journal article·2016-08Open access

Nanopatterning‐Enhanced Sensitivity and Response Time of Dynamic Palladium/Cobalt/Palladium Hydrogen Gas Sensors

Chris Lueng, Pierpaolo Lupo, Peter J. Metaxas, Mikhail Kostylev, Adekunle O. Adeyeye

Advanced Materials Technologies· Volume 1· Issue 5

Abstract

Clear advantages of nanopatterned Pd/Co films over continuous Pd/Co films are demonstrated as candidates for future hydrogen gas sensing devices based upon hydrogen‐absorption‐modified ferromagnetic resonance. Nanopatterning results in a higher sensitivity to hydrogen gas and a much faster hydrogen desorption rate. It also avoids the need for an external biasing magnetic field which may be important for practical sensor implementation. A wide range of hydrogen gas concentrations has been detected with the nanopatterned material: from 0.1% to 50%, across the threshold of hydrogen flammability in air (4%).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Analytical Chemistry and Sensors · Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Physics M013 The University of Western Australia 6009 Crawley WA Australia

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering National University of Singapore Singapore

Funding

Australian Research Council · University of Western Australia · National Research Foundation Singapore

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.05.04210.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.05.042 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.04.17610.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.04.176 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.snb.2011.04.07010.1016/j.snb.2011.04.070 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.03.01010.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.03.010 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0304-8853(01)00596-010.1016/S0304-8853(01)00596-0 ↗
6. 10.1063/1.481266410.1063/1.4812664 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.tsf.2013.01.02210.1016/j.tsf.2013.01.022 ↗
8. 10.1063/1.472979710.1063/1.4729797 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.09443210.1103/PhysRevB.83.094432 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.345234910.1063/1.3452349 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.480092310.1063/1.4800923 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.489358810.1063/1.4893588 ↗
13. 10.1109/TMAG.2015.245739310.1109/TMAG.2015.2457393 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.physe.2014.12.02710.1016/j.physe.2014.12.027 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.05442510.1103/PhysRevB.84.054425 ↗
16. Lueng C. · 2014
17. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.04.05110.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.04.051 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.04.14510.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.04.145 ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRevB.49.1288810.1103/PhysRevB.49.12888 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.34224310.1063/1.342243 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.07.00410.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.07.004 ↗
22. 10.1021/nn101475c10.1021/nn101475c ↗
23. 10.1063/1.44710210.1063/1.447102 ↗
24. 10.1088/0957-4484/15/11/02910.1088/0957-4484/15/11/029 ↗
25. 10.1063/1.368717710.1063/1.3687177 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.492228510.1063/1.4922285 ↗
27. C.Lueng P. J.Metaxas M.Kostylev unpublished.
28. E. N.Ivanov M.Kostylev arXiv:1402.3459 2014.