journal article·2018-02

A Novel Fold‐Based Design Approach toward Printable Soft Robotics Using Flexible 3D Printing Materials

Benjamin Ang Wee Keong, Raye Yeow Chen Hua

Advanced Materials Technologies· Volume 3· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Soft robotic technologies have been known to have various advantages over their rigid counterparts due to their compliant and deformable properties. They can carry out delicate object manipulation and perform complex maneuvers in confined spaces, which traditional robotics has difficulty with. The most widely adopted fabrication method for traditional soft elastomeric fluidic actuators is mold‐casting, which is cumbersome and involves several manual steps. Therefore, a substantial variability in performance and quality of these actuators arises directly from the manufacturing process. This paper presents on a novel fold‐based design of a 3D‐printed soft pneumatic bending actuator. In contrast to other works that rely on high‐end multimaterial 3D printers, a consumer‐grade open source 3D printer to fabricate soft pneumatic actuators in a fast and cheap way using fused deposition modeling technology has been adapted. This allows for consistency in both the quality of the actuators and their mechanical performance. The key findings in (1) a 3D‐printed fold‐based actuator fabrication process, (2) actuator characterization, and (3) a design‐centric approach toward different bending profiles for different applications are presented.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Soft Robotics and Applications · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Micro and Nano Robotics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Biomedical Engineering Faculty of Engineering National University of Singapore Block E4, #04‐08, 4 Engineering Drive 3 Singapore 117583 Singapore

Funding

MOE AcRF Tier 2 research

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. Hao Y. · 2016 · 6109
2. Homberg B. S. · 2015 · 1698
3. 10.1007/s11012-015-0261-610.1007/s11012-015-0261-6 ↗
4. Low J. H. · J. Vis. Exp. · 2016 · 114 · e54175
5. 10.1115/1.403261610.1115/1.4032616 ↗
6. Haghshenas‐Jaryani M. · 2016
7. Al‐Fahaam H. · 2016
8. 10.1007/s00170-015-7085-310.1007/s00170-015-7085-3 ↗
9. Cheney N. · 2015
10. 10.1109/MRA.2008.92797910.1109/MRA.2008.927979 ↗
11. 10.1115/1.403055410.1115/1.4030554 ↗
12. Wait K. W. · 2010
13. Onal C. D. · 2017 · 52510.1007/978-3-319-29363-9_30 ↗
14. 10.1073/pnas.111656410810.1073/pnas.1116564108 ↗
15. Hughes J. · Front. Rob. AI · 2016 · 3 · 1
16. 10.1016/j.robot.2014.08.01410.1016/j.robot.2014.08.014 ↗
17. 10.1088/1748-3182/9/1/01600710.1088/1748-3182/9/1/016007 ↗
18. 10.1109/TNSRE.2016.260294110.1109/TNSRE.2016.2602941 ↗
19. Nordin I. N. A. M. · 2015
20. 10.1002/anie.20100646410.1002/anie.201006464 ↗
21. Yap H. K. · 2016
22. 10.1089/soro.2016.003010.1089/soro.2016.0030 ↗