A High‐Resolution Thin‐Film Fingerprint Sensor Using a Printed Organic Photodetector
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Organic photodetectors (OPDs) have attracted much attention in recent years, due to their promise in large‐area light sensing applications. Here, high‐resolution slot‐die‐coated large‐area bulk heterojunction organic photodiode (OPD) arrays are reported. The OPD uses a novel electron transport layer, indium gallium zinc oxide in combination with a molybdenum oxide top‐electrode. Together, these effectively reduce dark current densities to very low levels of ≈10−7 mA cm−2 at −2 V. The OPDs show linear behavior in a wide range of light intensities and high detectivity values under reverse bias conditions. When coated on a 508 ppi TFT backplane, a high‐quality optical fingerprint scanner capable of imaging in reflection is realized. The optical and electrical properties of the fingerprint sensor are characterized and high‐resolution fingerprint images are obtained.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Conducting polymers and applications · Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Holst Centre High Tech Campus 31 5656 AE Eindhoven The Netherlands
Department of Applied Physics Eindhoven University of Technology 5600 MB Eindhoven The Netherlands
Funding
European Regional Development Fund · Provincie Noord-Brabant
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Jansen‐van Vuuren R. D. · Adv. Mater. · 2016 · 28 · 476610.1002/adma.201505405 ↗
2. Baeg K.‐J. · Adv. Mater. · 2013 · 25 · 426710.1002/adma.201204979 ↗
3. Han J.‐s. · J. Micromech. Microeng. · 2005 · 15 · 28210.1088/0960-1317/15/2/006 ↗
4. Lu Y. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2015 · 106 · 26350310.1063/1.4922915 ↗
5. Qiu L. · 2014
6. García de Arquer F. P. · Nat. Rev. · 2017 · 2 · 16100
7. Adrien P. · Flexible Printed Electron. · 2016 · 1 · 04300110.1088/2058-8585/1/4/043001 ↗
8. Gelinck G. · Org. Electron. · 2016 · 63 · 197
9. Biele M. · Adv. Mater. Technol. · 2019 · 4 · 180015810.1002/admt.201800158 ↗
10. Zalar P. · Adv. Electron. Mater. · 2018 · 4 · 170060110.1002/aelm.201700601 ↗
11. Liu X. · J. Mater. Chem. C · 2018 · 6 · 349910.1039/C7TC05042A ↗
12. Kronemeijer A. J. · SID Symp. Dig. Tech. Pap. · 2018 · 49 · 157710.1002/sdtp.12311 ↗
13. Nomura K. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 99 · 05350510.1063/1.3622121 ↗
14. Weijer P. · Org. Electron. · 2019 · 66 · 4310.1016/j.orgel.2018.12.003 ↗
15. Hylke A. · SID Symp. Dig. Tech. Pap. · 2018 · 49 · 49410.1002/sdtp.12609 ↗
16. National Institute of Standards and Technology NIST Special Publication 500‐2452000.
17. Libert J. M. · NIST · 2012 · 7781
18. Ng T. N. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 91 · 06350510.1063/1.2767981 ↗
19. Arora H. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2015 · 106 · 14330110.1063/1.4917235 ↗
20. Kielar M. · Sci. Rep. · 2016 · 6 · 3920110.1038/srep39201 ↗
21. Pierre A. · Adv. Mater. · 2015 · 27 · 641110.1002/adma.201502238 ↗
22. Burns P. · Proc. IS&T 2000 PICS Conf. · 2000 · 135
23. Weijer P. · Org. Electron. · 2017 · 44 · 9410.1016/j.orgel.2017.02.009 ↗
24. Zhang D. · IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. · 2011 · 60 · 86310.1109/TIM.2010.2062610 ↗