Understanding Operando Water Management in Hydroxide‐Exchange‐Membrane Fuel Cells
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT The water balance in hydroxide‐exchange‐membrane fuel cells (HEMFCs) is a key challenge for improved performance and durability, intimately linked with the various interfaces and coupled phenomena. For every 4 electrons produced, 4 water molecules are generated in the anode and 2 consumed in the cathode, while electroosmosis transports water across the HEM from the cathode to the anode. Consequently, a concentration gradient drives water back, from anode to cathode. Ineffective water management could lead to cathode dry‐out, limiting reaction rate and causing ionomer degradation, or to anode flooding. To address these concerns, it is critical to measure the water transport operando . Herein, a home‐built water‐flux station is used to measure total water flux during cell operation with different inlet relative humidities and back pressures. Increasing the HEM thickness fourfold decreases the water flux at high current density, and utilizing microporous layers on both the anode and cathode decreases the water flux from the anode to the cathode. However, the most significant variable in changing the water flux was found by increasing the anode back pressure. Furthermore, humidity cycling significantly changed electrochemical performance without affecting the overall water fluxes. These findings can be translated to other devices utilizing an HEM.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Advanced battery technologies research · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Energy Conversion Group Energy Technologies Area Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley California USA
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering Center for Catalytic Science and Technology University of Delaware Newark Delaware USA
Funding
Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies Office · Advanced Research Projects Agency
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nnano.2016.26510.1038/nnano.2016.265 ↗
2. W. G.Gregory KleenandJ.Fornaciari DOE Hydrogen Program Record (2023).
3. B. D.James J. M.Huya‐Kouadio C.Houchins andD. A.DeSantis Mass Production Cost Estimation of Direct H2 PEM Fuel Cell Systems for Transportation Applications: 2018 Update (Strategic Analysis Inc. 2018).
4. U.S. Department of Energy (2017).
5. 10.1002/advs.20250101610.1002/advs.202501016 ↗
6. 10.1021/acs.accounts.3c0007110.1021/acs.accounts.3c00071 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41560‐023‐01385‐710.1038/s41560‐023‐01385‐7 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.12173310.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121733 ↗
9. 10.1038/s41563‐022‐01221‐510.1038/s41563‐022‐01221‐5 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.08.01010.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.08.010 ↗
11. 10.1002/aenm.20200198610.1002/aenm.202001986 ↗
12. 10.1149/1945‐7111/abf77f10.1149/1945‐7111/abf77f ↗
13. 10.1039/c8ee00122g10.1039/c8ee00122g ↗
14. 10.1149/07514.0949ecst10.1149/07514.0949ecst ↗
15. 10.1016/j.enconman.2022.11620310.1016/j.enconman.2022.116203 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.11768010.1016/j.memsci.2019.117680 ↗
17. 10.1149/1945‐7111/ad09f910.1149/1945‐7111/ad09f9 ↗
18. Roy A. · 2018
19. 10.1016/0013‐4686(94)00277‐810.1016/0013‐4686(94)00277‐8 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0095810.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00958 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.08.02610.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.08.026 ↗
22. 10.1039/D0EE01133A10.1039/D0EE01133A ↗
23. 10.1016/j.coelec.2018.03.01910.1016/j.coelec.2018.03.019 ↗
24. 10.1002/cssc.20140302210.1002/cssc.201403022 ↗
25. 10.1038/s41560‐019‐0372‐810.1038/s41560‐019‐0372‐8 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.11768010.1016/j.memsci.2019.117680 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.memsci.2023.12194510.1016/j.memsci.2023.121945 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.23249410.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.232494 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.12.18510.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.12.185 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.23234310.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.232343 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.elecom.2008.12.05310.1016/j.elecom.2008.12.053 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.05.04610.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.05.046 ↗
33. 10.1002/er.426210.1002/er.4262 ↗
34. 10.1149/08613.0015ecst10.1149/08613.0015ecst ↗
35. 10.1149/1.163915710.1149/1.1639157 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.11846110.1016/j.memsci.2020.118461 ↗
37. 10.1149/1945‐7111/abf06110.1149/1945‐7111/abf061 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.electacta.2025.14732210.1016/j.electacta.2025.147322 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.23151410.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.231514 ↗
40. 10.1149/1.235203910.1149/1.2352039 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.03.23810.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.03.238 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.04.05210.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.04.052 ↗
43. 10.1149/1.186119410.1149/1.1861194 ↗
44. 10.1149/1945‐7111/ac644610.1149/1945‐7111/ac6446 ↗
45. 10.1039/c9se01143a10.1039/c9se01143a ↗
46. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b0015910.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00159 ↗
47. 10.1149/1.311692210.1149/1.3116922 ↗
48. 10.1021/jp206154y10.1021/jp206154y ↗
49. 10.1149/1.324087710.1149/1.3240877 ↗
50. 10.1149/1.348156110.1149/1.3481561 ↗
51. 10.1007/BF0024158210.1007/BF00241582 ↗
52. 10.1115/1.400239810.1115/1.4002398 ↗
53. 10.1149/2.009303eel10.1149/2.009303eel ↗
54. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.02.02010.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.02.020 ↗
55. 10.1039/D0TA05807F10.1039/D0TA05807F ↗
56. 10.1002/fuce.20130021510.1002/fuce.201300215 ↗