journal article·2019-08

Selective Electroplating for 3D‐Printed Electronics

Nathan Lazarus, Sarah S. Bedair, Sami H. Hawasli, Myung Jun Kim, Benjamin J. Wiley, Gabriel L. Smith

Advanced Materials Technologies· Volume 4· Issue 8
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Creating 3D‐printed parts with embedded circuitry is the next frontier in additive manufacturing, but printing of conductors with performance comparable to bulk metals such as copper is a difficult challenge. A hybrid process based on 3D printing followed by electroplating on highly conductive thermoplastic filament is used to manufacture 3D circuit boards and electronic packaging. Dual extruder heads on a standard fused filament fabrication printer are used to selectively define regions for electroplating, allowing distinct traces and multiple materials to be patterned in the same 3D‐printed parts. Using this approach, a 3D‐printed surface‐mount package and a 555 timer oscillator circuit are demonstrated, including soldering of components onto the electroplated copper surface.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies · Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

US Army Research Laboratory 2800 Powder Mill Road Adelphi MD 20783 USA

Department of Chemistry Duke University 124 Science Drive, Box 90354 Durham NC 27708 USA

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s00170-012-4558-510.1007/s00170-012-4558-5 ↗
2. 10.1109/ACCESS.2014.231181010.1109/ACCESS.2014.2311810 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.01210.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012 ↗
4. 10.1002/admt.20160001310.1002/admt.201600013 ↗
5. 10.1002/admt.20170007910.1002/admt.201700079 ↗
6. 10.1038/micronano.2015.1310.1038/micronano.2015.13 ↗
7. 10.1021/ja209267c10.1021/ja209267c ↗
8. 10.1063/1.496375510.1063/1.4963755 ↗
9. Chandrasekhar U. · Int. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. · 2011 · 3 · 188
10. 10.1002/adem.20080028410.1002/adem.200800284 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2005.12.10610.1016/j.apsusc.2005.12.106 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.497917310.1063/1.4979173 ↗
13. 10.1117/12.204422210.1117/12.2044222 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.cap.2018.06.00110.1016/j.cap.2018.06.001 ↗
15. 10.1109/TMTT.2018.284586210.1109/TMTT.2018.2845862 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.12410.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.124 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.01.00610.1016/j.addma.2018.01.006 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.mee.2017.12.01010.1016/j.mee.2017.12.010 ↗
19. 10.1002/admt.20180052910.1002/admt.201800529 ↗
20. 10.1007/s10853-015-9668-710.1007/s10853-015-9668-7 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.addma.2017.10.00210.1016/j.addma.2017.10.002 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.addma.2019.03.01610.1016/j.addma.2019.03.016 ↗
23. 10.1080/00202967.2002.1187143610.1080/00202967.2002.11871436 ↗
24. 10.1109/TAP.2004.82579910.1109/TAP.2004.825799 ↗
25. Lefebvre M. · Proc. IMPACT · 2010
26. 10.1149/2.0321901jes10.1149/2.0321901jes ↗
27. 10.1149/2.0131802jes10.1149/2.0131802jes ↗
28. Schmitz E. P. S. · Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. · 2016 · 11 · 98310.1016/S1452-3981(23)15899-8 ↗
29. 2014
30. nScrypt 3D Printing www.nscrypt.com/3d‐printing/(accessed: February2019).