051 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c0113310.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c01133 ↗
25. 10.1002/adhm.20190173510.1002/adhm.201901735 ↗
26. Slic3r Manual – Flow Math https://manual.slic3r.org/advanced/flow-math(accessed: December 2021).
27. 10.1177/002199830810203510.1177/0021998308102035 ↗
28. 10.1088/0960-1317/24/12/12700210.1088/0960-1317/24/12/127002 ↗
29. Wave Spring vs. Coil Spring Smalley.https://www.smalley.com/blog/wave-spring-vs-coil-spring(accessed: December 2021).
30. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2013.01.00610.1016/j.ijmecsci.2013.01.006 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.10156310.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101563 ↗
32. 10.1371/journal.pone.019489010.1371/journal.pone.0194890 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ohx.2020.e0017010.1016/j.ohx.2020.e00170 ↗