journal article·2025-04Open access

Facile Tensile Testing Platform for In Situ Transmission Electron Microscopy of Nanomaterials

Bengisu Sari, Medha Dandu, Nathan Wood, Jacob Hochhalter, Amalya C. Johnson, Marca Doeff, Fang Liu, Archana Raja, Mary Scott, Rohan Dhall, Roseanne Warren

Advanced Materials Interfaces· Volume 12· Issue 7

Abstract

Abstract In situ tensile testing using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is a powerful technique to probe structure‐property relationships of materials at the atomic scale. In this work, a facile tensile testing platform for in situ characterization of materials inside a transmission electron microscope is demonstrated. The platform consists of: 1) a commercially available, flexible, electron‐transparent substrate (e.g., TEM grid) integrated with a conventional tensile testing holder, and 2) a finite element simulation providing quantification of specimen‐applied strain. The flexible substrate (carbon support film of the TEM grid) mitigates strain concentrations usually found in free‐standing films and enables in situ straining experiments to be performed on materials that cannot undergo localized thinning or focused ion beam lift‐out. The finite element simulation enables direct correlation of holder displacement with sample strain, providing upper and lower bounds of expected strain across the substrate. The tensile testing platform is validated for three disparate material systems: sputtered gold‐palladium, few‐layer transferred tungsten disulfide, and electrodeposited lithium, by measuring lattice strain from experimentally recorded electron diffraction data. The results show good agreement between experiment and simulation, providing confidence in the ability to transfer strain from holder to sample and relate TEM crystal structural observations with material mechanical properties.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques · Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Anodic Oxide Films and Nanostructures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Molecular Foundry Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 1 Cyclotron Rd Berkeley CA 94720 USA

Department of Materials Science and Engineering University of California Berkeley CA 94720 USA

Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Utah Salt Lake City UT 84112 USA

Department of Materials Science and Engineering Stanford University Stanford CA 94305 USA

Energy Storage and Distributed Resources Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley CA 94720 USA

Department of Chemistry Stanford University Stanford CA 94305 USA

Kavli Energy NanoScience Institute University of California Berkeley Berkeley CA 94720 USA

Funding

Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency · TomKat Center for Sustainable Energy, Stanford University

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/978-94-007-4342-710.1007/978-94-007-4342-7 ↗
2. 10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00300-710.1016/S1359-6454(01)00300-7 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2017.11.00410.1016/j.ultramic.2017.11.004 ↗
4. 10.1098/rspa.1960.006410.1098/rspa.1960.0064 ↗
5. 10.1016/0304-3991(76)90036-X10.1016/0304-3991(76)90036-X ↗
6. 10.1557/mrs.2014.410.1557/mrs.2014.4 ↗
7. 10.1002/admi.20170124610.1002/admi.201701246 ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c0051010.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00510 ↗
9. 10.1557/JMR.2005.022010.1557/JMR.2005.0220 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.04.01810.1016/j.carbon.2013.04.018 ↗
11. 10.1088/0957-4484/20/36/36570610.1088/0957-4484/20/36/365706 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.01.04310.1016/j.actamat.2012.01.043 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01807-X10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01807-X ↗
14. 10.1038/s41467-019-14130-010.1038/s41467-019-14130-0 ↗
15. 10.1021/nl201890s10.1021/nl201890s ↗
16. 10.1126/sciadv.150167110.1126/sciadv.1501671 ↗
17. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b0234910.1021/acs.jpclett.8b02349 ↗
18. 10.1093/jmicro/dfv02110.1093/jmicro/dfv021 ↗
19. 10.1093/jmicro/dfy02710.1093/jmicro/dfy027 ↗
20. 10.1093/jmicro/dfad04510.1093/jmicro/dfad045 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.11018010.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110180 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.msea.2017.06.10710.1016/j.msea.2017.06.107 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.11.00510.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.11.005 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jmst.2020.08.05810.1016/j.jmst.2020.08.058 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.07550210.1103/PhysRevLett.122.075502 ↗
26. Xiang Y. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 87 · 16
27. 10.1016/j.mseb.2010.02.02310.1016/j.mseb.2010.02.023 ↗
28. 10.1088/0953-8984/27/31/31320110.1088/0953-8984/27/31/313201 ↗
29. 10.1039/C9NR03332G10.1039/C9NR03332G ↗
30. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2004.02.00210.1016/j.mechmat.2004.02.002 ↗
31. Lu N. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 91 · 22
32. 10.1039/c3nr34216f10.1039/c3nr34216f ↗
33. 10.1126/science.aaz755510.1126/science.aaz7555 ↗
34. 10.1017/S143192762100047710.1017/S1431927621000477 ↗
35. 10.1063/1.482915410.1063/1.4829154 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.micron.2015.09.00110.1016/j.micron.2015.09.001 ↗
37. 10.1021/acsami.1c2343110.1021/acsami.1c23431 ↗
38. 10.1021/nl401474810.1021/nl4014748 ↗
39. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c0234610.1021/acs.nanolett.0c02346 ↗
40. 10.1038/s41699-023-00393-110.1038/s41699-023-00393-1 ↗
41. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0238110.1021/acsenergylett.8b02381 ↗
42. 10.1021/jacs.1c1321310.1021/jacs.1c13213 ↗
43. 10.1021/acsnano.0c0334410.1021/acsnano.0c03344 ↗
44. 10.1126/science.aba141610.1126/science.aba1416 ↗
45. 10.1021/acsnano.0c0386310.1021/acsnano.0c03863 ↗
46. 10.1088/2053-1583/abf23410.1088/2053-1583/abf234 ↗
47. 10.1021/nn505767310.1021/nn5057673 ↗