Hybrid Microfluidic Chip Design with Two‐Photon Polymerized Protein‐Based Hydrogel Microstructures for Single Cell Experiments
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Although hydrogels are among the most promising materials for a huge variety of biomimicking and tissue engineering applications, conventional materials such as polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) still outweigh hydrogels in terms of processability for the production of microfluidic devices. Hence, incorporating hydrogel components inside conventional PDMS‐based microfluidic chips is a promising approach to take advantage of the many possibilities to utilize hydrogels, while maintaining standard properties of microfluidic devices in terms of mechanical stability. Microfluidic chips produced by standard soft lithography are combined with high‐resolution protein‐based hydrogel elements fabricated by two‐photon polymerization (2PP). Those hybrid chips are used to distinguish mechanical properties of different cell phenotypes by injecting pancreatic cancer cells inside the device and investigate mechanical interactions with the hydrogel microstructures. The Young's modulus of blocks printed at different experimental conditions is determined by atomic force microscopy measurements. To showcase the high 3D resolution of the presented fabrication method, fully 3D fibrous meshes are printed with different configurations inside microchannels. By measuring the velocity and circularity of pancreatic cancer cells that pass through meshes of varying densities, the impact on the cell flow is determined. Furthermore, the hydrogel precursor solution is successfully removed and the meshes are immersed in phosphate buffered saline.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nonlinear Optical Materials Studies · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
University of Münster Institute of Applied Physics Corrensstr. 2 48149 Münster Germany
University of Münster Institute of Physiology II Robert‐Koch‐Str. 27A 48149 Münster Germany
Physikalisch‐Technische Bundesanstalt Bundesallee 100 38116 Braunschweig Germany
Funding
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. D. K.Patel M. M.Espinal T. V.Patil K.Ganguly S. D.Dutta R.Luthfikasari K.‐T.Lim Microfluidics and Lab‐on‐a‐Chip for Biomedical Applications pp.263–283 Springer International Publishing ISBN 9783031160844 2022.10.1007/978-3-031-16084-4_11 ↗
2. 10.3390/mi1106059910.3390/mi11060599 ↗
3. 10.1038/micronano.2017.10410.1038/micronano.2017.104 ↗
4. 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b0498610.1021/acs.analchem.9b04986 ↗
5. 10.3390/biomimetics801007410.3390/biomimetics8010074 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.isci.2021.10209810.1016/j.isci.2021.102098 ↗
7. 10.1039/D3SM00208J10.1039/D3SM00208J ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b0159710.1021/acs.nanolett.9b01597 ↗
9. 10.3390/ma1505166410.3390/ma15051664 ↗
10. 10.1007/s10404-020-02413-810.1007/s10404-020-02413-8 ↗
11. 10.1038/3500704710.1038/35007047 ↗
12. 10.3390/mi1105047910.3390/mi11050479 ↗
13. 10.1039/b618463d10.1039/b618463d ↗
14. 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2019.10431410.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2019.104314 ↗
15. 10.1002/adhm.20190028910.1002/adhm.201900289 ↗
16. 10.1021/cr000108x10.1021/cr000108x ↗
17. 10.1039/C7BM00765E10.1039/C7BM00765E ↗
18. 10.3389/fchem.2018.0049910.3389/fchem.2018.00499 ↗
19. 10.1002/adhm.20190121710.1002/adhm.201901217 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsami.0c2157310.1021/acsami.0c21573 ↗
21. 10.1039/C6LC00247A10.1039/C6LC00247A ↗
22. 10.1039/C6LC00163G10.1039/C6LC00163G ↗
23. 10.1039/C6LC00284F10.1039/C6LC00284F ↗
24. 10.3390/ma1621698410.3390/ma16216984 ↗
25. 10.1088/1758-5090/ac2d7810.1088/1758-5090/ac2d78 ↗
26. 10.1039/D0LC00767F10.1039/D0LC00767F ↗
27. 10.1016/j.isci.2023.10637410.1016/j.isci.2023.106374 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2021.10718010.1016/j.optlastec.2021.107180 ↗
29. 10.1002/adfm.20221421110.1002/adfm.202214211 ↗
30. 10.1364/OL.22.00013210.1364/OL.22.000132 ↗
31. 10.1038/3508913010.1038/35089130 ↗
32. 10.1002/adfm.20221264110.1002/adfm.202212641 ↗
33. 10.1002/adfm.20221394710.1002/adfm.202213947 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.mee.2018.01.00710.1016/j.mee.2018.01.007 ↗
35. 10.1039/C9LC00759H10.1039/C9LC00759H ↗
36. 10.1088/1758-5090/abb06310.1088/1758-5090/abb063 ↗
37. 10.1002/admt.20230071810.1002/admt.202300718 ↗
38. 10.3389/fbioe.2021.66409410.3389/fbioe.2021.664094 ↗
39. 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.3c0085310.1021/acsmaterialslett.3c00853 ↗
40. 10.1007/BF0289043110.1007/BF02890431 ↗
41. L.Kastl B.Budde M.Isbach C.Rommel B.Kemper J.Schnekenburger Progr. Biomed. Opt. Imag. ‐ Proc. SPIE2015 9328n. pag.10.1117/12.2080151 ↗
42. 10.3390/jcm808119410.3390/jcm8081194 ↗
43. 10.3390/pharmaceutics1207060210.3390/pharmaceutics12070602 ↗
44. 10.3390/ijms16071599710.3390/ijms160715997 ↗
45. 10.1109/TBME.2009.203346410.1109/TBME.2009.2033464 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.05.01510.1016/j.medengphy.2011.05.015 ↗
47. 10.1152/physrev.00041.200810.1152/physrev.00041.2008 ↗
48. R. K. V. N. P. M. J.Joseph M. I.Shah M.Sivaprakasam 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA)2018 1.
49. 10.1002/adhm.20190075210.1002/adhm.201900752 ↗
50. 10.1021/acs.biomac.7b0090510.1021/acs.biomac.7b00905 ↗
51. 10.1088/2057-1976/aaafb710.1088/2057-1976/aaafb7 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.jmst.2023.04.01510.1016/j.jmst.2023.04.015 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.10165610.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101656 ↗
54. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b0059310.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00593 ↗
55. 10.1002/adma.20160434210.1002/adma.201604342 ↗
56. 10.1038/s41598-017-05383-010.1038/s41598-017-05383-0 ↗
57. 10.1007/s00424-008-0524-310.1007/s00424-008-0524-3 ↗