Evaluation of creep damage accumulation models: Considerations of stepped testing and highly stressed volume
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT Many components experience combined temperature and stress loading and are designed to withstand creep. In this study, experimental creep testing was performed under both static and stepped loading conditions with constant temperature for two specimen geometries (tensile and three‐point bend). The objective of this study was to evaluate whether existing damage accumulation models accurately predict creep performance when considering step loading and stress gradients. Model predictions, based on static tensile creep data and using a highly stressed volume correction for the three‐point bend specimens and the experimental average damage sum, agreed well with experimental data; differences were on average within 38% (static) and 2.2 h (stepped). Comparisons showed more accurate predictions using an exponential Larson–Miller parameter curve and the Pavlou damage accumulation model. Findings of the current study have applicability to component design, where complex geometries often contain stress gradients and it is desirable to predict creep performance from static tensile creep data.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · High Temperature Alloys and Creep · Fire effects on concrete materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/978-3-662-04971-610.1007/978-3-662-04971-6 ↗
2. 10.1016/S0749-6419(02)00111-010.1016/S0749-6419(02)00111-0 ↗
3. 10.1007/978-3-540-69637-710.1007/978-3-540-69637-7 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0142-1123(97)00081-910.1016/S0142-1123(97)00081-9 ↗
5. Conducting creep, creep‐rupture, and stress rupture tests of metallic materials
6. A time‐temperature relationship for rupture and creep stresses
7. 10.1016/S0141-0296(00)00081-X10.1016/S0141-0296(00)00081-X ↗
8. Stephens R. I. · 2001
9. 10.1016/S0142-1123(00)00046-310.1016/S0142-1123(00)00046-3 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0142-1123(99)00049-310.1016/S0142-1123(99)00049-3 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0142-1123(97)00134-510.1016/S0142-1123(97)00134-5 ↗
12. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2006.00973.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.2006.00973.x ↗
13. 10.1016/S0997-7538(99)00124-210.1016/S0997-7538(99)00124-2 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2003.12.00510.1016/j.ijplas.2003.12.005 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2005.02.01010.1016/j.ijmecsci.2005.02.010 ↗
16. Properties of cast aluminum alloys
17. Aluminum and aluminum alloys
18. Standard practice for strain‐controlled fatigue
19. 10.1016/0029-5493(94)00973-310.1016/0029-5493(94)00973-3 ↗
20. Mordfin L.andLegate A.(1957) Creep behavior of structural joints of aircraft materials under constant loads and temperatures. NACA TN 3842.
21. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2003.10.00110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2003.10.001 ↗
22. Principles of variable amplitude fatigue design and testing