journal article·2026-04Open access

From Copper Nanoparticles to Alumina Encapsulated Porous Layers With Enhanced Mechanical Stability

Dominik Gutnik, Daniele Casari, Laszlo Pethö, Michael Burtscher, Anna M. Hofer‐Roblyek, Christian Mitterer, Barbara Putz

Advanced Materials Interfaces· Volume 13· Issue 7

Abstract

ABSTRACT Nanoparticle‐based structures are of significance for emerging technologies from antimicrobial coatings to catalysts. Sputtering based fabrication routes are particularly promising whenever high purity and monodisperse particles are required. This work establishes quantitative synthesis‐structure relations for Cu‐nanoparticles (diameter < 10 nm), synthesized through magnetron sputtering inert gas condensation and high‐power impulse hollow cathode sputtering. The two deposition methods are compared in terms of nanoparticle deposition rate, morphology and size distribution. While magnetron sputtering inert gas condensation with quadrupole mass spectrometry offers excellent control of the size distribution of single‐crystal particles, high‐power impulse hollow cathode sputtering enables deposition of polycrystalline nanoparticles at higher deposition rates with more efficient target utilization. Consequently, porous, randomly assembled nanoparticle‐based films of up to 1.5 µm thickness have been fabricated. Stabilization of these structures via atomic layer deposition (ALD‐Al 2 O 3 , thickness up to 20 nm) is demonstrated through electron microscopy and nanoscratching, linking nanoscale structure to macroscale mechanical performance. While ALD encapsulation at 120°C does not change the Cu microstructure, the scratch resistance of the films improves with increasing encapsulation layer thickness. These findings provide a direct pathway from fundamental surface engineering to thick and robust functional nanoparticle‐based films for future bio‐medical and energy applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Anodic Oxide Films and Nanostructures · Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics · Nanoporous metals and alloys

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Science Montanuniversität Leoben Leoben Austria

Laboratory For Mechanics of Materials and Nanostructures, Empa Swiss Federal Laboratories For Materials Science and Technology Thun Switzerland

Funding

Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft · Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung

References (94)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.mattod.2015.08.02210.1016/j.mattod.2015.08.022 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.cis.2023.10300710.1016/j.cis.2023.103007 ↗
3. 10.1021/acsanm.1c0077910.1021/acsanm.1c00779 ↗
4. 10.1109/TCPMT.2023.327832010.1109/TCPMT.2023.3278320 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.10.08010.1016/j.jmrt.2023.10.080 ↗
6. 10.1002/advs.20220354410.1002/advs.202203544 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.tsf.2023.13982210.1016/j.tsf.2023.139822 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.05.03210.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.05.032 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2023.11258610.1016/j.vacuum.2023.112586 ↗
10. 10.1116/6.000432810.1116/6.0004328 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.carbon.2020.08.06110.1016/j.carbon.2020.08.061 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.04.08710.1016/j.matdes.2018.04.087 ↗
13. 10.1002/aenm.20220171310.1002/aenm.202201713 ↗
14. 10.1038/s41578-021-00356-210.1038/s41578-021-00356-2 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.11880010.1016/j.apcatb.2020.118800 ↗
16. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b0070510.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00705 ↗
17. 10.1155/2021/510201410.1155/2021/5102014 ↗
18. 10.1007/s43939-022-00022-610.1007/s43939-022-00022-6 ↗
19. 10.3390/su15141089110.3390/su151410891 ↗
20. 10.3762/bjnano.11.8610.3762/bjnano.11.86 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2018.08.01110.1016/j.radphyschem.2018.08.011 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.envres.2021.11162210.1016/j.envres.2021.111622 ↗
23. 10.3390/nano1402016410.3390/nano14020164 ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c0291710.1021/acs.nanolett.3c02917 ↗
25. 10.3390/nano1110248410.3390/nano11102484 ↗
26. 10.1038/s42004-021-00582-310.1038/s42004-021-00582-3 ↗
27. 10.1039/D1CP00701G10.1039/D1CP00701G ↗
28. 10.3390/cryst1302025310.3390/cryst13020253 ↗
29. 10.1002/anie.20130919310.1002/anie.201309193 ↗
30. 10.1007/BF0154402510.1007/BF01544025 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2023.13004510.1016/j.surfcoat.2023.130045 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2025.13189210.1016/j.surfcoat.2025.131892 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2023.13032510.1016/j.surfcoat.2023.130325 ↗
34. 10.1557/mrc.2018.16910.1557/mrc.2018.169 ↗
35. Huszar E. · 2023
36. 10.1002/ppap.20190007910.1002/ppap.201900079 ↗
37. 10.1002/ppsc.20190043610.1002/ppsc.201900436 ↗
38. 10.1116/6.000328310.1116/6.0003283 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2024.11372410.1016/j.vacuum.2024.113724 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.10.01210.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.10.012 ↗
41. 10.1002/ppsc.20240003810.1002/ppsc.202400038 ↗
42. 10.1002/ppap.20210006810.1002/ppap.202100068 ↗
43. 10.1039/D5NR02126J10.1039/D5NR02126J ↗
44. 10.1088/0963-0252/22/3/03500610.1088/0963-0252/22/3/035006 ↗
45. 10.1088/0031-8949/45/5/01310.1088/0031-8949/45/5/013 ↗
46. 10.1063/1.482888310.1063/1.4828883 ↗
47. 10.1063/1.478873910.1063/1.4788739 ↗
48. 10.1063/1.495999310.1063/1.4959993 ↗
49. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0071810.1021/acs.nanolett.8b00718 ↗
50. 10.1007/s11051-019-4661-810.1007/s11051-019-4661-8 ↗
51. Ekeroth S. · 2019
52. 10.1021/jacs.8b1123710.1021/jacs.8b11237 ↗
53. 10.1002/adma.20230628810.1002/adma.202306288 ↗
54. 10.1039/c2nr32016a10.1039/c2nr32016a ↗
55. 10.1016/j.scib.2020.01.01610.1016/j.scib.2020.01.016 ↗
56. 10.1021/am200957910.1021/am2009579 ↗
57. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c0316410.1021/acs.chemmater.1c03164 ↗
58. 10.1021/nn201167j10.1021/nn201167j ↗
59. 10.1021/am100455q10.1021/am100455q ↗
60. 10.1021/la703074r10.1021/la703074r ↗
61. 10.1016/j.tsf.2020.13828710.1016/j.tsf.2020.138287 ↗
62. 10.1039/D3NR01185B10.1039/D3NR01185B ↗
63. 10.1016/j.jcat.2014.12.01210.1016/j.jcat.2014.12.012 ↗
64. 10.3390/applnano302000710.3390/applnano3020007 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.04.04310.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.04.043 ↗
66. 10.1103/PhysRevB.19.502810.1103/PhysRevB.19.5028 ↗
67. 10.1021/acsanm.0c0073610.1021/acsanm.0c00736 ↗
68. 10.1038/s41467-023-43103-710.1038/s41467-023-43103-7 ↗
69. 10.1007/s11051-019-4479-410.1007/s11051-019-4479-4 ↗
70. 10.1088/1361-6463/ad7a8210.1088/1361-6463/ad7a82 ↗
71. 10.1039/D2NA00121G10.1039/D2NA00121G ↗
72. 10.1016/j.apsadv.2024.10068910.1016/j.apsadv.2024.100689 ↗
73. 10.1063/1.493820910.1063/1.4938209 ↗
74. 10.1016/S0040-6090(02)00438-810.1016/S0040-6090(02)00438-8 ↗
75. 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.11543510.1103/PhysRevB.96.115435 ↗
76. 10.1002/ppsc.20230010210.1002/ppsc.202300102 ↗
77. 10.1021/acsami.2c0026310.1021/acsami.2c00263 ↗
78. 10.1039/D0NR01407A10.1039/D0NR01407A ↗
79. 10.1016/j.matchar.2015.09.00910.1016/j.matchar.2015.09.009 ↗
80. 10.1016/j.corsci.2016.01.02110.1016/j.corsci.2016.01.021 ↗
81. 10.1002/sia.728210.1002/sia.7282 ↗
82. 10.3390/coatings1110126610.3390/coatings11101266 ↗
83. 10.1149/1.330166410.1149/1.3301664 ↗
84. 10.1515/ntrev-2019-005510.1515/ntrev-2019-0055 ↗
85. J.TomastikandR.Ctvrtlik “Nanoscratch Test — A Tool for Evaluation of Cohesive and Adhesive Properties of Thin Films and Coatings ” inEPJ Web of Conferences(2013) 00027.10.1051/epjconf/20134800027 ↗
86. 10.1016/j.actamat.2022.11834510.1016/j.actamat.2022.118345 ↗
87. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2025.11666210.1016/j.scriptamat.2025.116662 ↗
88. 10.1002/adem.20220095110.1002/adem.202200951 ↗
89. 10.1016/j.matdes.2023.11208110.1016/j.matdes.2023.112081 ↗
90. 10.1016/j.actamat.2025.12109210.1016/j.actamat.2025.121092 ↗
91. 10.3390/cryst1104035710.3390/cryst11040357 ↗
92. Image Processing With imageJ
93. 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-210.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 ↗
94. 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-210.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 ↗