Durable Metallization of Resin Surfaces via Sacrificial Nanotransfer Lithography
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract By combining sacrificial nanoimprint lithography (SNIL) and transfer printing, sacrificial nanotransfer (SNT) lithography can create metalized polymer surfaces that enable lightweight conductive surface composites. SNT begins with a metal mold made from a high surface finish metal possessing high resistance to intermetallic alloying. A thin metallic transfer layer is then electroplated onto the mold by selecting a material unlikely to alloy with the surface. The selected nanomaterial, zinc oxide (ZnO), is grown on the top layer of the plated metallic transfer layer via a seedless hydrothermal approach used to synthesize high‐quality ZnO nanowire arrays. A resin material or laminate is cured in contact with the ZnO nanostructures, such that the ZnO nanorods are embedded onto the top layer of the resin. The embedded nanomaterials provide a larger surface area than the weak transfer layer‐mold interface. As a result, when the final component is removed from the mold, the metallic multilayer is transferred with it. The final metalized polymeric surface resembles the same surface finish as the starting mold, with an exposed metal layer and a durable interface. In this study, the importance of nanomaterial morphology and the selection of metal layers are explored to obtain high‐quality final transfers.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques · Copper Interconnects and Reliability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Rutgers University‐New Brunswick Piscataway NJ 08854 USA
Department of Materials Science and Engineering Rutgers University‐New Brunswick Piscataway NJ 08854 USA
Funding
New Jersey Space Grant Consortium · Office of Naval Research · Boeing
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/09506608.2021.195480510.1080/09506608.2021.1954805 ↗
2. 10.1021/acsaelm.3c0089310.1021/acsaelm.3c00893 ↗
3. 10.1080/02670844.2016.127784310.1080/02670844.2016.1277843 ↗
4. 10.1021/acsami.9b0185610.1021/acsami.9b01856 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.02.08710.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.02.087 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11095810.1016/j.matdes.2022.110958 ↗
7. 10.3390/app1015515310.3390/app10155153 ↗
8. 10.1088/1361-6595/ac7f5310.1088/1361-6595/ac7f53 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.14459610.1016/j.apsusc.2019.144596 ↗
10. 10.1002/eem2.1210910.1002/eem2.12109 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.polymer.2020.12259210.1016/j.polymer.2020.122592 ↗
12. 10.1007/s10853-015-9668-710.1007/s10853-015-9668-7 ↗
13. 10.1007/s10853-021-06246-w10.1007/s10853-021-06246-w ↗
14. 10.1007/s10853-023-08281-110.1007/s10853-023-08281-1 ↗
15. 10.1007/s11696-023-03089-410.1007/s11696-023-03089-4 ↗
16. 10.3934/matersci.2019.3.33510.3934/matersci.2019.3.335 ↗
17. 10.2478/aut-2020-000410.2478/aut-2020-0004 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.04.16810.1016/j.ceramint.2020.04.168 ↗
19. 10.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.09177-310.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.09177-3 ↗
20. 10.1115/1.404153210.1115/1.4041532 ↗
21. 10.1038/micronano.2015.4010.1038/micronano.2015.40 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.microrel.2021.11435210.1016/j.microrel.2021.114352 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.surfin.2023.10312310.1016/j.surfin.2023.103123 ↗
24. 10.3390/nano1212209310.3390/nano12122093 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.matlet.2017.09.06410.1016/j.matlet.2017.09.064 ↗
26. 10.1002/crat.20130037210.1002/crat.201300372 ↗
27. 10.1007/s10853-021-06819-910.1007/s10853-021-06819-9 ↗
28. 10.1149/1.205501510.1149/1.2055015 ↗
29. 10.1039/c2jm31434g10.1039/c2jm31434g ↗
30. 10.1557/JMR.2003.034310.1557/JMR.2003.0343 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.32404510.1063/1.324045 ↗
32. C. H.Seah S.Mridha L. H.Chan inProc. of the IEEE 1998 International Interconnect Technology Conf. (Cat. No.98EX102) IEEE Piscataway NJ1998 pp157–159.
33. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.06.03710.1016/j.jmapro.2021.06.037 ↗
34. Kumar S. · Int. J. Curr. Eng. Technol. · 2015 · 5 · 700
35. 10.1088/1742-6596/1057/1/01200510.1088/1742-6596/1057/1/012005 ↗
36. 10.3390/ma1105070410.3390/ma11050704 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jscs.2017.09.00410.1016/j.jscs.2017.09.004 ↗
38. ASTM D3359‐23. Standard Test Methods for Rating Adhesion by Tape Test 2023.
39. ASTM D1002 − 10. Standard Test Method for Apparent Shear Strength of Single‐Lap‐Joint Adhesively Bonded Metal Specimens by Tension Loading (Metal‐to‐ Metal) 2019.
40. 10.1063/1.34542410.1063/1.345424 ↗
41. 10.1016/B978-012524995-9/50025-810.1016/B978-012524995-9/50025-8 ↗
42. Seitz F. · 1940