Buckling Pneumatic Linear Actuators Inspired by Muscle
Source abstract
Abstract
The mechanical features of biological muscles are difficult to reproduce completely in synthetic systems. A new class of soft pneumatic structures (vacuum-actuated muscle-inspired pneumatic structures) is described that combines actuation by negative pressure (vacuum), with cooperative buckling of beams fabricated in a slab of elastomer, to achieve motion and demonstrate many features that are similar to that of mammalian muscle. As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re-organized for online delivery, but are not copy-edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Advanced Materials and Mechanics · Soft Robotics and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology Harvard University 12 Oxford Street Cambridge MA 02138 USA
School of Engineering and Applied Sciences Harvard University 29 Oxford Street Cambridge MA 02138 USA
Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering Harvard University 60 Oxford Street Cambridge MA 02138 USA
Kavli Institute for Bionano Science & Technology Harvard University 29 Oxford Street Cambridge MA 02138 USA
Funding
Government of Canada
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nature1454310.1038/nature14543 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.cub.2013.04.07010.1016/j.cub.2013.04.070 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.03.00210.1016/j.tibtech.2013.03.002 ↗
4. Suzumori K. · Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Rob. Autom. · 1991
5. 10.1073/pnas.100325010710.1073/pnas.1003250107 ↗
6. 10.1002/ange.20100646410.1002/ange.201006464 ↗
7. 10.1002/adma.20120300210.1002/adma.201203002 ↗
8. 10.1002/adfm.20130328810.1002/adfm.201303288 ↗
9. 10.1007/978-1-4471-1501-410.1007/978-1-4471-1501-4 ↗
10. Spong M. W. · 2006
11. 10.1109/MRA.2007.33960410.1109/MRA.2007.339604 ↗
12. Bruzek R. · Proc. ASME Jt. Rail Conf. · 2013
13. Gordo J. · J. Ship Res. · 1996 · 40 · 6010.5957/jsr.1996.40.1.60 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.07.02510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.07.025 ↗
15. 10.1039/c0sm00374c10.1039/c0sm00374c ↗
16. 10.1002/polb.2359010.1002/polb.23590 ↗
17. 10.1088/0964-1726/24/6/06300110.1088/0964-1726/24/6/063001 ↗
18. 10.1126/science.118238310.1126/science.1182383 ↗
19. 10.1021/nn103523t10.1021/nn103523t ↗
20. 10.1073/pnas.111567410910.1073/pnas.1115674109 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.17550310.1103/PhysRevLett.113.175503 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.01430110.1103/PhysRevLett.113.014301 ↗
23. 10.1002/adma.20150280910.1002/adma.201502809 ↗
24. 10.1073/pnas.150494711210.1073/pnas.1504947112 ↗
25. 10.1002/adma.20150318810.1002/adma.201503188 ↗
26. Timoshenko S. · 1961
27. 10.1109/JOE.2004.83313510.1109/JOE.2004.833135 ↗
28. Daerden F. · Eur. J. Mech. Environ. Eng. · 2002 · 47 · 11
29. Klute G. K. · Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Adv. Intell. Mechatron. · 1999
30. 10.1109/70.48175310.1109/70.481753 ↗
31. 10.1126/science.109901010.1126/science.1099010 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.sna.2009.08.02710.1016/j.sna.2009.08.027 ↗
33. Pei Q. · Smart Struct. Mater. · 2003
34. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.08430110.1103/PhysRevLett.99.084301 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jmps.2008.03.00610.1016/j.jmps.2008.03.006 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.14810310.1103/PhysRevLett.87.148103 ↗
37. 10.1146/annurev.ph.55.030193.00252310.1146/annurev.ph.55.030193.002523 ↗
38. Ikai M. · Int. Z. Angew. Physiol. · 1970 · 28 · 173