Influence of Heat Treatments on the Photocatalytic Activity of TiO2 Surfaces Produced by Direct Laser Interference Patterning
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Direct laser interference patterning (DLIP) has in previous work shown to be an effective tool for producing photocatalytic surfaces in a single relatively simple processing step. These surfaces can be interesting candidates for antifouling or self‐cleaning surfaces, as well as substrates for photocatalytic water treatment. In this contribution, various heat treatments are performed both during and after the laser processing to create surfaces with even higher photocatalytic activities and to better understand the formation of various process oxides and their effect on the resulting activity. The photocatalytic activity of the samples is measured by methylene blue degradation and correlated to their chemical composition and morphology. Furthermore, a small prototype is built using low‐cost materials to prove the scalability of the approach.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Laser-Ablation Synthesis of Nanoparticles · Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Functional Materials Saarland University 66123 Saarbrücken Germany
Inorganic Solid‐State Chemistry Saarland University Campus, Building C4 1 66123 Saarbrücken Germany
Funding
European Regional Development Fund · Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.surfin.2021.10130410.1016/j.surfin.2021.101304 ↗
2. 10.1007/s10971-021-05628-510.1007/s10971-021-05628-5 ↗
3. 10.1246/bcsj.2020017510.1246/bcsj.20200175 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.mtchem.2021.10042810.1016/j.mtchem.2021.100428 ↗
5. 10.1088/2632-959X/abe84410.1088/2632-959X/abe844 ↗
6. 10.2351/7.000031610.2351/7.0000316 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsomega.0c0167110.1021/acsomega.0c01671 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2020.10689810.1016/j.optlastec.2020.106898 ↗
9. 10.3390/nano1314203210.3390/nano13142032 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.tsf.2015.10.06910.1016/j.tsf.2015.10.069 ↗
11. 10.3390/photonics1103028410.3390/photonics11030284 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41598-024-70103-410.1038/s41598-024-70103-4 ↗
13. 10.1002/cnma.20230031410.1002/cnma.202300314 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.09.09310.1016/j.apsusc.2016.09.093 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0021-9797(03)00755-010.1016/S0021-9797(03)00755-0 ↗
16. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b0028510.1021/acs.jpclett.7b00285 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsami.0c1002610.1021/acsami.0c10026 ↗
18. 10.1002/adem.20190063910.1002/adem.201900639 ↗
19. 10.1038/s41598-020-60592-410.1038/s41598-020-60592-4 ↗
20. 10.1002/adem.20240043510.1002/adem.202400435 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jcis.2024.04.21210.1016/j.jcis.2024.04.212 ↗
22. 10.1039/C5CY00879D10.1039/C5CY00879D ↗
23. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.07.08110.1016/j.apsusc.2016.07.081 ↗
24. 10.3891/acta.chem.scand.11-164110.3891/acta.chem.scand.11-1641 ↗
25. 10.1007/s11669-011-9935-510.1007/s11669-011-9935-5 ↗
26. 10.2138/am.2009.305010.2138/am.2009.3050 ↗
27. 10.1021/jp905163j10.1021/jp905163j ↗
28. 10.1007/s10853-010-5113-010.1007/s10853-010-5113-0 ↗
29. 10.1016/S0022-0248(02)01438-010.1016/S0022-0248(02)01438-0 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2009.08.00810.1016/j.surfcoat.2009.08.008 ↗
31. 10.1038/srep3176910.1038/srep31769 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2015.08.00310.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2015.08.003 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.23810.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.238 ↗
34. 10.1088/1757-899X/377/1/01210110.1088/1757-899X/377/1/012101 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jece.2022.10772210.1016/j.jece.2022.107722 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.apcata.2005.10.04110.1016/j.apcata.2005.10.041 ↗
37. 10.3390/nano1314212510.3390/nano13142125 ↗
38. 10.3390/catal1111137910.3390/catal11111379 ↗
39. 10.1039/D4SE00390J10.1039/D4SE00390J ↗
40. 10.1002/adem.20220102110.1002/adem.202201021 ↗
41. 10.1107/S0365110X6700023410.1107/S0365110X67000234 ↗
42. 10.1107/S002188986900655810.1107/S0021889869006558 ↗
43. Topas Version 5 Bruker AXS Inc Karlsruhe Germany2014.
44. Villars P. · 2023