journal article·2023-01Open access

Improved Performance of Biohybrid Muscle‐Based Bio‐Bots Doped with Piezoelectric Boron Nitride Nanotubes

Rafael Mestre, Judith Fuentes, Laura Lefaix, Jiaojiao Wang, Maria Guix, Gonzalo Murillo, Rashid Bashir, Samuel Sánchez

Advanced Materials Technologies· Volume 8· Issue 2

Abstract

Abstract Biohybrid robots, or bio‐bots, integrate living and synthetic materials following a synergistic strategy to acquire some of the unique properties of biological organisms, like adaptability or bio‐sensing, which are difficult to obtain exclusively using artificial materials. Skeletal muscle is one of the preferred candidates to power bio‐bots, enabling a wide variety of movements from walking to swimming. Conductive nanocomposites, like gold nanoparticles or graphene, can provide benefits to muscle cells by improving the scaffolds’ mechanical and conductive properties. Here, boron nitride nanotubes (BNNTs), with piezoelectric properties, are integrated in muscle‐based bio‐bots and an improvement in their force output and motion speed is demonstrated. A full characterization of the BNNTs is provided, and their piezoelectric behavior with piezometer and dynamometer measurements is confirmed. It is hypothesized that the improved performance is a result of an electric field generated by the nanocomposites due to stresses produced by the cells during differentiation. This hypothesis is backed with finite element simulations supporting that this stress can generate a non‐zero electric field within the matrix. With this work, it is shown that the integration of nanocomposite into muscle‐based bio‐bots can improve their performance, paving the way toward stronger and faster bio‐hybrid robots.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Advanced Materials and Mechanics · Micro and Nano Robotics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC) Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST) Baldiri‐Reixac 10‐12 Barcelona 08028 Spain

School of Economic, Social and Political Sciences University of Southampton University Rd, Highfield Southampton SO17 1BJ UK

Instituto de Microelectrónica de Barcelona (IMB‐CNM, CSIC) Campus UAB, Bellaterra Barcelona 08193 Spain

Department of Bioengineering University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana IL 61820 USA

Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA) Passeig de Lluís Companys 23 Barcelona 08010 Spain

Funding

“la Caixa” Foundation · UK Research and Innovation · Generalitat de Catalunya · Agencia Estatal de Investigación · National Science Foundation · Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación · Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad · Economic and Social Research Council

References (80)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/C6LC90088G10.1039/C6LC90088G ↗
2. 10.1038/s41578-018-0022-y10.1038/s41578-018-0022-y ↗
3. 10.1007/s10544-012-9697-910.1007/s10544-012-9697-9 ↗
4. 10.1002/aisy.20210008610.1002/aisy.202100086 ↗
5. 10.1002/adfm.20210477010.1002/adfm.202104770 ↗
6. 10.1007/s43154-021-00054-510.1007/s43154-021-00054-5 ↗
7. 10.1038/s42256-020-00263-110.1038/s42256-020-00263-1 ↗
8. 10.1002/anie.20100646410.1002/anie.201006464 ↗
9. 10.1002/wnan.170310.1002/wnan.1703 ↗
10. 10.1126/scirobotics.aap928110.1126/scirobotics.aap9281 ↗
11. 10.1039/c2lc40338b10.1039/c2lc40338b ↗
12. 10.1038/nprot.2007.22910.1038/nprot.2007.229 ↗
13. 10.1007/s10544-009-9379-410.1007/s10544-009-9379-4 ↗
14. 10.1089/ten.tea.2011.034110.1089/ten.tea.2011.0341 ↗
15. 10.1299/jbse.5.24510.1299/jbse.5.245 ↗
16. 10.1089/ten.tea.2012.042110.1089/ten.tea.2012.0421 ↗
17. 10.1126/scirobotics.aat444010.1126/scirobotics.aat4440 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.512720410.1063/1.5127204 ↗
19. 10.1002/adhm.20170049610.1002/adhm.201700496 ↗
20. 10.1126/scirobotics.abe757710.1126/scirobotics.abe7577 ↗
21. 10.1126/science.aaf429210.1126/science.aaf4292 ↗
22. 10.1073/pnas.140157711110.1073/pnas.1401577111 ↗
23. 10.1073/pnas.151613911310.1073/pnas.1516139113 ↗
24. 10.1002/aisy.20200023710.1002/aisy.202000237 ↗
25. 10.1038/micronano.2017.1510.1038/micronano.2017.15 ↗
26. 10.1038/s41598-017-03723-810.1038/s41598-017-03723-8 ↗
27. 10.1089/ten.tea.2018.020210.1089/ten.tea.2018.0202 ↗
28. 10.1002/adfm.20180114510.1002/adfm.201801145 ↗
29. 10.1002/adhm.20190113710.1002/adhm.201901137 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.513447710.1063/1.5134477 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.512144010.1063/1.5121440 ↗
32. 10.1073/pnas.190705111610.1073/pnas.1907051116 ↗
33. 10.1038/nmat454410.1038/nmat4544 ↗
34. 10.1080/17452759.2015.109705410.1080/17452759.2015.1097054 ↗
35. 10.1002/bit.2516010.1002/bit.25160 ↗
36. 10.1038/nnano.2011.16010.1038/nnano.2011.160 ↗
37. 10.1002/adfm.20160535210.1002/adfm.201605352 ↗
38. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0820210.1021/acsnano.6b08202 ↗
39. 10.1039/c3ra46218h10.1039/c3ra46218h ↗
40. 10.3389/fbioe.2020.0038310.3389/fbioe.2020.00383 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.12.00510.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.12.005 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.07.06210.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.07.062 ↗
43. 10.1021/acssensors.1c0212510.1021/acssensors.1c02125 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.05.04910.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.05.049 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.07.01210.1016/j.nanoen.2018.07.012 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2007.03.00210.1016/j.yexcr.2007.03.002 ↗
47. 10.1002/admt.20180063110.1002/admt.201800631 ↗
48. 10.3390/ijms2301043210.3390/ijms23010432 ↗
49. 10.1002/adma.20160504810.1002/adma.201605048 ↗
50. 10.3390/nano907095210.3390/nano9070952 ↗
51. 10.1039/C8NR10384D10.1039/C8NR10384D ↗
52. Tiano A. L. · 2014 · 906006
53. 10.1021/nn503693h10.1021/nn503693h ↗
54. 10.2147/IJN.S2407310.2147/IJN.S24073 ↗
55. 10.1038/srep0427110.1038/srep04271 ↗
56. 10.2147/IJN.S987910.2147/IJN.S9879 ↗
57. 10.1371/journal.pone.007170710.1371/journal.pone.0071707 ↗
58. 10.1038/nprot.2016.18510.1038/nprot.2016.185 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.11.05210.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.11.052 ↗
60. 10.3390/nano810077710.3390/nano8100777 ↗
61. 10.1016/S1359-6462(01)00724-210.1016/S1359-6462(01)00724-2 ↗
62. 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.20541510.1103/PhysRevB.69.205415 ↗
63. 10.1209/0295-5075/28/5/00710.1209/0295-5075/28/5/007 ↗
64. Zhang J. · Nano Today · 2009 · 4 · 1258
65. 10.1088/1361-6528/aa765b10.1088/1361-6528/aa765b ↗
66. 10.1088/0022-3727/42/8/08540310.1088/0022-3727/42/8/085403 ↗
67. 10.1021/nl062540l10.1021/nl062540l ↗
68. 10.3390/nano1212206910.3390/nano12122069 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.11036210.1016/j.matdes.2021.110362 ↗
70. 10.1088/1748-605X/abf27d10.1088/1748-605X/abf27d ↗
71. 10.1007/s11671-008-9210-910.1007/s11671-008-9210-9 ↗
72. 10.4236/jbnb.2011.2405210.4236/jbnb.2011.24052 ↗
73. 10.1038/srep0085710.1038/srep00857 ↗
74. 10.1083/jcb.116.5.124310.1083/jcb.116.5.1243 ↗
75. 10.1038/srep0611210.1038/srep06112 ↗
76. R.Mestre T.Patiño M.Guix X.Barceló S.Sanchez “Design Optimization and Characterization of Bio‐Hybrid Actuators Based on 3D‐Bioprinted Skeletal Muscle Tissue ” in (Eds:U.Martinez‐Hernandez et al.) Biomimetic and Biohybrid Systems. Living Machines 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science2019 Vol.11556 pp.205–215 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24741-6_18.10.1007/978-3-030-24741-6_18 ↗
77. 10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.22210.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.222 ↗
78. 10.1038/s41699-018-0050-x10.1038/s41699-018-0050-x ↗
79. 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.24140510.1103/PhysRevB.68.241405 ↗
80. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.10.02410.1016/j.compscitech.2007.10.024 ↗