On the explicit evaluation of stress intensity factors in the hybrid boundary element method
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT The hybrid boundary element method, as based on the Hellinger‐Reissner potential for assumed singular stress fields, is suited for the explicit mathematical description of high gradients. In this paper, after an introductory overview of the method and an account of different attempts of application to fracture mechanics problems, one makes use of Westergaard complex functions for numerically handling general curved cracks, in which the exact gradient of the stress field at crack tip is considered, for any planar configurations. Modes I and II stress intensity factors are directly obtained as the primary unknowns of the problem, which eliminates the necessity of post‐processing results. Fairly good accuracy is achieved at low computational costs, as numerically assessed by means of several examples. The formulation seems to present no restrictions, for cases of both single and multiple internal cracks. At present, an extension to generally curved edge cracks as well as to kinked cracks is being investigated, as the method relies on the existence of analytical functions for the explicit description of local stress fields.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Numerical methods in engineering · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Dumont N. A. · 1987 · 117
2. 10.1115/1.315240810.1115/1.3152408 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0020-7683(00)00137-210.1016/S0020-7683(00)00137-2 ↗
4. Sensitivity analysis with the hybrid boundary element method
5. Lopes A. A. O.(1998)The hybrid boundary element method applied to fracture mechanics problems.MSc dissertation (in Portuguese) PUC‐Rio Brazil.
6. Dumont N. A.andLopes A. A. O.(1999)The hybrid boundary element method applied to linear fracture mechanics 15th Brazilian Congress of Mechanical Engineering – COBEM 99 Águas de Lindóia Brazil 10pp in CD.
7. Dumont N. A.andLopes A. A. O.(2000)On the evaluation of stress intensity factors in the hybrid boundary element method 14th Engineering Mechanics Conference (EM2000) of the American Society of Civil Engineers Austin EUA 6 pp in CD.
8. 10.1016/0955-7997(94)90030-210.1016/0955-7997(94)90030-2 ↗
9. Ariza M. P.andDominguez J.(2000)A single region be formulation for three‐dimensional dynamic fracture mechanics 14th Engineering Mechanics Conference (EM2000) of the American Society of Civil Engineers Austin EUA 6 pp in CD.
10. Lopes A. A. O.(2002)The hybrid boundary element method applied to fracture mechanics problems.PhD Thesis (in Portuguese) PUC‐Rio Brazil.
11. Ben‐Israel A. · 1980
12. 10.1016/S0020-7683(00)00140-210.1016/S0020-7683(00)00140-2 ↗
13. 10.1115/1.342308710.1115/1.3423087 ↗
14. 10.1007/978-3-642-48860-310.1007/978-3-642-48860-3 ↗
15. 10.1002/nme.162009030210.1002/nme.1620090302 ↗
16. 10.1002/nme.162010010310.1002/nme.1620100103 ↗
17. Improved quarter‐point crack tip element
18. Rooke D. P. · 1987
19. Anderson T. L. · 1995
20. 10.1115/1.316713010.1115/1.3167130 ↗
21. 10.1016/0020-7683(72)90082-010.1016/0020-7683(72)90082-0 ↗
22. 10.1002/nme.162038140610.1002/nme.1620381406 ↗
23. 10.1007/978-94-015-9793-7_3410.1007/978-94-015-9793-7_34 ↗
24. 10.1016/S0045-7825(97)00199-010.1016/S0045-7825(97)00199-0 ↗
25. 10.1115/1.401145410.1115/1.4011454 ↗
26. 10.1115/1.400891910.1115/1.4008919 ↗
27. Sneddon I. N. · 1957
28. Unger D. J. · 1995
29. 10.1016/0093-6413(79)90033-810.1016/0093-6413(79)90033-8 ↗
30. 10.1016/S0013-7944(97)00034-910.1016/S0013-7944(97)00034-9 ↗
31. Durand W. F. · 1934
32. Muskhelishvili N. I. · 1953
33. England A. H. · 1971
34. 10.1007/BF0003233810.1007/BF00032338 ↗