Interfacial Behavior of Methane in Methane/ p ‐Xylene/Water Systems: First Principles Inspected Using Neutron Imaging and Molecular Dynamics Simulations
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT Pressurized gases adsorb on the gas‐liquid ( g ‐ l ) interfaces, thus reducing the interfacial tension (IFT). Gas‐saturated liquid–liquid ( l ‐ l ) emulsions occur in oil and gas wells, possible IFT changes due to saturation remain unclear. We study if the IFT reduction occurs for the model system of methane, p‐ xylene, and water. The neutron imaging (NI) observations of bulk ( g ‐ l ‐ l ) systems at 100 bar provide several quantities simultaneously from each experimental run, e.g., IFT for g ‐ l and methane diffusivity for the p‐ xylene rich phase, but does not sensitively provide IFT for the l ‐ l interface. The quantities derived for the p‐ xylene‐rich phase using NI allows us to calibrate molecular dynamics (MD) simulation, which is used for the predictions of IFT for l ‐ l , literature data for binary benzene/water ( l ‐ l ) system are used as the reference. Overall, no, or very minor effect (±1 mN m − 1 ) on IFT is robustly found up to methane saturation at 100 bar. Variation of partial charges on the p ‐xylene model from zero to quantum calculation‐based modulate the fine structure of p ‐xylene/water interface and has small, yet qualitative effect on IFT, resulting in a weak adsorption (−1 mN m −1 ), or weak depletion (+1 mN m −1 ) of methane from l‐l .
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nuclear Physics and Applications · Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis · NMR spectroscopy and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physical Chemistry University of Chemistry and Technology Prague Czech Republic
PSI Center for Neutron and Muon Sciences, Paul Scherrer Institute Villigen PSI Switzerland
PSI Center for Energy and Environmental Sciences, Paul Scherrer Institute Villigen PSI Switzerland
References (60)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.10.01310.1016/j.jcis.2016.10.013 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.07.06910.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.07.069 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.petrol.2015.10.00610.1016/j.petrol.2015.10.006 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0920‐4105(03)00020‐210.1016/S0920‐4105(03)00020‐2 ↗
5. 10.1016/0016‐7037(95)00138‐710.1016/0016‐7037(95)00138‐7 ↗
6. 10.1021/la960974y10.1021/la960974y ↗
7. 10.1016/j.cocis.2016.09.00310.1016/j.cocis.2016.09.003 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.cocis.2004.05.00410.1016/j.cocis.2004.05.004 ↗
9. 10.1021/jp026744b10.1021/jp026744b ↗
10. 10.1021/jp960758y10.1021/jp960758y ↗
11. 10.1021/jp201239610.1021/jp2012396 ↗
12. 10.1021/ma052295c10.1021/ma052295c ↗
13. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.03.02610.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.03.026 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.05.08310.1016/j.jcis.2018.05.083 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c0262610.1021/acs.langmuir.1c02626 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.06.02410.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.06.024 ↗
17. 10.1021/la991146i10.1021/la991146i ↗
18. 10.1306/83D922A8‐16C7‐11D7‐8645000102C1865D10.1306/83D922A8‐16C7‐11D7‐8645000102C1865D ↗
19. 10.1007/BF0089375210.1007/BF00893752 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2019.03.01010.1016/j.expthermflusci.2019.03.010 ↗
21. 10.1016/S1003‐9953(10)60218‐610.1016/S1003‐9953(10)60218‐6 ↗
22. 10.1016/0927‐7757(94)03008‐110.1016/0927‐7757(94)03008‐1 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.12972510.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.129725 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.09.04010.1016/j.fuel.2018.09.040 ↗
25. 10.1038/s41598‐024‐85093‐610.1038/s41598‐024‐85093‐6 ↗
26. O.Vopička T.‐M.Durďáková P.Číhal et al. “Shapes of Mobile Interfaces in Tubes Revealed by Neutron Imaging: Sensitivity Analysis for Three‐phase High‐pressure Systems from Methane p‐Xylene and Water ” in: "Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Neutron Radiography" A.E. Craft and H.Z. Bilheux (Eds.) Springer Nature Proceedings 348(2026):1–7 https://doi.org/10.1007/978‐3‐032‐15003‐5_6.
27. 10.1038/s41598‐022‐27142‐610.1038/s41598‐022‐27142‐6 ↗
28. 10.1002/978047172219910.1002/9780471722199 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.172403310.1063/1.1724033 ↗
30. 10.1515/zpch‐1908‐642510.1515/zpch‐1908‐6425 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jct.2016.03.03810.1016/j.jct.2016.03.038 ↗
32. 10.1021/j100727a02910.1021/j100727a029 ↗
33. 10.1021/je025602810.1021/je0256028 ↗
34. 10.5958/2231‐5713.2019.00006.010.5958/2231‐5713.2019.00006.0 ↗
35. Young T. F. · 1928
36. 10.1039/DC978660019910.1039/DC9786600199 ↗
37. 10.1016/0009‐2509(66)85096‐010.1016/0009‐2509(66)85096‐0 ↗
38. 10.1063/1.146182910.1063/1.1461829 ↗
39. 10.1021/je900643r10.1021/je900643r ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jct.2009.04.00110.1016/j.jct.2009.04.001 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jct.2008.12.01010.1016/j.jct.2008.12.010 ↗
42. 10.1063/1.55581710.1063/1.555817 ↗
43. 10.1021/jp207499s10.1021/jp207499s ↗
44. 10.1560/WW15‐PBEW‐M3W4‐UAGN10.1560/WW15‐PBEW‐M3W4‐UAGN ↗
45. 10.1039/D3CP06170A10.1039/D3CP06170A ↗
46. 10.1016/S0021‐9673(02)00171‐110.1016/S0021‐9673(02)00171‐1 ↗
47. 10.1016/0021‐9797(67)90257‐310.1016/0021‐9797(67)90257‐3 ↗
48. 10.1371/journal.pone.023847010.1371/journal.pone.0238470 ↗
49. 10.1080/1058975010895307510.1080/10589750108953075 ↗
50. 10.1103/PhysRev.48.26510.1103/PhysRev.48.265 ↗
51. 10.1364/AO.31.00114610.1364/AO.31.001146 ↗
52. 10.1063/1.212168710.1063/1.2121687 ↗
53. 10.1093/nar/gkx31210.1093/nar/gkx312 ↗
54. 10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b0027210.1021/acs.jpcb.7b00272 ↗
55. 10.1073/pnas.040803710210.1073/pnas.0408037102 ↗
56. 10.1063/1.46439710.1063/1.464397 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.softx.2015.06.00110.1016/j.softx.2015.06.001 ↗
58. 10.1002/jcc.2122410.1002/jcc.21224 ↗
59. 10.1063/1.240842010.1063/1.2408420 ↗
60. 10.1063/5.002051410.1063/5.0020514 ↗