journal article·2020-03Open access

Stability of PEDOT:PSS‐Coated Gold Electrodes in Cell Culture Conditions

Gerwin Dijk, Alexandra L. Rutz, George G. Malliaras

Advanced Materials Technologies· Volume 5· Issue 3

Abstract

Abstract Poly(3,4‐ethylenedioxythiophene) doped with polystyrene sulfonate (PEDOT:PSS) is widely used as a coating on microelectrode arrays in order to reduce impedance for both in vitro and in vivo electrophysiology. In many applications, electrode performance of months to years is desired; yet, there are few studies to date that examine the long‐term stability of conducting polymers and their devices. Here, the stability of PEDOT:PSS microelectrodes is examined over a period of four months in cell culture media enriched with fetal bovine serum. The electrochemical impedance remains constant for most electrodes throughout the study, and only small changes in the structure of functional electrodes are observed. The results demonstrate that PEDOT:PSS electrodes show adequate stability for a variety of in vitro electrophysiology applications in toxicology, drug development, tissue engineering, and fundamental studies of electrically active cells and tissues.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Neuroscience and Neural Engineering · Conducting polymers and applications · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Bioelectronics, Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines CMP‐EMSE 13541 Gardanne France

Panaxium SAS 13100 Aix‐en‐Provence France

Electrical Engineering Division, Department of Engineering University of Cambridge 9 JJ Thomson Ave Cambridge CB3 0FA UK

Funding

Whitaker International Fellows and Scholars Program · European Commission

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nnano.2012.26510.1038/nnano.2012.265 ↗
2. 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.9310.1038/natrevmats.2016.93 ↗
3. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199910)11:14<1214::AID-ADMA1214>3.0.CO;2-310.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199910)11:14<1214::AID-ADMA1214>3.0.CO;2-3 ↗
4. 10.1002/1097-4636(200108)56:2<261::AID-JBM1094>3.0.CO;2-I10.1002/1097-4636(200108)56:2<261::AID-JBM1094>3.0.CO;2-I ↗
5. 10.1016/S0924-4247(01)00637-910.1016/S0924-4247(01)00637-9 ↗
6. 10.1002/adma.20180671210.1002/adma.201806712 ↗
7. 10.1002/celc.20150055510.1002/celc.201500555 ↗
8. 10.1038/nn.390510.1038/nn.3905 ↗
9. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b0014610.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00146 ↗
10. 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b0062410.1021/acs.accounts.7b00624 ↗
11. 10.3389/fnins.2016.0053710.3389/fnins.2016.00537 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0165-0270(01)00412-510.1016/S0165-0270(01)00412-5 ↗
13. 10.1088/1741-2560/12/1/01100110.1088/1741-2560/12/1/011001 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.09.01010.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.09.010 ↗
15. Stieglitz T. · Neuroethics · 2019
16. 10.1109/TNSRE.2011.210939910.1109/TNSRE.2011.2109399 ↗
17. Schander A. · 2016 · 6174
18. 10.1109/TNSRE.2007.90981110.1109/TNSRE.2007.909811 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsami.6b1346810.1021/acsami.6b13468 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.snb.2017.05.05710.1016/j.snb.2017.05.057 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.sna.2016.05.03410.1016/j.sna.2016.05.034 ↗
22. 10.1109/JSEN.2018.288083310.1109/JSEN.2018.2880833 ↗
23. 10.1002/adfm.20170023210.1002/adfm.201700232 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.09.08310.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.09.083 ↗
25. 10.1002/adhm.20160087010.1002/adhm.201600870 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.medengphy.2008.06.00110.1016/j.medengphy.2008.06.001 ↗
27. 10.1088/1741-2560/10/6/06601410.1088/1741-2560/10/6/066014 ↗
28. 10.3389/fnins.2018.0071510.3389/fnins.2018.00715 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.21410.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.214 ↗
30. 10.1109/TBME.2015.244571310.1109/TBME.2015.2445713 ↗
31. 10.1002/celc.20170029710.1002/celc.201700297 ↗
32. 10.1038/srep4033210.1038/srep40332 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.snb.2018.08.00710.1016/j.snb.2018.08.007 ↗
34. 10.1038/micronano.2017.2810.1038/micronano.2017.28 ↗
35. 10.1002/polb.2433110.1002/polb.24331 ↗
36. 10.1002/mame.20160049710.1002/mame.201600497 ↗