Active Posts in Deterministic Lateral Displacement Devices
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Using electrically connected metal‐coated posts in a deterministic lateral displacement (DLD) device and applying electric fields, electrokinetics is used to tune separations, significantly decrease the critical size for separation, and increase the dynamic range with switching times on the order of seconds. The strength of DLD stems from its binary behavior. To first approximation, particles move in one out of two trajectories based on their effective size. For particles that are close to the threshold size, a small external force is sufficient to nudge the particles from one trajectory to another. The devices consist of arrays of cylindrical metal‐coated SU‐8 posts connected by an underlying metal layer. This allows the application of voltages at the post surfaces and the generation of electric field gradients between neighboring posts, causing polarizable particles to experience a dielectrophoretic (DEP) force. This force, which depends on the volume and polarizability of the particle, can be made sufficient to push particles from one trajectory into another. In this way, the critical size in a device, normally fixed by the geometry, can be tuned. What's more, adding DEP in this way allows for the simultaneous creation of multiple size fractions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies · Electrowetting and Microfluidic Technologies · Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Division of Solid State Physics and NanoLund Lund University Lund SE‐221 00 Sweden
Laboratory of Life Sciences Electronics École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne Lausanne CH‐1015 Switzerland
Funding
Vetenskapsrådet · Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.109456710.1126/science.1094567 ↗
2. Occasionally when we do not need to be specific about whether we refer to the radius or the diameter we use the term critical size instead.
3. 10.1039/b719449h10.1039/b719449h ↗
4. 10.1039/C5LC01051A10.1039/C5LC01051A ↗
5. 10.1038/s41467-018-03596-z10.1038/s41467-018-03596-z ↗
6. 10.1039/b823275j10.1039/b823275j ↗
7. 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)73977-510.1016/S0006-3495(02)73977-5 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.bios.2017.02.04710.1016/j.bios.2017.02.047 ↗
9. Keim K. · Electrophoresis · 2019
10. 10.1109/JMEMS.2006.88953010.1109/JMEMS.2006.889530 ↗
11. 10.1109/JMEMS.2016.253900010.1109/JMEMS.2016.2539000 ↗
12. Davis J. A. · 2008
13. 10.1016/j.jcis.2010.10.02010.1016/j.jcis.2010.10.020 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.493717110.1063/1.4937171 ↗
15. 10.1039/C7LC00785J10.1039/C7LC00785J ↗
16. Kim S. C. · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA · 2017 · 114 · E5034
17. Pethig R. R. · 2017 · 44810.1002/9781118671443 ↗
18. 10.1073/pnas.060596710310.1073/pnas.0605967103 ↗
19. 10.3390/mi612146510.3390/mi6121465 ↗