journal article·2007-02Open access

A fatigue model with local sensitivity analysis

E. CASTILLO, A. FERNÁNDEZ‐CANTELI, A. S. HADI, M. LÓPEZ‐AENLLE

Abstract

ABSTRACT The goal of this paper is two fold. First, it introduces a general parametric lifetime model for high‐cycle fatigue regime derived from physical, statistical, engineering and dimensional analysis considerations. The proposed model has two threshold parameters and three Weibull distribution parameters. A two‐step procedure is presented to estimate the parameters. In the first step, the two threshold parameters are estimated by minimizing a least squares regression function. In the second step, the parameters are estimated by the maximum likelihood method after pooling together the data from different stress levels. Since parameter estimation should always be accompanied by a sensitivity analysis of the fitted model, the second goal of this paper is to propose a method for sensitivity analysis for fatigue models. We show that the proposed sensitivity analysis methods are general and can be applied to any fatigue or lifetime model, not just to the one proposed here. Although several fatigue models have been proposed in the literature, to our knowledge this is the first attempt to produce methods for sensitivity analysis for fatigue models. The proposed method makes use of the well‐known duality property of mathematical programming, which states that the partial derivatives of the primal objective function with respect to the constraints right hand side parameters are the optimal values of the negative of the dual problem variables. For the parameters or data, for which sensitivities are sought, to appear on the right hand side, they are converted into artificial variables and set to their actual values, thus obtaining the desired constraints. Both the estimation and sensitivity analysis methods are illustrated by two examples, one application using real fatigue data and the other using simulated data. In addition, the sensitivity proposed method is also applied to an alternative fatigue model. Finally, some specific conclusions and recommendations are also given.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Optimal Experimental Design Methods

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1214/aos/117634551310.1214/aos/1176345513 ↗
2. Cook R. D. · Residuals and Influence in Regression · 1982
3. Assessment of local influence (with discussion)10.1111/j.2517-6161.1986.tb01398.x ↗
4. 10.1002/978047031676410.1002/9780470316764 ↗
5. Saltelli A. · Sensitivity Analysis · 2000
6. Die Lebensdauer von Kugellagern
7. 10.1520/STP35402S10.1520/STP35402S ↗
8. ASTM · Statistical Analysis of Fatigue Data · 1981
9. 10.1520/STP29330S10.1520/STP29330S ↗
10. Statistical model for fatigue analysis of wires, strands and cables
11. 10.1063/1.172334310.1063/1.1723343 ↗
12. Statistical interpretation of the miner‐number using an index of total damage
13. Lawless J. F. · Statistical Models and Methods for Lifetime Data · 1982
14. 10.2307/321406710.2307/3214067 ↗
15. 10.1080/01621459.1995.1047660610.1080/01621459.1995.10476606 ↗
16. 10.1046/j.1460-2695.1998.00104.x10.1046/j.1460-2695.1998.00104.x ↗
17. Pascual F. G.andMeeker W. Q.(1999)Estimating fatigue curves with the random fatigue‐limit model.Technometrics41 277–302.10.1080/00401706.1999.10485925 ↗
18. 10.1023/A:100762480395510.1023/A:1007624803955 ↗
19. Aczél J. · Lectures on Functional Equations and Their Applications · 1966
20. Castillo E. · Functional Equations in Science and Engineering · 1992
21. 10.1103/PhysRev.4.34510.1103/PhysRev.4.345 ↗
22. 10.1038/096396d010.1038/096396d0 ↗
23. Model experiments and the form of empirical equations
24. Galambos J. · The Asymptotic Theory of Extreme Order Statistics · 1987
25. Castillo E. · Extreme Value Theory in Engineering · 1988
26. Holmen J. O.(1979)Fatigue of Concrete by Constant and Variable Amplitude Loading The Norwegian Institute of Technology .Ph.D. Thesis. University of Trondheim .
27. 10.2307/253230610.2307/2532306 ↗
28. 10.1002/env.317005040510.1002/env.3170050405 ↗
29. Statistics of extremes
30. 10.1093/biomet/67.3.72310.1093/biomet/67.3.723 ↗
31. 10.1080/0094965830881062510.1080/00949658308810625 ↗
32. 10.1093/biomet/72.1.6710.1093/biomet/72.1.67 ↗
33. 10.1080/00401706.1985.1048804910.1080/00401706.1985.10488049 ↗
34. 10.1029/WR015i005p0104910.1029/WR015i005p01049 ↗
35. 10.1214/aos/117634455210.1214/aos/1176344552 ↗
36. 10.1038/scientificamerican0583-11610.1038/scientificamerican0583-116 ↗
37. 10.1007/978-1-4899-4541-910.1007/978-1-4899-4541-9 ↗
38. 10.1017/CBO978051180284310.1017/CBO9780511802843 ↗
39. Chernick M. R. · Bootstrap Methods · 1999
40. Castillo E. · Extreme Value and Related Models with Applications in Engineering and Science · 2004
41. Castillo E. Conejo A. Mínguez R.andCastillo C.(2006a)A closed formula for local sensitivity analysis in mathematical programming.Eng. Optim.38 93–112.10.1080/03052150500229418 ↗
42. 10.1007/s10957-005-7557-y10.1007/s10957-005-7557-y ↗
43. Luenberger D. G. · Linear and Nonlinear Programming · 1989
44. Bazaraa M. S. · Nonlinear Programming, Theory and Algorithms · 1993
45. 10.1002/978047122529410.1002/9780471225294 ↗
46. 10.1198/00401700400000050910.1198/004017004000000509 ↗
47. Conejo A. J. · Decomposition Techniques in Mathematical Programming: Engineering and Science Applications · 2006