Design of Paired Pouch Motors for Robotic Applications
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The performance of soft linear actuators will determine the capabilities of future soft robots, and any actuator that can produce larger deformations and forces with a low weight and using lower pressures could potentially become ubiquitous in the field. In this work, the design of paired pouch motors that can produce a maximum contraction ratio of 41.9% and of 31% with a 10 kg payload is presented. The design of higher‐order pairings of pouch motors is demonstrated to produce even larger deformations, and this basic concept is also applied to serial pneumatic artificial muscles to produce a contraction ratio as high as 51.78%. This concept can be applied to other soft actuators that produce a lateral expansion to produce a longitudinal contraction. Paired pouch motors are also applied to a jointed soft robotic arm where a single pouch motor is sufficient to produce a joint deformation of 120° at a pressure of 100 kPa with a tip payload of 300 g. Paired pouch motors have a combination of characteristics including ease of manufacturing, low weight, and low cost paired with good actuation performance that could make it one of the leading actuator design in the field of soft robotics.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Soft Robotics and Applications · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Dielectric materials and actuators
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Mechanical Engineering Sungkyunkwan University Suwon 16419 South Korea
Department of Mechanical Engineering Myongji University Yongin 17058 South Korea
Funding
Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy · National Research Foundation of Korea · Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1073/pnas.111656410810.1073/pnas.1116564108 ↗
2. 10.1038/ncomms1092910.1038/ncomms10929 ↗
3. 10.1089/soro.2013.000910.1089/soro.2013.0009 ↗
4. 10.1002/adfm.20130367610.1002/adfm.201303676 ↗
5. 10.1126/science.aab163710.1126/science.aab1637 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.03.00210.1016/j.tibtech.2013.03.002 ↗
7. 10.1038/nature1454310.1038/nature14543 ↗
8. 10.1089/soro.2016.000810.1089/soro.2016.0008 ↗
9. 10.1038/s41467-017-00685-310.1038/s41467-017-00685-3 ↗
10. 10.1088/1361-665X/aa532310.1088/1361-665X/aa5323 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.sna.2017.10.01010.1016/j.sna.2017.10.010 ↗
12. Daerden F. · Eur. J. Mech. Environ. Eng. · 2002 · 47 · 11
13. 10.1109/70.48175310.1109/70.481753 ↗
14. 10.1109/37.83363810.1109/37.833638 ↗
15. Faudzi A. A. M. · 2012
16. Daerden F. · 2001
17. 10.1080/01691864.2012.68972210.1080/01691864.2012.689722 ↗
18. 10.1002/adfm.20110297810.1002/adfm.201102978 ↗
19. 10.1089/soro.2016.007910.1089/soro.2016.0079 ↗
20. Hawkes E. W. · 2016
21. 10.1002/adma.20150318810.1002/adma.201503188 ↗
22. 10.1002/admt.20160016410.1002/admt.201600164 ↗
23. 10.1073/pnas.171345011410.1073/pnas.1713450114 ↗
24. 10.1089/soro.2014.002310.1089/soro.2014.0023 ↗
25. Greer J. D. · 2017
26. Lee J.‐Y. · Front. Rob. AI · 2016 · 3 · 00063
27. 10.1088/1748-3190/10/3/03500310.1088/1748-3190/10/3/035003 ↗
28. Meng C. · Int. J. Adv. Rob. Syst. · 2017 · 14 · 1
29. 10.1126/scirobotics.aan635710.1126/scirobotics.aan6357 ↗
30. 10.1177/027836491558792510.1177/0278364915587925 ↗
31. 10.1088/1748-3190/aa839f10.1088/1748-3190/aa839f ↗
32. 10.1109/LRA.2017.273424710.1109/LRA.2017.2734247 ↗
33. 10.1109/MRA.2016.258059110.1109/MRA.2016.2580591 ↗
34. 10.1089/soro.2017.004410.1089/soro.2017.0044 ↗
35. Festo Inc. Fluidic Muscle DMSP/MAS https://www.festo.com/cat/en‐us_us/data/doc_enus/PDF/US/DMSP‐MAS_ENUS.PDF(accessed: November2018).
36. Shadow Robotics Shadow 30mm Air Muscle – Specifications http://www.shadowrobot.com/wp‐content/uploads/2012/11/datasheet_30mm_sam.pdf(accessed: November2018).