journal article·2016-12

CNT‐Based Artificial Hair Sensors for Predictable Boundary Layer Air Flow Sensing

Keith A. Slinker, Corey Kondash, Benjamin T. Dickinson, Jeffery W. Baur

Advanced Materials Technologies· Volume 1· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

While numerous flow sensor architectures mimic the natural cilia of crickets, locusts, bats, and fish, the prediction of sensor output for given flow conditions based on the sensor properties has not been achieved. Challenges include difficulty in determining the electromechanical properties of the sensors, limited working knowledge of the boundary layer, low sensitivity to small hair deflections, and lack of models for large deflections. Within this work, hair sensors are fabricated using piezoresistive arrays of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) without traditional microelectromechanical processing. While correlating the CNT array electromechanical properties to synthesis conditions remains a challenge, a consistent, proportional, and predictable response to steady, boundary‐determined air flow is obtained using theory and measurement for various lengths of hairs. The moment sensitivity is shown to scale inversely with the CNT length and stiffness to a typical maximum of 1.3 ± 0.4% resistance change nN−1 m−1. The normalized CNT piezoresistivity is constant (1.1 ± 0.2) for a majority of the more than two dozen sensors examined despite the orders‐of‐magnitude variability in both sensitivity and CNT compressive modulus. The sensor sensitivity and noise both distinctly change as the flow transitions from steady and laminar to turbulent, suggesting the sensor may be capable of detecting flow transitions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Biomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Universal Technology Corporation Materials and Manufacturing Directorate Air Force Research Laboratory 2941 Hobson Way Wright‐Patterson Air Force Base OH 45433 USA

Munitions Directorate Air Force Research Laboratory 101 W Eglin Blvd Eglin Air Force Base FL 32542 USA

Materials and Manufacturing Directorate Air Force Research Laboratory 2941 Hobson Way Wright‐Patterson Air Force Base OH 45433 USA

Funding

Air Force Office of Scientific Research

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Ozaki Y. · 2000 · 531
2. 10.1088/0960-1317/12/5/32210.1088/0960-1317/12/5/322 ↗
3. Dickinson B. T. · 2006
4. 10.1088/1748-3182/5/1/01600210.1088/1748-3182/5/1/016002 ↗
5. 10.3390/s710238910.3390/s7102389 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.sna.2010.02.00210.1016/j.sna.2010.02.002 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.sna.2009.02.00310.1016/j.sna.2009.02.003 ↗
8. 10.1109/JMEMS.2007.90243610.1109/JMEMS.2007.902436 ↗
9. 10.1088/1748-3190/10/1/01600110.1088/1748-3190/10/1/016001 ↗
10. 10.1088/0960-1317/15/7/01910.1088/0960-1317/15/7/019 ↗
11. 10.1007/s00359005024510.1007/s003590050245 ↗
12. 10.1117/12.72180710.1117/12.721807 ↗
13. 10.1038/srep1933610.1038/srep19336 ↗
14. 10.1088/0957-0233/25/9/09500510.1088/0957-0233/25/9/095005 ↗
15. 10.1088/1748-3190/11/3/03600810.1088/1748-3190/11/3/036008 ↗
16. 10.1088/0964-1726/21/11/11300110.1088/0964-1726/21/11/113001 ↗
17. 10.1078/0944-2006-0008210.1078/0944-2006-00082 ↗
18. 10.1002/adma.20130528510.1002/adma.201305285 ↗
19. 10.1088/0964-1726/24/11/11502610.1088/0964-1726/24/11/115026 ↗
20. 10.1088/0964-1726/21/9/09402410.1088/0964-1726/21/9/094024 ↗
21. Ehlert G. J. · 2011 · 79771C
22. 10.1038/nnano.2007.18610.1038/nnano.2007.186 ↗
23. 10.1117/12.208556810.1117/12.2085568 ↗
24. Slinker K. · 2015
25. 10.1115/smasis2014‐770710.1115/smasis2014‐7707 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.04.00410.1016/j.carbon.2012.04.004 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.09.01310.1016/j.carbon.2013.09.013 ↗
28. 10.7551/mitpress/3014.001.000110.7551/mitpress/3014.001.0001 ↗
29. White F. M. · 1974 · 725
30. White F. M. · 1979
31. 10.1007/s00348-005-0969-510.1007/s00348-005-0969-5 ↗